ipl-logo

Operation Anaconda Essay

752 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Analytical essay on operation anaconda

Report on Operation Anaconda

Thomas Troms
91/94 CMF SLC CLASS 23-023
Instructor Name Michael J Burger
Assignment Due Date Report on Operation Anaconda
Operation Anaconda was a military operation conducted by the United States and its allies, including Afghan military forces, in March 2002. Operation Anaconda was a joint effort to disrupt al-Qaida and Taliban operations in the eastern province of Paktia in Afghanistan. The operation began on March 2, 2002, and lasted for over a week. The operation took place in the rugged and mountainous terrain of the eastern province of Paktia in Afghanistan. The operation involved a large number of ground troops and air support, working together to encircle and destroy enemy forces in the region. …show more content…

By empowering subordinates to make decisions and take initiative, while maintaining unity of effort and disciplined execution, the operation disrupted enemy operations in the region and achieved its objectives.

Operation Anaconda was a successful military operation conducted by the United States and its allies, including Afghan military forces, in March 2002, to disrupt al-Qaida and Taliban operations in the eastern province of Paktia in Afghanistan (Smith, 2004). The operation lasted for over a week, beginning on March 2, 2002, and involved a large number of ground troops and air support working together to encircle and destroy enemy forces in the region (Eikenberry, 2002).
The success of Operation Anaconda was largely due to the principles of Mission Command, which emphasized trust, shared understanding, disciplined initiative, shared risk, and a shared sense of purpose (Johnson, 2011). The commanders provided a clear understanding of their intent, and the subordinate units understood their roles and responsibilities, enabling decentralized decision-making and subordinates taking initiative within the overall mission (Joint Chiefs of Staff, …show more content…

Subordinate units were empowered to make decisions and take action within the overall intent, but this did not mean they acted independently or without discipline. They were required to coordinate their actions with other units and maintain communication with higher headquarters, allowing for flexibility in execution while ensuring unity of effort.
Shared understanding of the risk was another critical aspect of the Mission Command principles that contributed to the success of Operation Anaconda (Joint Chiefs of Staff, 2011). The commanders and subordinates recognized the risks involved in the operation, such as the challenging terrain and weather conditions. They took calculated risks, such as conducting air assaults, while maintaining situational awareness and adapting to the changing circumstances.
Finally, the shared sense of purpose was a vital factor in the success of Operation Anaconda (Spencer, 2002). The commanders and subordinates shared a common understanding of the importance of the mission and its implications for national security, motivating them to work together to achieve the common goal, despite the challenges and risks

Show More
Related
747 Words | 3 Pages

Starting in mid-January to mid-February, there was interest in assaulting the Shahikot Valley in the Paktia province of Afghanistan by employing U.S. ground combat forces as part as an operation due to intelligence reports suggesting that enemy forces, which included al Qaeda and the Taliban where in the stages of reoccupying the area to regroup its forces after its sustaining defeats during the early stages of Operation Enduring Freedom. A debate between intelligence agencies on whether the enemy troops would be on the valley floor or on the hills. Well before the battle, early intelligence estimates, which drew on HUMINT and other sources, claimed that nearly 1,000 al Qaeda and Taliban forces might be present in the Shahikot Valley but then were lowered to about 200 to 300 personnel (Baranick, Binnendijk , Kuglar, 2009). They also concluded that they were mostly living in the valley’s villages, rather than deployed in the surrounding mountains and ridgelines as they thought they would be from the more tactical

Read More
1542 Words | 7 Pages

On July 30, 2008, a bloody battle involving Coalition forces took place in the mountainous eastern Afghan province of Nuristan. This was the Battle of Wanat and the devastating amount of Coalition casualties began a vigorous investigation by the United States Army. The village of Wanat, defended by Second Platoon, Chosen Company, Second Battalion, 503rd Infantry Regiment, 173rd Airborne Brigade Combat Team would fall victim to numerous bad decision made by higher command. Although the men of Chosen Company fought hard, they ended up surrounded, vastly outnumbered, and without any Battalion assets. This paper will argue the reasons for the disastrous outcome of the Battle of Wanat; examining the effective company leadership exploiting effective

Read More
1069 Words | 5 Pages

https://doi.org/10.2991/mplg-ia-19.2019.24 Greentree, T. (2021). What went wrong in Afghanistan? The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters, 51(4), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.55540/0031-1723.3088 Kugler, R. (2007). Operation anaconda in Afghanistan: A Case Study of Adaptation in Battle.

Read More
1265 Words | 6 Pages

The Afghan’s role was to simply go into the Valley and arrest the enemy fighters separating them from the innocent civilians. Once the actual operation took place, this did not happen the Afghan forces retreated while taking direct fire (Geibel,

Read More
944 Words | 4 Pages

Operation Anaconda and the 7 Principals of Mission Command Operation Anaconda was a large-scale joint military operation conducted by the United States and its coalition partners, which implemented the seven principles of mission command. By following the principles of mission command, Operation Anaconda effectively coordinated the efforts of multiple branches of the United States military to achieve its objectives. The mission was launched in 2002 as a part of the War on Terror to destroy terrorist networks in Afghanistan and surrounding countries. Operation Anaconda and mission command go hand in hand as they emphasize decentralized decision-making and mission-type orders. The seven Mission Command principles used throughout Operation Anaconda were competence, mutual trust, shared understanding, commander's intent, mission orders, disciplined initiative, and risk acceptance.

