ipl-logo

Nozick's Principles Of Distributive Justice

1030 Words5 Pages

Nozick’s conception of the principles of distributive justice is an entitlement theory of justice. More specifically, it is a theory of how a society ought or ought not to regulate the distribution of goods, i.e. property, money. The entitlement theory claims that we can arrive whether a distribution of goods is just or not through looking at its history. Hence, Nozick believes in historical principles of justice that hold people’s past actions can create contrastive entitlements to things (Nozick, 1974: 155). Nozick contrasts his entitlement theory with end-state principles and patterned principles in arguing that these principles are inconsistent. A principle of distribution is patterned if it holds that a distribution of goods is just only if it meets a particular pattern (Nozick, 1974: 156). …show more content…

Therefore, this paper will discuss Nozick’s entitlement theory, what Nozick understands when principles of distribution are patterned and the identifying of those principles, i.e. patterned and end-state principles. It will discuss how Nozick believes patterns cause problems within a society and will argue that patterns and end-state principles upset liberty, redistribution and property rights of a person. It will additionally assess if Nozick’s rejection is plausible by discussing some of Rawls whom is a defender of patterned principles of justice, but will result that Nozick’s entitlement theory is plausible as it is best to look at a society’s history, to know that the distribution of goods is

Show More
Related
876 Words | 4 Pages

The police jumped into action and treated this case with urgency. The type of injustice that this conflict displayed was distributive injustice. Distributive injustice “is concerned with the criteria that lead you to feel you received a fair outcome” (Deutsch, 2007, p. 44). I believe in most cases involving black people the news make the police out to be bad guys. The most recent cases with the killing of African American males will make you think that the police don’t care about Blacks.

Read More
799 Words | 4 Pages

In the “Excerpts from The Second Treatise of Government” by John Locke, he talks about the state of nature, the property, and the ends of political society and government. In this paper, I will focus on explore Lockean theory of the property, and how his theory related to the economic inequality we face today. In the second paragraph, I will explain the Lockean concept of the state of nature, in order to help us explore Lockean theory of the property, and the end of political society and government. In the third paragraph, I will try to apply Lockean theory of property to the economic inequality we face today, and argue that his theory cannot fully justify the problem of economic inequality we face today. In the last paragraph, I will suggest what would be required in order to make the

Read More
775 Words | 4 Pages

Rawls’ idea of justice as fairness, which he presented in his book, “A Theory of Justice,” emphasizes the importance of equal opportunities and equal distribution of wealth and resources in society. This idea resonates with me because, as someone who values fairness and equality, I believe that everyone should have the same chance to succeed and live a fulfilling life. Rawls’ work has taught me to be more aware of societal inequalities and to work towards creating a fairer and more just

Read More
308 Words | 2 Pages

Romeo and Juliet is a tragic play that involves death, blood, and sex. Romeo and Juliet takes place in the 1950’s in Verona. This play considered a tragedy because Romeo and Juliet are faced with an obstacle that ends up in death and sorrow for the families. Romeo and Juliet “cannot” get married. The Capulets and Montagues hate each other and those are the families Romeo and Juliet come from.

Read More
1164 Words | 5 Pages

“You didn’t build that.” This phrase from Barack Obama’s 2012 speech ignited a debate on workmanship and alludes to the problem of what people are entitled to, under what circumstances, and whether they can claim the “fruits of their labor.” In this essay, I will discuss three prolific philosophers- John Locke, Johnathon Rawls, and Robert Nozick- and their principles in regard to the issue of whether one can compellingly say that because one did not “build” something, they are not completely entitled to its ownership. Among Rawls’s theories on distributive justice, Locke’s divine take on workmanship, and Nozick’s assertions that unequal distributions are legitimate (Wilt Chamberlain example), I will demonstrate that it is Nozick’s account whose is most compelling as his philosophies appear to have the most promise in generating fairness and stability though convincing logic appealing to mainly the political rather than the metaphysical explanations and justifications. In turn, this waving hand of Nozick’s waves to those in government debating broad, key issues such as welfare, or specific ones

Read More
414 Words | 2 Pages

In his essay, “On Communal Property”, Sir Thomas More discusses how the unfair distribution of property causes an ill-governed society. Also, he rants that the ownership of private property remains the bases of anxiety in our communities. In addition, he argues that the oppression of society stems from the existence of private property. But, in efforts to equalize the aspect of private property (thus destroying the concept), inevitably, society fails.

