ipl-logo

Obstacless To Take Over France In Shakespeare's Henry V

1912 Words8 Pages

In shakespeare's play, Henry V, the title character wants to take over France. This is surprising since he is young and taking over the french throne seems out of his capability. Throughout the play, he faces many obstacles in addition to his reputation. These include; a lack of refuge, fighting amongst his men, and his army is outnumbered. Henry solves these obstacles through his rhetoric. Henry wasn’t raised like most princes are. Most princes are taught from a young age how to be a proper king. Henry wasn’t. He partied and was what we would considered a playboy today. Henry encounters many obstacles in his reign. The first is demonstrated when the Bishop of Canterbury states: Since his addiction was to courses vain, His companies unletter’d, rude, and shallow, His hours fill’d up with riots, banquets, sports, And never noted in him any study, Any retirement, any …show more content…

But I will rise there with so full a glory That I will dazzle all the eyes of France, (1.2. 276-279). He is saying that while he was out partying, he was working with the common people.He has earned their trust. While the Dauphin was being trained by teachers and scholars, he was out with his people. This is ethos because he is basically saying that he has better experience to lead his people. The Dauphin doesn’t know his people and therefore cannot lead them as well as Henry can. King Henry and his men invade France in winter. His men are all freezing and many are sick, so they need a place to say. He comes to the town of Harfleur and tells the governor there to open the gates and let his men in: Open your gates. Come, uncle Exeter, Go you and enter Harfleur. There remain And fortify it strongly ‘gainst the French. Use mercy to them all. For us, dear uncle, The winter is coming on, and sickness

Show More
Related

Henry Fleming's Beliefs Of Soldiers In The Civil War

606 Words | 3 Pages

Henry's confidence is somewhat based on the curiosity of his young age. He is confident that war will bring him honor and glory, but he doesn’t yet realise the hardships that are associated with war. “He felt that in this crisis his laws of life were useless. Whatever he had learned of himself was here of no avail. He was an unknown quantity.”

Read More

A Rhetorical Analysis Essay On Patrick Henry

459 Words | 2 Pages

He uses ethos to persuade the audience by saying "sir were not ewak", reference to God, the credibility when he talks about God. God is a more credible person than the king. Patrick henry uses questions towards the audience like "are fleets and armies necessary to work of love and reconciliation?" He gets the audience to believe that his decision is a good decision, and that he can bring any fight or war and win like it was nothng.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Patrick Henry And Thomas Jefferson

854 Words | 4 Pages

The implication is that the people are being ruled. Henry used his skills in speech to persuade the Council or Parliament that trying to rule over others was wrong. He spoke out against the way things had always been done and

Read More

Henry V's Ethos Pathos Logos

304 Words | 2 Pages

Throughout the entire speech employs ethos because Henry is the king and an expert at warfare. His speech shows his skills at waging battle and encouraging his troops. He is getting his troops for battle with everything he has in him. “[A]nd teach them how to war”(Shakepeare). Henry V is using the skills he knows and using them for the better of his people.

Read More

Napoleon Bonaparte Rhetorical Analysis Essay

156 Words | 1 Pages

The soul of Europe, like your hearts, gleams with happiness When remembering the great Napoleonic era And you, my soldiers, my people! Do you recall your Emperor? Le grand peuple français!

Read More

How Did King Henry's Effect On Normandy

95 Words | 1 Pages

Henry I (c. 1068 – 1135) was King of England from 1100 to 1135. After his dad, William the Conqueror, kicked the bucket in 1087, Henry's more seasoned siblings Robert and William Rufus acquired Normandy and England, individually, while Henry was landless. He grabbed the English throne after William Rufus' demise in 1100, and Robert attacked England to claim it. A settlement between the two affirmed Henry as ruler, yet it was brief; Henry attacked Normandy and crushed Robert. Henry's control of Normandy was tested by William Clito, Robert's child, and a disobedience came

Read More

Holinshed Vs Shakespeare Analysis

654 Words | 3 Pages

Holinshed depicts Henry as a king who responds appropriately to an insult to himself and England. Shakespeare, on the other hand, delves deeper and gives Henry a more sinister spin. The inclusion of abrasive language and phrases that turn the blame for destruction onto the Dauphin in Shakespeare’s Henry V clearly paint Henry in a more Machiavellian light than in Holinshed’s

Read More

How Is Henry V A Flawed King

1492 Words | 6 Pages

Nevertheless, in one of William Shakespeare’s acclaimed plays about this monarch’s life, Henry V, Shakespeare depicted Henry as far from an ideal king, even though he may have displayed certain admirable qualities at times. Shakespeare showed Henry V to be a flawed king, as demonstrated by his motives, aggression, and lies. First, Shakespeare displayed Henry V’s flawed character through his mixed, conflicting motives of self-abandon for God’s sake and self-glorification for his own. Throughout the play, we find hints that a desire to do God’s will motivated Henry V. Before declaring war against France, he sought the approval of God by way of the established English ecclesiastical authority, and even when he believed he was justified in his claim to rule France, he understood his duty to his Lord, saying, “For we have now no thought in us but France, / Save those to God, that run before our business” (1.2.315-316).

