ipl-logo

Non Individualism Personhood

2086 Words9 Pages

This essay will discuss the correct nature of the non-individualist view of person hood and the objections to that argument. The non-individualistic argument will be presented and following that there will be a discussion of the objections to the non-individualistic view of personhood. I will then address any flaws or possible replies to the objections presented. And finally, drawing on all the arguments and objections made, the essay will conclude that the non-individualists have the correct view of personhood. Non-individualists, such as Menkiti, believe that a human being cannot be a person as a lone individual. A person is only a person through other persons and because of other people. This belief has some of its roots in the word ‘Ubuntu’. …show more content…

Argument Non-individualist argue with five main premises, some that then are broken down into smaller parts, to prove that a ‘person is only a person through other persons’. The first premise of non-individualism is that a person is a participatory community, meaning that all members participate in all aspects of the community and share a conjoined responsibility. The second premise is that a person has to be a moral being to be considered a person. Morals are learned, not innate, so individual wouldn’t be able to form functional morals on their own. To become a person, a human will learn fundamental morals and values from the community they exist in. Without the community, there will be no morals. Without morals, there will be no ‘person’. Therefore without community, there will be no person. The third premise of non-individualism is that in order to be a person, a person must have an existence that is not necessarily limited by natural birth and death or by other human beings. Within Mentikis discussion of Africans and their views within non-individualism, he shares that when a human being dies, they just move into the stage of ancestral existence. They still exist in memory and can be reached through actions such as sacrifice. A person does not cease to exist at death because they are still ‘living’ within the community they existed in in their previous life stage. This continual existence after death is in existence because of the community of other …show more content…

Regardless of the perspective held, it is intuitively known from observation that each person thinks differently than another human being. Although a human being may have learned from the environment around them, this particular being has the ability to take this information and shape thoughts around this knowledge. A person has the ability to access his or her own private knowledge, that no other being or the community itself has access too. The ability a human being has to develop unique thoughts and has the privilege of accessing them makes them an individual because they are like no other being. They can create their own

Show More
Related
693 Words | 3 Pages

A Fierce Discontent McGerr, Michael E. A Fierce Discontent: The Rise and Fall of the Progressive Movement in America, 1870­1920. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2005. Print. In “A fierce Discontent”, the main thesis of the book is to give insight to the progressive movement during the 19th century.

Read More
1038 Words | 5 Pages

Then there is the subject, which is usually influenced by the culture around him and formed by the law. The self is subject to their economic status, ethnicity, education, language, etc. The stories a person knows and has

Read More
773 Words | 4 Pages

In “A Dialogue on Personal Identity and Immortality”, Gretchen Weirob and Sam Miller conduct a philosophical debate about the possibility of a continued existence after death. Weirob argues that she herself cannot exist after death because her identity is composed of her body, rationality, and consciousness. In Derek Parfit’s “Personal Identity” he ponders how the concept of identity works, and how the true nature of our identity affects some of the most important questions we have about our existence. I believe that Velleman did a better job of exploring the idea of identity than Weirob did.

Read More
1234 Words | 5 Pages

Through analysis of a few of the proposed necessities of personhood–consciousness, intelligence, and self-awareness–the

Read More
422 Words | 2 Pages

It is generally believed that human is a person merely after one is born even though babies cannot speak using a language and think deeply. In contrast, John A. Perry and Erna A. Perry do not think that an infant is human because babies have not developed their distinctive personality yet. They believe that to become a person, one should develop his or her unique and distinctive personality through maturation and socialization. Moreover, those two components of the process of becoming a person are interdependent in that without social interaction, people cannot undergo physical development normally, and vice versa. For example, a boy who is bullied from other students may grow as a short and thin man since he would not want to go outside of

Read More
918 Words | 4 Pages

I define person as an individual being with their own thoughts, feelings, beliefs and opinions. To me, it encompasses all aspects of a whole

Read More
1051 Words | 5 Pages

You are who your are because of other people. This we identify as Ubuntu, which is an African term meaning “you are because we are”. In the essay I will firstly discuss what Ubuntu is in the Ubuntu philosophy then discuss Plato’s idea of being human as well as Mogobe Ramose’s and Barbara Alice Mann’s view of what humanity is. However after having discussed from the different positions I will then justify why out of all the above mentioned philosophers I agree with Ramose’s view of what humanity is. All the report of what humanity(Ubuntu) is covered aspect such as human nature, goodness, virtue, kindness etc.

