ipl-logo

Parole Evidence In Prisons

467 Words2 Pages

In the system of corrections, getting parole is very lengthy legal process. It is fill with a procedural process that involves a parole board. The parole board’s job is to determine if an offender has been property rehabilitated to rejoin society. The parole board can deny an inmates application based on their sentence, victim’s testimony, and the presentence investigation report. However, the way an inmate behaves in a correctional faculty is very important as well. Furthermore, in the event a prisoner commits a serious offense in a prison there is an investigation. With most investigations evidence is a very important component to see if there is guilt for the prisoner. The main point is should evidence found in a prison facility be a factor …show more content…

Before, a parole board can even see the case, the evidence that is found must be valid under the constitution. Department inspector general look investigate the case and review the evidence (Walters, pp.1, 2014). They determine if there is any found play. The Fourth Amendment comes into play if the search was not valid. For example, in the case of Hudson vs. Palmer the inmate name Palmer was found with the pillowcase in the trash. He was given the charge of 520, and also a prison disciplinary procedures destroying state property. He also receives a reprimand as well on his prison file (468 U.S. 517 1984). Of course, prisoners can repeal the reprimand. In Hudson v. Palmer the Supreme Court held that prisoners should not expect to have privacy in their cells. This is because the correctional institution can do their shakedowns to keep the institution safe. (Shiffren, pp. 49, 2003). Therefore, the prison can do random searches regardless of how thestate feels about this process. Darlene Goring discusses the case Wolff vs. McDonnell and states that “The Wolff majority, however, added that prisoners' rights may be restricted to accommodate the "institutional needs and objectives" of prisons,” (Goring, pg. 623, 1984). The institutional needs and objectives can be implied as punishing prisoners with loss of good time. Evidence is a word with many meanings, and it can be in different variations in the hearing. “Testimony need not be under oath and hearsay is admissible,” (Boston, pp. 350,

Show More
Related
157 Words | 1 Pages

In Commonwealth v. Newman, 429 PA. 441 (1968), on November 16, 1964, at about 11:30 a.m. four detectives went to appellant 's home with a body warrant for appellant and a search warrant for the premises. The complaint for the search warrant recited that the affiant, Detective John McCrory, deposed that there was probable cause to believe that certain books, papers, and other items used for the purpose of a lottery were in the possession of Henderson Newman at or near 721 West Mary Street. They forcefully entered the appellant 's home without announcement or purpose. The court held that, the forcible entry without announcement of purpose violates the Fourth Amendment. The fruits of an illegal search are inadmissible under Mapp v. Ohio,

Read More
890 Words | 4 Pages

A decision held that under the Sixth Amendment, the defendant’s counsel had not met the standards of reasonable competence required of a defense. Even if a defendant and their family suggested that no mitigating evidence was available, it is required to use reasonable effort in obtaining and reviewing materials that the counsel expects prosecution to use as evidence during sentencing. The reasoning behind this decision argued that Rompella’s trial counsel did not make sensible efforts to examine the files on Rompilla’s prior convictions for rape and assault. The Court stated that the counsel should have known prosecution would present those files to the jury during sentencing, and that the information on Rompilla’s prior conviction would have found mitigating evidence about his mental health, childhood, and alcoholism that could have been used for a proper

Read More
463 Words | 2 Pages

Pp. 5–28. (a) A warrantless search is reasonable only if it falls within a specific exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement. See Kentucky v. King, 563 U. S. ___, ___. The well-established exception at issue here applies when a warrantless search is conducted incident to a lawful arrest.

Read More
1587 Words | 7 Pages

Question 2 In the case of Mapp v. Ohio, Dollree Mapp was at the center of an investigation regarding a search for a potential bombing suspect. The bombing suspect was thought to be residing in Dollree Mapp’s residence. The police originally approached Mapp’s residence and requested permission to search the residence for the bombing suspect, equipment, and gambling equipment. Mapp consulted her attorney, and declined to allow the officers to enter the residence without a search warrant.

Read More
183 Words | 1 Pages

Parole boards in the United States vary from state to state, but in most states, the parole board is selected by the governor with the legislation confirming. The board’s term is between four-six years and five - seven members with terms that allow for renewal. A main responsibility for the board is, “managing parole release processes and making decisions to terminate parole supervision”(Bohm & Haley, 2012, p. 450). The board grants on basis of two types of parole release discretionary and mandatory. The difference in the two paroles are discretionary allows the board to decide to deny or grant the parole, whereas mandatory requires the board to grant parole at a specific time.

