Controversy Surrounding the Keystone XL Pipeline To build or not to build, this choice will impact the relationship between the US and Canada and determine the level of dependence the US will have on countries that are not so friendly. “TransCanada’s proposed Keystone XL Pipeline would transport oil sands crude from Canada and shale oil produced in North Dakota and Montana to a market hub in Nebraska for delivery to Gulf Coast refineries. The pipeline would consist of 875 miles of 36-inch pipe with the capacity to transport 830,000 barrels per day” (Parfomak, Pirog, Luther and Vann 4). The construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline would strengthen the United States economy, provide energy security and have minimal environmental impact. “The Keystone XL project would create $1.1 trillion in private capital investment at no
Nonetheless, James Cameron still achieved his task of raising awareness of the oil sands by creating a close depiction of what the oil sands do to nearby cultures and our environment. The Alberta oil sands and the movie Avatar are very similar in terms of their effects on the ecological sustainability. In both the Avatar and the Alberta oil sands, the biodiversity decreases rapidly solely by the cause of humans. Oil sands are run by companies and require trees and plants to be stipt from land in order to extract oil from the ground.
The Ontario government believes that the minerals in the Northern Ontario Ring of Fire should be mined because of the positive impact the process will have on the First Nations, the long and short term economic benefits for the region and the country and the preparations that the government is going to make to carry out the project in a responsible way. Government consultation with members of the tribes of the First Nations have shown that these tribes believe mining should proceed because of the many positive effects on their communities. They are asking for four main assurances for the Ring of Fire mining to occur. These include: having the transport routes and mining site locations reviewed by them to protect their cultural sites; training for the jobs and economic support during the training; a percentage of the jobs that are created in the region; and proper waste management. The government is willing to work with the First Nations to ensure that
To extract and produce the oil from the sands, carbon is released into the air 17% more than that of conventional oil. The increasing carbon emissions in the air can speed up the changing climate, and can lead to severe health risks. Pollution is a result of extracting this alternative oil, but
The Energy East Pipeline is a 4,600 km pipeline that will transport crude oil from Alberta to New Brunswick. The project is in place from TransCanada which is a Canadian company that builds oil pipelines. This essay will explain the benefits and negative effects that can occur if Canada goes through with the installation of the pipeline across Canada. It will also discuss how all three levels of the government influence the subject and who ones to make the final approval is. Currently, the energy east pipeline is still being discussed because there are people who are against the installation of the pipeline and who are fighting to stop this from happenings because they are afraid of what the risks can cause.
Having an access pipeline in North Dakota will make transporting oil to Iowa much safer and less costly than it has been, since there won’t be as much need for trucks and railroads. In a study conducted about whether the Bakken wells, the main pipelines throughout Iowa that the North Dakota Access Pipeline would connect to, are energy efficient, the scientists wrote that they “do not see evidence that Bakken wells are unsustainable, unproductive or “subsidized” from a physical or energetic basis.” (Brandt). This means that the wells are high quality and no energy is wasted, further meaning that the wells are cost efficient and safe for the surrounding areas, so that North Dakota’s economy can grow. The pipeline will directly effect North Dakota’s economy, since it will add, “33.000 temporary Hill-time jobs[,]SI.9 billion in income [,] Nearly $5 billion in increased production and sales[,] [$]156 million in state and local taxes.
The U.S. uses 25% to 30% of the oil produced in the world, yet has less than 3% of known oil reserves,” (Doc C Paragraph 3).This is important because if becoming self-sufficient is impossible than is drilling even worth
Today there are many metallic minerals in the area including nickel, gold, and chromium. These are all important contributors to the economy in the Canadian Shield. The Canadian Shield is the largest producer in Canada of nickel, copper, gold platinum group metals, copper, salt and structural materials. Mining benefits all areas of the province, providing a broad scope of employment and entrepreneurial opportunities. One of the biggest mines in the Canadian shield is the nickel mines in Sudbury.
Fishes don’t swim in oil What happens when you force a fish in oil? it dies. Fishes live in water, not in oil. So as the Lubicon Cree.
The environmental argument is coming from a clash over the fact they are basically stripping the canadian boreal forest, the path of the pipeline extends across major aquifers, and pipelines tend to leak and destroy surrounding environments. In addition ccording to The Center for Climate and Energy Solutions State, “epartment’s draft SEIS found that oil from the Canadian oil sands is 17 percent more carbon-intensive than the average oil consumed in the United States... It is estimated that the U.S. greenhouse gas footprint would increase by 3 million to 21 million metric tons per year, or around 0.04 percent to 0.3 percent of the 2010 levels, if Keystone is built. Fortunately on November 6, 2015, President Barack Obama’s administration rejected the Keystone Pipeline XL after 7 years of dispute. As mentioned in the Wall Street Journal, Obama stated “the project would not have lowered gas prices, improved energy security or made a meaningful long-term contribution to the economy
This amount of oil coming into the United States from Canada would have made a positive impact for the United States. It is not in the best interest of the United States to purchase our oil from across seas, because transporting oil via freight ships, railways and trucks can be detrimental to oceans and the earth, like the accident that occurred in 2015 when 14 tanker cars derailed in West Virginia (News Tribune, February 16,
By fracking for natural gas and shifting from coal to natural gas power generation plants, we could benefit economically, save our environment, and save millions of gallons of
In response to high oil prices in the late 1970s due to political and military turmoil in the oil producing Middle-east that was crippling the Canadian economy (Ontario and Quebec), Pierre Trudeau 's government implemented the policy in order to regulate oil prices and keep them low. The program had three main goals that included: “reducing Canada 's dependence on foreign oil, by encouraging greater self-sufficiency in domestic supplies; redistributing oil wealth via taxes and resource royalties, from Alberta towards the federal government and consumers; and gaining greater Canadian ownership of the oil industry.” (Bregha,2006). This hurt oil-producing provinces such as Alberta whose economy depends on oil. Because natural resources are a provincial jurisdiction, Alberta felt that the federal government was intruding on what is theirs and stealing their wealth.
As the years progressed and the ages evolved, the demand for minerals and ores increased. The high demand resulted in a faster process and worse environmental conditions, when mining. These mining strategies posed a threat towards Canada’s environment and created a challenge the country had to face. The strategies created “erosion, sinkholes, loss of biodiversity, contamination of soil, ground and surface water.” (nrcan.gr.ca/mining)
For the citizens, “fracking will give them jobs so they can make money and support their families” (Rogowsky). Furthermore, with the addition of fracking “the United States can get about 1.8 trillion barrels of shale (“sedimentary rocks that have rich sources of petroleum and natural gas” (Rogowsky)) a year compared to Saudi
