“One might as well try to ride two horses moving in different directions, as to try to maintain in equal force two opposing or contradictory sets of desires.” (Robert Collier). For an object to possess strength, all phases of life must be complete. Throughout the development of the human race, an egocentric mindset has risen, creating the absence of forbearance, conducting to war. All humans have strengths and disabilities and even though it is hard to accept, to acquire power one must make up for those inabilities. Hence, withholding all aspects creates the foundation of power. Merging involves acquiring pieces from other substances to create balance. On that road, rejection can rise. The Civil War was an imperial conflict that arose within …show more content…
During the American Civil War, two distinct groups, North and South, differed in their economic strong suits because one depended on agriculture and the other on industrialization. Additionally, in the political aspect, one had the mentality of staying a union even if the cost was a complete transformation while the other argued secession. Lastly, in the social facet, one pleaded the profound immorality of slavery while the other the mistreatment of workers in the North. Tensions between both sides began as early as 1820 with the Missouri Compromise, when Missouri, a slave state, requested admission into the Union. Later, in 1850 after gaining a lot of territory from the Mexican-American War, the United States was facing a challenge. Therefore, it created the Compromise of 1850 as a way to solve their problems. After, in 1854, Congress passed the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which generated a lot of violence between pro-slavery and anti-slavery groups. This act was one of the main forces that juggled the conflict between the North and the South. Finally, the election of Abraham Lincoln, a Republican whose main goal was the abolition of slavery was the