ipl-logo

Patrick Lin Here's A Terrible Idea Summary

644 Words3 Pages

Patrick Lin’s article Here’s a Terrible Idea: Robot Cars with Adjustable Ethics Settings discusses the “moral dilemma” (Lin, 2014) that autonomous vehicles introduce into the world. The root of the ethical problem is in the event of an inevitable collision or crash who does the vehicle make the decision to save. The question suggests the concepts of egoism and utilitarianism, (both previously discussed in this course), the different possibilities based on what split-second decision the autonomous vehicle makes, and the fact that there is no easy solution to this dilemma.
In the article, Lin describes the options manufacturers face with an example similar to the utilitarianism “trolley problem” (Lin, 2014) where a car would be set on a collision course to hit and kill five people or it can swerve and only kill one individual. Thus, the manufacturers are faced with a “no-win” (Lin, 2014) situation whereby they can program the car to swerve, …show more content…

Since the usage of non-autonomous vehicles results in unpredictable situations, attempting to structure what would occur in these split-second scenarios is difficult. It also puts heavy responsibility on determining what the ‘right’ decisions are in any situation and on ensuring the “robot cars” (Lin, 2014) will make these ‘right’ decisions. Thus there is no clear answer to this “moral dilemma” (Lin, 2014) and the manufacturers and programmers of these autonomous vehicles must attempt to ensure that the cars will make the best decision in any situation, or in other words attempt to prepare the car for any situation that could occur or give it the means to make a decision in a new “no-win” (Lin, 2014)

Show More
Related
415 Words | 2 Pages

One ethical issue of driverless cars the choice of action when facing an inevitable accident with another party. In this situation, the car has to decide which party to harm. This means the people developing the car software may face the issue of deciding different values or worth on human lives or leaving it to the machine learning software to decide itself. Another issue is whether driverless cars should fully prevent human interaction or still allow humans to control the car if and when they see fit. This may raise the question of whether human error or software error was the cause of any accidents.

Read More
1052 Words | 5 Pages

"The Trolley Problem compels individuals to confront the fundamental moral dilemma of whether it is justifiable to sacrifice one life to save many others" (Shafer-Landau). The central ethical question posed by the Trolley Problem revolves around the morality of actively choosing to divert the trolley, thereby sacrificing one life to save five. Utilitarianism, a consequentialist ethical theory, asserts that the moral rightness of an action is determined by its consequences, specifically its ability to maximize overall happiness or utility. From a utilitarian perspective, the solution to the Trolley Problem appears straightforward: divert the trolley onto the track with only one individual, thereby minimizing overall harm and maximizing utility. By sacrificing the life of one individual to save the lives of five others, the action aligns with the foundational tenets of utilitarianism by producing the greatest good for the greatest

Read More
224 Words | 1 Pages

Robert Peterson’s article, “Will Self Driving Cars Be Good for America?” (2016), asserts that Americans are ready for autonomous cars, and that self-driving cars have many advantages over their counterparts. Peterson first develops his claim by stating that Americans have used autonomous travel ever since horses pulled buggies, and that autonomous travel is not new, it is just better; Peterson then supports his claim by presenting a statistic which states that roughly 32,000 people die each year from vehicular accidents and 93-95% of them are caused by human error, Peterson advocates that self-driving cars would decrease the number of fatalities from such accidents, as the technology of the vehicles would work to avoid these tragedies, and

Read More
977 Words | 4 Pages

And I’m not sure that’s the best thing,” says Oren Etzioni, a computer scientist at the University of Washington and the CEO of the Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence. These situations are terrible, and nobody likes the thought of a car that kills, but these decisions must be made if there is no human being behind the wheel. So why not make them to follow the law. If a person was driving, it’s a reflex to swerve if safely possible. Modeling the car's decisions after human’s reactions is the most ethical way to handle the swerve or hit issue with completely autonomous

Read More
1116 Words | 5 Pages

In the non-fiction article, “Let the Robot Drive”, by Tom Vanderbilt the objective summary is about the pros and con of the future of driving. Tom Vanderbilt explains that driving has quickly changed from manual to autonomous abilities and that this quick growth in a car’s ability, will allow for cars to become smarter in the future. In addition, these autonomous abilities will be better than the human driver in every way. Tom believes this will lead to many positives and negatives for cars and their drivers. For drivers, the believed goal is to distance themselves from active engagement in operating vehicles which allows for more safety.

