This paper will discuss the use of optimism in Candide by Voltaire and Zaabalawi by Naguib Mahfouz. We will look at downside to optimism as portrayed in both stories; wherein, morality becomes questionable, a lack of critical thinking breeds naivety, and inner peace is lost. A sense of purpose and satisfaction are achieved once over analyzation ceases to dominate the mind; allowing one to simply live life without foreseeing or arranging the outcome.
In Candide, Voltaire mocks the philosophy “the best of all possible worlds” to pinpoint the shortcomings of this optimistic theory which says everything is arranged for the best. What most would consider as bad will be beneficial to the good of something else, and therefore essential in the grand scheme of things. Candide, who Voltaire (2013) describes as a “young metaphysician, extremely ignorant of the ways of the world” (p. 103), is mentored by Pangloss, who blindly adheres to the best of all possible worlds theory despite the numerous tragedies and atrocities he experiences. Pangloss’ allegiance can be seen when Candide attempts to save the Anabaptist from drowning after being thrown overboard Pangloss stops him because “the bay of Lisbon had been formed expressly for this Anabaptist to drown in.” (Voltaire, 2013, p. 107).
Though the example appears extreme, Voltaire wants the reader to grasp how
…show more content…
Both Candide and Zaabalawi show how over thinking and over analyzation causes more problems than they solve. Mahfouz takes a more personal and intimate approach while Voltaire outrageously showcases its rippling effects. Either way, the result emphasizes how letting go of thoughts which paralyze the mind and restrain productivity leads to a responsive, educated and harmonious life, and potentially improving