Read More
1423 Words | 6 Pages

The argument of whether or not a human has a soul has been argued throughout centuries. Derek Parfit discusses two separate theories of personal identity, Ego Theory and Bundle Theory. The argument of which present a more accurate account of personhood is very hard to determine. The Ego Theory has some flaws such the soul is separate from the body and is a immaterialist object within us. Bundle Theory is reinforced and proven by the split-brain case, however it can lead to the argument that there is no self.

Read More
1354 Words | 6 Pages

He has three fundamental arguments; 1. He rejects both the physical and soul theories of the self. 2. He asserts that personal identity is not what matters for the survival of the self. 3.

Read More
1280 Words | 6 Pages

Rene Descartes and David Lewis have both tried to define a person, and how we can differentiate between those who are and are not a person. I argue that they are both wrong, and that a person is a sentient being, who is self-aware. Apart from those criteria, a person must also live by and follow some sort of moral code or set of rules. Finally, personhood ought to be measured in varying degrees, like a gradient, as opposed to absolutes. Personhood is a very tricky term to define.

Read More
539 Words | 3 Pages

‘What it is to be a person by showing how culture-dependant personhood is’(…………….). In this regard, Mauss used ethnographic data to explain the idea of personhood or the self. He argued that personhood has a short history. In ancient societies people usually consider themselves as part of a group or what he call a sociocentric concept (Mauss, Marcel as cited in Carrithers, M, 1985). He also argued that the idea of self is a relative concept and socially constructed realty.

Read More
1642 Words | 7 Pages

Jeff Keenan Rel507 Professor Stainton Oct 8th The idea and conception of “I” or self determines how you view reality and sets the agenda for how you live life. All religions confront the idea of self, but the Upanishads and Buddhist thought offer a unique sense of self that is not addressed by other religions. This is important because an ideological conception of the self will reflect the goals, purposes and your overall perspective of your life.

Read More
1987 Words | 8 Pages

As a person goes through life he or she may wonder “Who am I?” and “What is my purpose?” The objective of this paper is to allow me to reflect and critically analyze who I am as a person. In this paper, I will discuss my social location and identity, my life experiences and my privileges and disadvantages.

Read More
1562 Words | 7 Pages

Self and personal identity looks at whether or not a person that has gone through various experiences in the past is considered as the same person in the present (Chapman, 2015,lecture slides: 3) and two approaches have been created in order to answer this question. The first approach is known as Cartesianism and this states that the self and personal identity are a part of the mind or soul, which is considered as an immaterial object that can exist outside of its vessel, which is the body. According to this approach, our soul does not need to be created by birth nor can it be destroyed by death due to its immateriality and unlike the body, it is not made of different parts that are responsible for its function such as the heart (Chapman,

Read More
1801 Words | 8 Pages

For many years, the issue of self-identity has been a problem that philosophers and scholars have been to explain using different theories. The question on self –identity tries to explain the concept of how a person today is different from the one in the years to come. In philosophy, the theory of personal identity tries to solve the questions who we are, our existence, and life after death. To understand the concept of self-identity, it is important to analyze a person over a period under given conditions. Despite the numerous theories on personal identity, the paper narrows down the study to the personal theories of John Locke and Rene Descartes, and their points of view on personal identity.

Read More

More about Non Individualism Personhood

Related Topics

Open Document