Read More
492 Words | 2 Pages

The primary audience for my report is TESLA Is it possible that a driverless car can be created without the fear of fatal accidents? Annotated Bibliography Sule, S., Gupta, K., & Desai, V. (2015). AUTONOMOUS CARS: THE FUTURE OF ROADWAYS.

Read More
515 Words | 3 Pages

In this article, Patrick Lin addresses a problem that has, in recent years, come to the the forefront of ethical discussion: The Trolley Problem, and all the stipulations that come with it. The problem itself has existed in many forms throughout the years in the study of ethics, but has recently become much more relevant with the impending widespread adoption of self driving vehicles. Lin’s topic of adjustable ethics settings in these vehicles highlight the absurdity of attempting to find a “correct” solution to this ambiguous problem with no universally accepted answer. From a legal perspective this problem becomes one of liability. Who is responsible for injury, loss of life, or damage of property in the case of an accident caused by a self driving vehicle?

Read More
1787 Words | 8 Pages

As we move into the future, the automotive industry is slowly inching towards fully-autonomous vehicles. It’s important to define fully-autonomous as a vehicle that is capable of driving itself without needing any type of driver assistance, such that the everyone in the vehicle is a passenger. Even though production of self-driving cars has not begun, the discussion of ethical issues surrounding vehicle artificial intelligence has. The range of issues include crash optimization, algorithm transparency for end users, loss of jobs and overall vehicle security. There is a important distinction between crash avoidance and crash optimization, the former is engaged before the latter.

Read More
576 Words | 3 Pages

Thousands of people die from vehicle related accidents. With self driving cars it can stop or continue accidents because we don’t know enough about the technology. There are many good reasons to have a self driving car but we don't have enough knowledge to have them be fully safe. Even though a self driving car could react quicker self driving cars should not be allowed because the car would choose the passengers safety or the pedestrian safety not both, they should also not be allowed because the people’s choices could affect it, and no safety test will make sure the car is safe enough.

Read More
764 Words | 4 Pages

The companies today that are attempting to make self driving cars have had a huge success and this is a good thing because they have found that if the road is occupied only by self driving cars then it would be safer in a number of ways. One reason stated in the article “ The 3 biggest ways self- driving cars will improve our lives,” by Cadie Thompson, is that “ if 90% of cars were autonomous, the number of accidents would fall from 6 million a year to 1.3 million a year.” This would be a drastic change, and would help save hundreds of thousands of lives each year. Also in the article titled “3 reasons you should embrace self driving cars,” by Drew Hendricks, it says that “ there’s no emotion involved, and certainly no distractions.” This means that all distractions

Read More
1252 Words | 6 Pages

Someone may choose to save the people in the backseats, as they are often children, and some may choose to save the person in the driver’s seat. It depends on the individual. This is an issue we may come across. Ethics and morals are very personal. The decision surrounding the ethics of AI may be left to a few select people.

Read More
1488 Words | 6 Pages

Vehicle-to-vehicle communication will transform driving as we know it. It will assist in preventing accidents, reducing traffic, and getting the passenger(s) to where they need to be on time. Autonomous cars will be the future of driving. One of, if not, the most common inquiry people make about autonomous cars is, “how safe are they?”

Read More
1453 Words | 6 Pages

This technology would undoubtedly allow the drivers of the future much more freedom, right? While autonomous cars may seem a viable solution, they offer many unintended drawbacks. For example, although driverless cars may remove the human error of driving, they do not provide adequate decision making. Driverless cars present a moral dilemma upon closer inspection (Lin).

Read More
1019 Words | 5 Pages

Across the world, hundreds of millions or even perhaps billions of people will be safer than ever, more prosperous than ever, and more efficient than ever. Despite, some people will say self-driving cars will foster an environment of less safety, rather than more. They say hackers may be able gain control of cars from the outside. However, this is not true because the sensors on a car can and will be programmed to automatically detect and shut down malicious invaders, through reasons which I actually will explain later. When the next great locomotion revolution comes, everyone needs to be ready to embrace all the benefits and great luxuries which will come with self-driving cars without any hesitation.

Read More
2043 Words | 9 Pages

We have to think about who will be held responsible if something goes wrong and a car accident happens, with the involvement of autonomous cars. If the ethics of this issue disputed enough, and what is it considered to be ethic or not in this field. An autonomous car means that the driver is free of command on the entire journey. The car is responsible for changing lanes, direction, to pull over in cases of need, to accelerate or slow down, according to road conditions.

Read More

More about Patrick Lin Here's A Terrible Idea Summary

Related Topics

Open Document