The short article, “Zero-Waste Living Isn’t Realistic For Everybody”, delves into how the push for the world to transition to buying sustainable alternatives should not be the way to solve the world’s climate change crisis. Instead, the author, Eugenie Budnik, wrote this article to argue that in order to solve the climate change crisis currently occurring, the world has to recognize that environmental issues are intrinsically linked to social justice issues, and by addressing them, the environmental issues will figure themselves out. How Gudnik delivers his argument is through a combination of multiple rhetorical appeals, and a calculated structure of his ideas. Budnik develops his argument through his use of logos, pathos, tone switches, and a specific structure. Budnik utilizes examples of both pathos and logos to emphasize that environmental issues are intrinsically linked to social justice issues. The beginning portion of the article contains a brief synopsis on how …show more content…
After discussing the triumphs as a result of the recently newfound sustainability movement, a tone switch occurs, in which Budnik transitions into a more stern perspective to set up the first part of his argument. The tone switch occurs when Budnik wrote, “The truth is sustainability is a privilege not many can afford, and shunning the average consumer for not making sustainable decisions is not the answer to our environmental crises.” This tone switch makes Budnik’s application of pathos more powerful. Budnik applies examples of pathos to appeal to his audience’s emotions as a way to convince his audience that sustainable substitutes are too costly for the lower class. As an example of repetition, Budnik conveys, “How can you expect someone to worry about the greenhouse gas emissions that have been produced by the food that they’re