Read More
1102 Words | 5 Pages

In Rawls’ paper, “Two Concepts of Rules”, he sheds light on fact that a distinction between justifying a practice and actions that fall under said practice, must be made. This distinction, according to Rawls is crucial in the debate between Utilitarianism and Retributivism, more specifically in defending the Utilitarian view against common criticisms, which will be addressed further in this essay. This essay will be examining the troubling moral question that Rawls addresses; The subject of punishment, in the sense of attaching legal penalties to the violation of legal rules. Rawls acknowledges that most people hold the view that punishing, in broad terms, is an acceptable institution. However, there are difficulties involved with accepting

Read More
913 Words | 4 Pages

John Rawls believed that if certain individuals had natural talents, they did not always deserve the benefits that came with having these abilities. Instead, Rawls proposed, these inherent advantages should be used to benefit others. Although Rawls makes an excellent argument on why this should be the case, not all philosophers agreed with his reasoning, especially Robert Nozick. Nozick believed in distributing benefits in a fair manner in accordance with the Entitlement Theory, which has three subsections: Just Acquisition, Just Transfer and Just Rectification.

Read More
1508 Words | 7 Pages

Nozick proposes a definition of justice surrounding liberty. An entitlement theory comprising of three principles which result in freedom to be absolutely entitled to property and the self. His argument maintains that patterned principles of just distribution depart from this historical scheme and, in doing so, involve unacceptable infringements of liberty. Nozick defends his entitlement theory with a Wilt Chamberlain illustration. Despite being a persuasive and strong argument, the difficult aspect of this is that Nozick does not clearly tell us how to properly satisfy what those three principles require under the perception that his argument could shut down his patterned theory competitors.

Read More
982 Words | 4 Pages

It is different to traditional distributive principles. Walzer’s form of equality focuses on tyranny or dominance instead of “simple equality’s” focus on monopoly. Walzer believes traditional theories of equality are mistaken because they do not consider the pluralistic nature of social goods that are shared by distributive justice principles. Walzer’s own understanding of “complex equality” and justice finds “unitary models” of distributive justice to be incompatible with “complex equality”. Thus, to replace simple equality, Walzer argues for this “complex equality” – a state in which people are unequal within each sphere (but only according to the appropriate distributive laws for that sphere) but everything is still just overall as long as there is no ‘dominance’ of one sphere over the

Read More
894 Words | 4 Pages

From the time when it has first emerged, the law of Equity has been through numerous transformations. Hence, it is now another question whether these developments resulted in the rules of Equity becoming more determinate or not. One proposition in relation to this subject came from Professor Matthew Harding. In his article named ‘Equity and Rule of Law’, Professor argued that Equity has developed from its original days and the rules of equity have become more determinate. He further argued that this change can be seen in the recent treatment of incomplete gifts.

Read More
204 Words | 1 Pages

This essay will argue that while Locke makes a compelling argument for justifying private property as an unalienable right, there is more compelling evidence and arguments that suggest that Ownership cannot be justified by natural rights and that Locke’s view has instead provided justification for the entrenched inequality of the

Read More
742 Words | 3 Pages

Our Constitution permits and even directs the State to administer what may be termed 'distributive justice '. The concept of distributive justice in the sphere of law-making connotes, inter alia, the removal of economic inequalities and rectifying the injusticeresulting from dealings or transaction between unequals in society. Law should be used as an instruments of distributive justice to achieve a fair division of wealth among the members of society based upon the principle: 'From each according to his capacity, to each according to his

Read More
1821 Words | 8 Pages

On the other hand, while philosopher Robert Nozick paid a generous tribute to the brilliance of Rawls’ philosophical construction, he provides a rejection to Rawls’ claims from a libertarian perspective. Libertarians have the desire to divide and limit power. That is, government will be limited generally through a written constitution limiting the powers that the people delegate to government (Boaz, 2015). Nozick stated that Rawls’ idea would have resulted in the restriction of free choice or forced distribution within the society.

Read More
1163 Words | 5 Pages

According to the radical critique of law, how does law discriminate? Along with many other policies, the law also stresses on the discrimination which

Read More

More about Nozick's Principles Of Distributive Justice

Related Topics

Open Document