ipl-logo

Obergefell V. Hodges (2015)

677 Words3 Pages

This paper focuses on the Supreme Court case Obergefell v. Hodges (2015). This paper will give an overview of the case, the major arguments made by the plaitiffs and the defendents, as well as how the case has affected other rulings. This case has answered many legal questions and will shape any future cases that deal with gay marriage, possibly even equal rights.

Deatiled CH: James Obergefell and John Arthur was a same-sex couple and was married on July 11, 2013 on a medical transport plan on the tarmac at the airport in Baltimore, Maryland due to Arthur being unable to move (3,2) . John Arthur suffered from amotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and was terminally ill. Three months after their marriage Arthur passed away.(3) Due to his diagnosis John Arthur sought to have …show more content…

DeBoer and Rowse, both nurses with DeBoer in the neonatal until and Rowse in the emergency unit, had celebrated a commitment ceremony to honor their relation in 2007. In 2009, DeBoer and Rowse fostered a baby boy and went one to adopt him. During that same year, the family welcomed another son into the family. This new baby, who was born premature and was abandoned by his biological mother, required around the clock care. The following year, another member joined the family, a baby girl with special needs. However, in Michigan it is only permits only opposite-sex married couples or single individuals to adopt; therefore, each child can have only one woman as his or her legal parent. This meant that if there was an emergency, schools and hospitals would treat the three children as if they only had one parent. Furthermore, if a tragedy were to occur to either DeBoer or Rowse, the other “parent” would have no legal rights over the children she has not been permitted to adopt. This couple joined the case seeking relief from the continuing uncertainty that their unmarried status creates in their

Show More
Related
340 Words | 2 Pages

Lawrence v. Texas 539 US 558 (2003) Case Facts: In September 1998, a same-sex couple in Houston, Texas were arrested in their own apartment after police found them engaging in a consensual, intimate, sexual act. The two men, John Lawrence and Tyron Garner, were convicted of violating the Texas “Homosexual Conduct” Law, which made it a Class-C misdemeanor for same-sex adults to engage in sexual intercourse and considered it illegal sodonomy. The statute was created in 1973 after the state changed its criminal code to end the banning of heterosexual anal or oral sex. The sheriff deputies arrested and charged the couple for performing “deviate sexual intercourse” as listed in the mentioned in the Texas statute.

Read More
1990 Words | 8 Pages

All of the children, including Tariji, seemingly did very well adapting into their new home. The case review even stated that Tariji showed a deep attachment to her foster mother and considered her, her actual mother. The children spent over two years in foster care until they were returned to Fryer’s full-time care on November 17, 2013. By January in 2014 Tariji began to miss daycare. One of Tariji’s sibling told the daycare’s staff one day that Tariji did not come to daycare because Tariji had a “boo boo that mommy (didn’t) want anyone to see.”

Read More
281 Words | 2 Pages

Sukhsharn Kaur Johal Phil 4401 Dr. Nagel 28 August 2015 Loving v. Virginia This situation creates concern in that it brings up questions about how this case was handled by the State of Virginia and the Supreme Court of Appeals. Were Virginia anti-miscegenation laws constitutional?

Read More
168 Words | 1 Pages

Obergefell v. Hodges is most popularly referred to as the Supreme Court case for same-sex marriage. It is one of the many cases related to the topic of same-sex marriage being a constitutional right. In this specific case James Obergefell and John Arthur filed a lawsuit against the state of Ohio to allow the state to recognize their marriage on death certificates. Obergefell and Arthur were married on the tarmac of the Baltimore-Washington International Airport in Maryland by Arthur’s aunt, Paulette Roberts, on July 11, 2013. Sadly, Arthur died from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) just months into their marriage on October 22, 2013.

Read More
676 Words | 3 Pages

The Lawrence v. Texas ruling paved the way for equal treatment for gays and lesbians and brought them under the umbrella of the society by acknowledging their sexual preferences. 2. For the purpose of the paper we have chosen two American states - Florida and

Read More
849 Words | 4 Pages

The resolution for this case could be found depending on whether the petitioners, as free adults are allowed to engage in sexual conduct, exercising their liberty under the Due Process Clause. By this, the court deemed it necessary to reconsider the Bowers holding. The case’s initial statement was, “The issue presented is whether the Federal Constitution confers a fundamental right upon homosexuals to engage in sodomy… ,” 478 U.S., at 190 - informs on the Court’s failure to acknowledge the expanse of the liberty at stake. The laws in the Bowers case sought to control a person’s relationship, whether it would be formally

Read More
998 Words | 4 Pages

The Supreme Court granted a certiorari to answer the question if the rulings for other cases against homosexual’s equality had gone against the fourteenth amendment, if Bowers vs Hardwick should be overturned, and if homosexuals should have privacy in their own

Read More
658 Words | 3 Pages

In 1985, a couple was arrested and when given the chance to leave they decided to get married in washington dc, where it was legal. The wife decided she should fight for her rights to be married in her home state and sought help of an activist Kennedy. After many years, the court decided that the Virginia law violated the 14th amendment because they did not allow the lovings, and many interracial couples to be together. It was then decided that all people had the right to marry and love whomever they want. While many Supreme Court cases have had important lasting impacts in the United States , the Loving V Virginia court case was the most impactful landmark supreme court case because the supreme court made all anti-miscegenation laws unconstitutional.

