Of Mice And Men Rhetorical Analysis

566 Words3 Pages

The True Nature of Mankind Of Mice and Men by American author, John Steinbeck, is the story of a special companionship between two men, George and Lennie. It begins when they escape a lynch mob in search for a new place to work so they are able to achieve their dream of buying a ranch. They do not want just any ranch; a ranch with rabbits for Lennie to tend to, a ranch for George to grow all the food that they could possibly need, and a ranch with a beautiful big house and stove. Throughout the novel, Steinbeck conveys the struggles of the trying times through George, Lennie, and their fellows using many different rhetorical devices to prove that the true nature of mankind has the inability to accept their actions right, wrong, or indifferent. …show more content…

At the beginning of the novel he accidently kills a mouse, and then a puppy, and ultimately Curley’s wife. As he said, “I can still tend the rabbits, George?... I didn't mean no harm, George.” (65), he may have not meant to harm anything or anyone but he did not understand or accept the severity of his actions, instead he was concerned about the tending of his future rabbits. Lennie’s actions solidified Steinbeck’s stance on the true nature of mankind through his diction. His tone of a young child in an adult body is what makes George believe his words and even support him during the trying times. Lennie was not the only one in denial of his actions during the novel, Candy also displayed several