Read More

How Was Henry Viii Cruel Or Evil Leader

1033 Words | 5 Pages

He also killed the wives that he did not want to live with anymore because he did not like them (Williams,1). Henry was also good in battles and training. He also killed most of his children because he wanted a son to become ruler when he died. He did not like the daughters that he had because he needed people to take his role when he died. Although Henry VIII was an adamant and mighty king, he was also a cruel and evil leader who executed many people.

Read More

Machiavelli's The Prince Analysis

900 Words | 4 Pages

Henry asserts that his soldiers’ “duty is the King’s,” convincing them to persevere and believe that the war is just (Henry V,

Read More

Prince Henry's Speech Analysis

705 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout William Shakespeare’s 1597 History “The First Part of King Henry the Fourth”, the importance of individual reputation proves to be a catalyst for character advancement and plot development alike. King Henry’s repeated emphasis on the superior characteristics of himself and Hotspur earlier in the scene establish a dichotomy between the ideal leader and Prince Henry. In a rebuttal to his father 's disapproving tone, Hal vows to reclaim both his honor as a prince and his honor as a son. Shakespeare’s use of language through lines 129-159 in act III.2 foreshadows events to come while reinforcing Prince Henry’s earlier assertion that he will be the victor when battling Hotspur.

Read More

Henry V And Henry V Comparison

1093 Words | 5 Pages

Shakespeare’s play, Henry V, portrays the newly crowned king of England, King Henry V, as a committed, fearless, and relentless leader. France is England’s archenemy and their relationship only worsens after the Dauphin delivers a mocking message to England’s new king. The Dauphin frequently ridicules the English and King Henry, whereas, the King of France, Charles VI, does not underestimate Henry and his people as his son does. (Source B) Throughout the play, the two leaders display their differences in terms of personality, leadership, communication skills, and ethics.

Read More

King Henry V's Private Life

1024 Words | 5 Pages

We see Henry grow through this scene and we begin to see what kind of man Henry really is and that although he may have to act as a barbaric king who has no mercy in reality he is a humane man with worthy morals. He is trying to convince the locals to give up their town after hours of fighting; Henry makes a daunting speech claiming that he “will not leave the half-achieved Harfleur till her ashes she lie buried” declaring that if they do not surrender he will kill their fathers, rape their woman and spike their children “your naked infants spitted upon pikes” at this point in the play, we have discovered Henry as a man of religion and good morals and it is a surprise to see Henry with such a bestial speech. As a reader you soon realise that in fact he was merely bluffing and had no real intention of carrying out such inhumane acts “Use mercy to them all for us” he says after securing Harfleur. We have begun to see Henry’s morals and how these affect his choices as king as other kings may have shown no mercy and carried out the actions Henry

Read More

King Henry VII: Who Was The Better King

1118 Words | 5 Pages

When Henry VIII came to the throne he wanted to be a powerful king throughout Europe. For the first two years of his reign, he took a non military approach like his father, but after this he began to take a more confrontational approach. One of his main aims was to win back land in France conquered by Henry V and to lay a claim to the French throne. Sadly, he did not achieve this and did not have enough resources to defeat the French while they had a wide range of resources at their disposal. Another negative was that Henry was also manipulated

Read More

Henry V Nationalism

1434 Words | 6 Pages

Shakespeare’s play, Henry V, provides a strong theme of the idea of nationalism. This emerging nationalism seen in Shakespeare’s writing is in direct correlation with the politics of the time. England was becoming an international power and the production of Henry V showed the portrayal of nationalism as a loyal and glorified version of the monarchy, but it also criticized the inequality among the classes and the disconnect between the common people and their rulers. This play was written and produced to show England as a whole with its citizens and rulers joining together for England’s continued existence, power, and common good. Through Shakespeare’s play you see this idea of nationalism portrayed strongly through the character of Henry V

Read More

More about Obstacless To Take Over France In Shakespeare's Henry V

Related Topics

Open Document