ipl-logo

Not Believing In God

789 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Common critique of pascals wager

Pascal uses a peculiar format to argue the practical advantage of believing in God outweighs the disadvantage of not believing in God. Some religious believers argue this way of deciding your faith is an insult to true faith because they believe Pascals over simplify true faith into a simple game of poker. Pascal’s Wager states the possible outcome of being a believer in God and the possible outcomes of not believing in God. With the outcome provided from Pascal’s Wager, people can now decide whether to become a believer or not based on the possible outcomes. In this essay, I shall demonstrate the reasons behind agreeing with this claim. Pascal’s Wager is an argument that it is one’s best interest to believe that god exist. In this argument Pascal …show more content…

Believing in god and god do exist, hence the result of infinite rewards, if God cease to exist, then nothing happens. Not believing in god and god do exist, hence the result of infinite punishment or eternal punishment, if god ceases to exist, then nothing happens. Therefore, it is more beneficial to believe in god because the possibility of eternal punishment outweighs any advantages of believing otherwise. Pascal assumes we do not have other validating reasons to decide our faith, therefore we only decide solely based on this wager. In this case the subject being must decide between believing in god and not believing in god with only the results of Pascal’s Wager. But Pascal did not restrict other theory from interfering with this philosophical reasoning, thus decision theory is forced into this reasoning. In this sense of the problem, Pascal is forcing the person to become a believer because based on decision theory, one will pick the option that seems

Show More
Related

The Wager Rhetorical Analysis

739 Words | 3 Pages

He introduces the idea with a game, a simple wager of " heads or tails". However, in his game, one side of the coin represents the belief that God exist, while the other means that God does not exist. What we bet on in Pascal's Wager is also more than your ordinary school yard gamble with higher stake. In this wager, betting our entire lives, as well as the infinite beyond which we live on this

Read More

Dbq Essay On Hinduism

1176 Words | 5 Pages

In a world where religion represents a crucial role in the lives of countless people, there is no doubt that it influences an individual’s daily decisions. There are numerous religions that have been created, although the most significant ones have been widely practiced for centuries. Each of the world’s major religions have distinctions that set them apart from others. Consequently, these distinctions cause turmoil between religions due to individual biased opinion for their God. Followers of a religion suppose that their faith is designated as the most favorable and true religion of all practices.

Read More

Wager's Argument For The Existence Of God

378 Words | 2 Pages

The ontological argument states that perfection is a part of the concept of God, and that perfection entails existence, and so the concept of God entails God’s existence. However, it can be argued that if God is an infinite goodness, then its contrary, evil, should not exist. Alas, there is evil in the world, and, therefore, God cannot exist. The ontological argument also seeks to demonstrate that God exists on the basis of concept alone. Pascal’s Wager attempts to justify the belief in God with an

Read More

Pascal's Pensees Rhetorical Analysis

377 Words | 2 Pages

In Pascal’s Pensees, the difference between reason and believing are two completely different things. For Pascal, believing in God is good for the heart, but for all the non-believers, reason could be the only way to get closer to God. On other hand, there was a point where Pascal stated that there are somethings that reason does not understand the result, but the only thing that can understand the impossible is God. Thus, in Pascal tells his audience that the impossible reasoning is only understand by having God in their hearts.

Read More

Good And Evil In C. S. Lewis Mere Christianity

1015 Words | 5 Pages

In the rival conceptions of God, Lewis divides humanity into two main groups; those who believe in God or gods and those who do not. Those who believe in God, Lewis divides into two subgroups. The first, Pantheists view God as “beyond good and evil” (Lewis, 1980) as if God and the universe are one. The second, Christians view God as the absolute good Creator, separate from His creation.

Read More

Pascal's Waager Rhetorical Analysis

619 Words | 3 Pages

Argument Against the Argument of Pascal’s Wager In Pascal’s Wager, Pascal pioneered new thoughts and opinions amongst his peers in probability theories by attempting to justify that believing in God is advantageous to one’s personal interest. In this paper, I will argue that Pascal’s argument rationalizing why one should believe in God fails and I will suggest that even if one was to accept Pascal’s wager theory, this will not be a suffice resolution to reap the rewards that God has promised to Christian believers like myself who has chosen to believe in God due to my early childhood teachings, familial and inherited beliefs. Pascal offers a logical reason for believing in God: just as the hypothesis that God's existence is improbable, the

