ipl-logo

North Vs South

572 Words3 Pages

Since the beginning of American history, conflicts have arose between the North and the South between the varied people that inhabited the land. Clashing viewpoints were common between people and the military, large and small states, and between free and slave states during the civil war. The Civil War was fought from 1861 to 1865, it was fought within the United States and was the North versus the South. The cause was rooted on the discussion of slavery, but also on sectionalism between the North and South. Sectionalism can be defined as when a group restricts their interests to a narrow sphere without concern for the general well-being of other groups. Such as the North South relationship. Although some believe slavery to be the major cause …show more content…

In the North the economy consisted of industrial machines and factories used to produce goods. Railroads were also used for fast communication and trade, and immigrants came to work at these factories, which led to cheaper labor. In the South it was much more of a rural based society that included a lot of farming and agriculture. Crops were relied on heavily as a form of profit. The rivers were what the South used to transport good, and as a result led to slow communication. Also the South used slaves for free labor, and did not have many immigrant workers at all. The economies of both the North and the South were fueled by many different classes of people. In the North, the middle class and lower class workers often did the manufacturing. While in the South indentured servants would work on plantations to grow tobacco, indigo, and cotton which were all very labor intensive. Once these people got out of servitude they would seek to farm the land themselves but often would not have the means to do so which led to a poor class of people who could not even afford slaves. These poor people made up an ample amount of the population. The poor class of the South obviously was unable to afford a plantation or slaves for that matter. Consequently, it can be implied that did not have a very large impact on their will to fight in the Civil War. Farmers were the next class of people, they owned small patches of land, never large enough to be a plantation. These farmers supported at most one slave who were usually treated more as workers than property. Finally, the large plantation owners were the final class of the South, they were able to own hundreds of slaves and some would treat them harshly. In spite of this, these people made up a very tiny portion of the population. Therefore, they would need to use their

Show More
Related
200 Words | 1 Pages

In the south there were slaves and in the north there were immigrants who worked. Document four says that the only thing northern soil favored was small farm stands rather than large plantations. This lead to the larger economy in the North. Document three shows us how the industries transported

Read More
1027 Words | 5 Pages

The reason behind the difference in economies is because of the wide range of soil and land in each region. The land in the South was more fertile and prosperous than the North. Since there was more swampy land in the South where rice was cultivating the reliability for slaves in colonies like Georgia and South Carolina were more present. The reasoning behind the use of slaves was not just because of the fact that whites could order them to do so, it was also for the fact that

Read More
655 Words | 3 Pages

In the South, a social hierarchy developed. Wealthy plantation owners were at the top, white subsistence farmers were in the middle, and enslaved black people at the bottom. In the North, there wasn’t a social hierarchy that was developed. The North was generally “Free Soil”, meaning they supported the idea of wage labor versus slavery. The European immigrants that came to the North were able to settle into the cities and start working.

Read More
611 Words | 3 Pages

The North’s and South’s economies were based on two different types of work. The Southern economy was based on agriculture and free labor, while the Northern economy was based on industry. The need

Read More
270 Words | 2 Pages

There were many differences between the North and the South. For instance, the South were very agricultural as opposed to the North which were industrial. The South used cheap labor in the form of slaves, whereas the North had workers do their jobs in factories at a faster pace. Because of sectionalism, competition between the north and the south began to increase.

Read More
735 Words | 3 Pages

The United States became increasingly divided between 1815 and 1840. The northern states and southern states developed independently from each other. America was more sectionalist than nationalist because the north and south disagreed over slavery, states’ rights, and economic policy. Perhaps the most obvious sectionalist issue was the conflict over slavery.

Read More
256 Words | 2 Pages

How was life in the North different from life in the South Life in the north was different than the south in multiple ways such as the differences between wages and economy. The different weather And the different kinds of society. The economy between north and south were very different, in the north there were lots of machines which is why there was such a big industrial revolution. But in the south there was more land to be bought and sold. there was a big demand for guns and ammunition to, lots of people needed guns for hunting and protection.

Read More
484 Words | 2 Pages

In the North slavery wasn't practiced. The economy of the North was mainly dependent on industry. The North depended on the South for

Read More
813 Words | 4 Pages

If the slaves missed a few days working on the plantation because of illness or what the case maybe that resulted in revenue loss. Whereas the North had many other alternatives to making revenue, such as mills and other manufacturing companies; the South basically depending on slaves to have income and to support their

Read More
388 Words | 2 Pages

Before the election of 1860, the conflicts between the north and the south were already significant. The meltdown of the 1850s is the compilation of a series of events where the north and the south disagreed. Such disagreements inspired the succession of southern states which eventually sparked the American Civil War. In the decade before the civil war, the north and south’s point of view of the slavery institution became poles apart. The north wanted to eradicate it, while the south wanted to spread it to the newly acquired territories.

Read More
1103 Words | 5 Pages

Sectionalism is the belief that some groups of people, who share certain cultural, economic, and geographic realities, form distinct sections and allegiances within a broader polity. It started way before the Civil War and persisted long after it ended. The Civil War began because of the North and South’s conflicts. It was the clearest illustration of sectionalism in the United States. The slavery issue in the South only had a relatively minor impact on the Southerners.

Read More
825 Words | 4 Pages

In February 1861, a new government was on the horizon in the United States, known as the Confederate States of America. Composed of seven states from the South, this new government looked to separate from a union that they felt was tipping in power towards those who wanted to threaten the rights of the South, especially slavery. Similarly, in early 1775, colonists were preparing for revolution against a power that they felt oppressed their rights and wanted to take away their liberties. However, the Civil War was a not a complete representation of a second American Revolution. The Civil War was more than an unsatisfied party rebelling against a larger power, but a clash between two vastly different ways of life.

Read More
828 Words | 4 Pages

“The South grew, but it did not develop,” is the way one historian described the South during the beginning of the nineteenth century because it failed to move from an agrarian to an industrial economy. This was primarily due to the fact that the South’s agricultural economy was skyrocketing, which caused little incentive for ambitious capitalists to look elsewhere for profit. Slavery played a major role in the prosperity of the South’s economy, as well as impacting it politically and socially. However, despite the common assumption that the majority of whites in the South were slave owners, in actuality only a small minority of southern whites did in fact own slaves. With a population of just above 8 million, the number of slaveholders was only 383,637.

Read More
524 Words | 3 Pages

The north has Bad farmland therefore they didn't have great agriculture. South has great farmland which meant they had a very good economy for agriculture and cash crops and much more. Secound was there various differences in the economy of the North and South. In the North for economy their was immigrants,textiles,cotton, and

Read More
574 Words | 3 Pages

Most were left unfed and if they disobeyed orders they were whipped and cruelly beaten. However, the most of the South didn 't see slavery as inhumane. To them slavery was needed, slaves were needed to help farm, as well as make profit for their owners. Slavery was seen as a source of

Read More

More about North Vs South

Open Document