Read More
774 Words | 4 Pages

1967, a court case was brought up to supreme court, involving two people, a white male and a black female fighting for their right to love each other without having any consequences. One night this married couple were arrested and banished and even jailed due to the fact these two people were just sleeping in the same bed and living in the same house. The laws prohibiting the right to interracial marriage and these two to even be together was called miscegenation laws. These laws prohibited any different race from being together, especially blacks and whites. The loving vs. Virginia court case proved that miscegenation laws were unconstitutional and exchanged back equality after the case was resolved, these laws didn’t allow any race to marry another and had unnecessary rules and punishments

Read More
1810 Words | 8 Pages

But, as with its Commerce Clause jurisprudence, the Court’s expansive rights jurisprudence may not be taken for granted. Consider the 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges case, which legalized same-sex marriage in all states. That decision, undeniably, was an audacious assertion of power by the Supreme Court, one that brought the guillotine down on states’ internal deliberations as to the merits of same-sex marriage. I thus cannot deny that this decision counts in favor of the view that the Court holds a bias toward centralization, but there is another side to this coin, namely, the four impassioned dissenting opinions delivered by the Court. The principal dissent among these decried the Court for “invalidat[ing] the marriage laws of more than half the States” without their assent.

Read More
1584 Words | 7 Pages

Unlike today’s society, a household cannot possess as many children and members as the guardians choose. Explaining the regulations of the capacity of children to be in a family unit, when his sister, Lily, wants to adopt a brother, Jonas pronounces the rules by reciting, “Two children-one male, one female-to each family unit” (Lowry 8). Furthermore, rather than the traditional way of bearing a child in a family, one must instead send in an application, and be approved by the Elders. Children are received from surogates, and watched over for the first year of their life by Nurturers. Recalling the time Jonas’ mother had sent her application for Lily, she described the time as, ““The year we got Lily, we knew,

Read More
911 Words | 4 Pages

The federal judge in San Antonio, Texas, “ruled that Texas ' ban on same-sex marriage violates the U.S. Constitution and demeans the dignity of gay couples "for no legitimate reason." Judge Orlando Garcia then granted two plaintiff couples ' request for an injunction barring the state from enforcing the ban.” (Keen 1) One of the couples sought to be married in Texas while the other couple had already been married in Massachusetts, but desired to be recognized by the state of Texas. In Garcia’s ruling, he states that, “the Texas bans violate the guarantees of due process and equal protection of the U.S. Constitution.”

Read More
1132 Words | 5 Pages

Tie to the audience: Some of the children that are in foster care might be related to you or the child could be someone that you know like a friend’s child. C. Thesis and Preview: Consequently, we need to do something to make adoption easier and better not only in the United States, but all over the world. Today I will give you a few solutions to fix the foster care system. I’ll begin by telling you about the need to improve foster care. II.

Read More
902 Words | 4 Pages

In 2015, the Obergefell v. Hodges case ended the “state bans on same-sex marriage”, therefore legalizing same-sex marriage (Important Supreme Court Cases). Now, “same-sex couples can now receive the benefits...of marriage that were largely exclusive to heterosexual couples” (Koch). The ruling has led to the modern fight for gay civil rights. Exposure to the LGBTQ+ community, the southern “Bathroom Bills”, and other fights for transgender rights, and the press for more LGBTQ+ representation in the media has erupted from this case. Both rulings had very big impacts on their respective communities.

Read More
772 Words | 4 Pages

Single parent adoption In today's society, one of the strongest controversy in the world today is over whether or not single parents should be allowed to adopt. Some believe it is socially acceptable for a single parent to adopt a child and that “single prospective adopters of both genders can have much to offer to an adopted child” (The Telegraph Tim Ross), others think that singles should not be able to adopt. In some eyes they see that a child needs two parents so a child can grow up having a mother and father figure to look up to, and by having two parents, one can fill in the other part when one is sick or tired or so on.

Read More

More about Obergefell V. Hodges (2015)

Related Topics

Open Document