Read More

Pascal's Wager Argument

416 Words | 2 Pages

Atheists and thesis have always butted heads with each other on believing if there truly is a God and if so, should you believe in Him? Atheists are people who do not believe in a God or all powerful and all knowing creature, whereas Theists are ones who chose to believe in a God. Choosing to believe in God, being the creator and someone who is all knowing and powerful being, comes with some benefits according to Pascal’s wager. The fundamental idea behind Pascal's Wager is a Pros and con's list as to why one should believe in God and it shows positives and the negatives of believing and not believing. Pascal's Wager by Blaise Pascal is a persuasive argument for whether God exists, but there are many faults with the argument because viewing

Read More

Lewis's Argument For The Existence Of The Law Of Human Nature

623 Words | 3 Pages

Lewis proved he was not one for hesitation when it came to voicing his theories about the universe. Carefully manufacturing his first theory with inductive reasoning, Lewis is sure to incorporate logical thinking in his argument for the Law of Human Nature by pointing out different pieces of evidence to larger, more universal statements. He makes general observations after comparisons with different universal laws as well as different civilizations throughout time. Following these remarks, he delves further into his theory that people don’t need to be taught the Law of Nature, but that almost everyone knows it by nature. In the second paragraph, Lewis further establishes logical persuasion by pointing out his “Power Behind” theory with deductive reasoning.

Read More

Blaise Pascal's Argument For The Existence Of God?

609 Words | 3 Pages

As stated by Blaise Pascal in the argument of Pascal’s Wager, Pascal claims that most people bet on their lives that God either does or does not exist. In providing his reasoning, the probability of the various outcomes pertaining to finite and infinite gains as well as losses is shown, coming to the conclusion that logically one should believe in God. Although some people believe in God and an afterlife of paradise, we cannot truly grasp the extent of God’s existence. Through assessing Pascal’s argument, it is essential to keep in mind that logically, through the use of probability that one should believe in the existence of God. Pascal argues that a rational individual should live as though God does exist and seek a righteous life that pertains to living up to God’s will.

Read More

Peter Elbow's Essay On The Believing Game

771 Words | 4 Pages

In this essay, Elbow leans towards the believing game and tries to persuade the reader to leave the doubting game behind. Elbow states rules for each game that are used to form a plausible conclusion. The

Read More

Comparing Nietzche And Kierkegaard's Conception Of Religion

1137 Words | 5 Pages

God must be seen to have true meaning and that is what Pascal is pointing

Read More

Edmund Gettier's Article: Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?

1261 Words | 6 Pages

Second, he proposes that for any p, if s is justified in believing p and s deduces some q

Read More

Pascal's Wager Argument Analysis

1127 Words | 5 Pages

From Pascal’s perspective, the only right choice to make is “wager then, without hesitation, that He does exist” (Pascal). Although Pascal argues that believing in God is the most reasonable decision, there are objections against his argument. The “different practices” objection and the “utility of salvation cannot be infinite” objection will be analyzed according to Pascal’s Wager. Utter repetition of religious acts does not give an individual rational justification to believe in God. Pascal starts by mentioning that God's existence or nonexistence cannot be determined with reason; it cannot be proven, but a individual must “convince [himself], not by piling up proofs of God, but by subduing [his] passions” to believe in God (Pascal).

Read More

Superdominace Argument Essay: Believing In God

293 Words | 2 Pages

The superdominace argument from Pascal 's wager essentially states that we cannot be sure whether God exists, so we have to wager on a side because reason cannot help in our decision on God 's existence, but he supports believing in God. While the argument from expectation states "If you gain, you gain all; if you lose, you lose nothing" (Pascal 53). Pascal essentially says that when faced with God 's existence believing that he exists gives you two outcomes these are "you gain all" and "you lose nothing"(Pascal 53). Much less not believing in God can have the outcome of misery or simply status quo. To put it briefly, Pascal suggests one should wager on whether God exists on their own accord.

Read More

William Clifford The Ethics Of Belief Summary

752 Words | 4 Pages

William K. Clifford’s “The Ethics of Belief” is an essay about justification and how we are morally required to prove our beliefs. Clifford’s theory throughout the essay was “It is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence.” Clifford thinks that it is a moral obligation for you to confirm each of your beliefs with sufficient proof, no matter how questionable or insignificant the beliefs may be. I believe he thinks this because beliefs have serious effects and consequences on others.

Read More

More about Not Believing In God

Open Document