Read More
1009 Words | 5 Pages

When Weeks was arrested, police officers entered his home without a warrant by using a key and began searching it for evidence. The officers then turned over evidence to the U.S. Marshals that was used to get a conviction. Weeks appealed the conviction which eventually came to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Court ruled unanimously that the search violated Weeks rights under the 4th Amendment. This ruling also prevented local police officers from securing evidence by ways that are prohibited under the federal exclusionary rule and giving it to federal investigators.

Read More
620 Words | 3 Pages

ARGUMENT I. The District Court erred in denying the Motion to Suppress because the evidence obtained from Assante’s personal laptop resulted from an intrusive, non-routine border search conducted without reasonable suspicion. The Fourth Amendment protects “[t]he right in people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures . . .”U.S. Const.

Read More
829 Words | 4 Pages

United States v. Mark James Knights, 219 F. 3d 1138 Issue: The issue involved in this case is whether the respondents Fourth Amendment rights were infringed upon when law enforcement searched his home without a warrant. Even though respondent agreed to the terms of probation following release, which included searches of his person or premises with or without a warrant (The United States Department of Justice, 2014). Rule: The rule of law in regards to Knights probation conditions following release state that Knights would “submit his person, property, residence, vehicle, personal effects, to be searched at any time, with or without a search warrant, warrant of arrest or reasonable cause by any probation officer or law enforcement officer” (Karagiozis et al., 2005 p. 223).

Read More
596 Words | 3 Pages

Introduction: The United States Supreme Court cases of Brady v. Maryland, Giglio v. United States, and United States v. Agurs all deal with the prosecution's obligation to disclose exculpatory evidence to the defense. These cases establish that prosecutors have a constitutional duty to disclose all evidence favorable to the accused. Failure to disclose this information violates due process and can result in a new trial or acquittal.

Read More
584 Words | 3 Pages

The police violated Wolf’s rights and since there was no warrant for arrest or warrant to search his office the police was trespassing. The police officer who violated his rights was to be punished by his superiors. The judges decided that using such evidence goes completely against the Fourth Amendment which is a basic need to our freedom. States should follow this law but are not directly forced to. States using evidence that should be excluded in their “statute becomes a form, and its protection an illusion,”(Wolf v Colorado, 1949).

Read More
234 Words | 1 Pages

A New York City man named Anthony brown has spent 15 years of his life in prison or on parole. Brown was 16 years old when he was first incarcerated for selling drugs in 2001. Brown has been incarcerated four times for drug crime and parole violations. He’s currently released form prison and is trying to get off of parole. Browns time in the parole system has been much like the process of being revoked and restored.

Read More
645 Words | 3 Pages

While some states followed the Supreme Court in adopting this rule, others stood by the common law rule which allows all evidence to be admissible in court no matter how the evidence was obtained. Throughout the years many arguments have stemmed from the effectiveness of the exclusionary rule. Those in favor of the exclusionary rule believe that it protects people against unnecessary search and seizure, establishes innocence before guilt, and stops admissibility of false evidence. The exclusionary rule requires all law enforcement officers to provide a warrant in the case of search and seizure to protect people’s right to privacy.

Read More
603 Words | 3 Pages

The inner moral compulsion to obey is what drives most social organizations. Sykes (2007) described several structural defects that occurred in the New Jersey State prison. Sykes (2007) argues that power in prison is not based on authority therefore prison officials have to find other means to get prisoners to abide by the rules and regulations. The ability to use force to maintain order on a large scale in the prison is an illusion. According to Sykes (2007), Certain privileges such mailing and visiting, personal possessions, time-off for good behavior etc. are given to the inmate all at once upon his or her arrival to the prison.

Read More
721 Words | 3 Pages

In the criminal justice system, the corrections component is also responsible for the rehabilitation of the convicted individual. It is their duty to attempt to make the defendant a productive member of society once again. Based on the individual’s behavior while incarcerated, the court and corrections officials may decide to place them on parole, which ensures that the individual will comply with the rules of society once they are fully released from the system. The criminal justice system is an essential role in the organizational structure of not only the United States but also in countries around the world. If there were no criminal justice system to administer punishment, the world would be unstructured, disorganized, unjustified, cruel, and not to mention a chaotic place for it citizens.

Read More
927 Words | 4 Pages

Furthermore, the parole system is known to have a multitude of problems laced within it, these problems can be solved by focusing on parolee and parole officer relationships, and partaking in systems that improve the underlying issues. Following through to fix these affairs may seem unrealistic, but a solution could be in sight. Issues within the parole system in the United States include the ineffectivity of parolees meeting with their supervising

Read More

More about Parole Evidence In Prisons

Related Topics

Open Document