Read More
850 Words | 4 Pages

Joint Planning for Operation Anaconda SFC Spurlock, Matthew MLC Class 005-18 Joint Planning for Operation Anaconda Since the beginning of the Global War on Terrorism, there have been numerous battles. One of the most important battles that shaped future joint planning of operations was Operation Anaconda. The outcome of this operation was ultimately successful, however, the original intent from the commanders were not met due to errors in the joint planning process. Joint planning during Operation Anaconda proved ineffective because of inaccurate intelligence about the terrain and weather, the exemption of Air Force and Navy during the initial planning phase, and false assumptions about the enemy. Intelligence Intelligence Preparation

Read More
2222 Words | 9 Pages

Leaders at all levels of the Army are faced with difficult decisions every day, decisions that can affect the lives of everyone around them. The thought processes used by individual leaders to make decisions can be as far reaching as their imagination; however, it is every leader’s responsibility to make these decisions using the tenants of mission command. Mission command is not an easy skill to master, however great leaders understand it and the proper use of it when planning a mission. Mission command is broken down into six major principles: Build cohesive teams through trust, create a shared understanding, provide a clear commanders’ intent, exercise-disciplined initiative, use mission orders and accept prudent risk . General Douglas

Read More
1593 Words | 7 Pages

Operation Eagle Claw The purpose of this paper is to outline the events of Operation Eagle Claw, the mistakes made, lessons learned, and additional outcomes. Operation Eagle Claw was essentially doomed from the beginning. President Jimmy Carter hastily authorized a Joint forces operation which inevitably failed due to lack of understanding and training between the forces. There was no single point of failure for the mission; it was across the board, from training to planning, intelligence collection, and time.

Read More
1128 Words | 5 Pages

By definition, “mission command is the exercise of authority and direction by the commander using mission orders to enable disciplined initiative within the commander’s intent to empower agile and adaptive leaders in the conduct of unified land operations,” according to ADRP 5-0. Mission command is about knowing when to change the task to fit the purpose. This paper is intended to analyze the mission command of one side of the battle, focusing on the commander’s role in the operations process. The Battle of Bunker Hill was the most important battle of the American Revolution because of Colonel Prescott’s superior command and control.

Read More
486 Words | 2 Pages

1,700 American troops and 1,000 Pro-government Afghanistan troops fought about 300-1,000 Al-Qaeda and Taliban Troops. At the end it was a Coalition victory (which

Read More
772 Words | 4 Pages

Operation Anaconda was a major battle in March 2002 during the War in Afghanistan. The purpose of the operation was to eliminate the al-Qaida and Taliban forces in the Shahi-Kot Valley and Arma Mountains region. This essay will address the timeline, locations and casualties of Operation Anaconda, as well as the success of the mission overall. Operation Anaconda was a joint military operation conducted in the Shahi-Kot Valley and Arma Mountains in Afghanistan in 2002. This operation was successful in targeting and eliminating Taliban and al-Qaeda forces in the region.

Read More
1550 Words | 7 Pages

Beyond Command and Control, the joint functions include intelligence, fires, movement and maneuver, protection, sustainment, and information. As the largest operation in WWII up until that time, Operation Husky was a proving ground for integration of joint function. Given the command and control struggles, it follows that joint integration in Operation Husky was less than optimal, especially because “joint force components have different function-oriented approaches, procedures, and perspectives.” Presented below are examples of how shortcomings in intelligence and movement and maneuver resulted in lost momentum or lost opportunity for the

Read More
1262 Words | 6 Pages

Among these five characteristics; military expertise, honorable service, trust, esprit de corps, and stewardship of the profession, I believe that military expertise and stewardship of the profession are the two characteristics that make a leader excel in the presence of their peers. ADRP 1 defines military expertise as, “Military expertise is the design, generation, support, and ethical application of land power, primarily in unified land operations, and all supporting capabilities essential to accomplish the mission in defense of the American people”. In order to gain trust from your subordinates for them to follow your guidance, a leader must have military expertise. Without being an expert in your field, subordinates will not trust your guidance provided unto them. ADRP 1 defines Stewardship of the Profession as, “Stewardship is the responsibility of Army professionals to ensure the profession maintains its five essential characteristics now and into the future”.

Read More
641 Words | 3 Pages

A Commander sustains an ethical command climate in war by establishing clear intent and purpose for their organization, accentuated through his vision. The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) and the Law of War are the military guidelines and penalties for soldiers to act accordingly. Distinctively, the majority of people know the difference between right and wrong. Command team (i.e. Commander and NCOs) are role models for the organization and set the example for their subordinates, which led to sustaining an ethical climate. Discipline organization exhibits high physical fitness, technical competence and successfully accomplish the mission.

Read More
1056 Words | 5 Pages

The Battle Took Longer Than Expected The Shahikot Valley became a place of interest in January and February 2002 according to case studies five, by Richard Kulger (2007). The Shahikot valley is eighty miles southeast of Kubal, Afghanistan. The natural mountain

Read More

More about Operation Anaconda Essay

Related Topics

Open Document