ipl-logo

Patriot Act 4th Amendment

651 Words3 Pages

On September 11th, 2001, tragedy struck America. A terrorist attack was carried out resulting in 2,753 Americans killed. America became locked in a war, and it needed more security on its own soil. So, congress passed a law known as the Patriot Act. This allowed the N.S.A (national security agency) to gain information of individual citizens or groups of individuals by using library records, phone calls and other surveillance. Recently, on January 1st of 2015 the Patriot Act has expired. Many members of government are stuck in a debate if it should be renewed. It should be reauthorized by Congress again as it already has been twice because it is approved and supported by the Constitution. Even though some argue that the Patriot Act infringes …show more content…

Before federal agents take surveillance and seize phone calls or records from a person they must first have a good reason or evidence to do so. This follows the idea of probable cause listed above. Next, before agents can seize anything they must issue a warrant and have it approved. This way they can’t just see anybody’s information that they want to. Here is a quote from a heritage.org writer on the Patriot Act’s constitutionality. “ No single provision of the Patriot Act has ever been found unconstitutional. This is a testament to the act’s limited applicability, procedural safeguards, and extensive oversight

Show More
Related
567 Words | 3 Pages

The Patriot Act is one of today’s most controversial laws. The law’s official name is the USA PATRIOT Act, which stands for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act. The law was passed in 2001 after the September Eleventh terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center. The act greatly increased the power of the government in preventing terrorism, but it also increased the amount of surveillance that the government performs on citizens.

Read More
953 Words | 4 Pages

This is a clear example that shows that even the most controversial parts of the Patriot Act are not just constitutional, but strongly supported by the Constitution. From this, many see that any attempted claims that the Patriot Act is wrong in the law are based merely on thought. But, there are more than one sections of the Patriot Act that are up for debate. Any arguments against the Patriot Act are destroyed quickly due to the fact that, “no single provision of the Patriot Act has ever been found unconstitutional,” (McNeil). Once again, it is clear that the Patriot Act is constitutional.

Read More
1203 Words | 5 Pages

Debates focus on violations of civil liberties. There are also questions about the appropriateness of the Act because it was passed and signed into law without extensive review. As the United States continues to experience terror threats and attacks, it is expected that the patriot act will continue to take effect. Civil liberties throughout American history have always expanded in peacetime and contracted during emergencies and wartime. During the Civil War, the two world wars, and the Cold War, Congress, and the president restricted civil liberties, and courts deferred.

Read More
369 Words | 2 Pages

The Patriot Act was a legislation that passed that allowed

Read More
699 Words | 3 Pages

“...To explore details of the home that would previously have been unknowable without [going in], the surveillance is a search and is...unreasonable without a warrant” (Doc F). As the government searches homes they begin to forget about warrants and why they are needed. They also forget that there are only four reasons when they can search or seize in a situation. The four reasons are “ hot pursuit, public safety, danger of loss of evidence, permission of suspect” (Background Essay). These are some of the only reasons why law enforcements can search or seize without a warrant.

Read More
419 Words | 2 Pages

The USA Patriot Act was signed into law on Oct. 26, 2001, due to the need for cooperation among all levels of security. Police and other department agencies were given powerful authority and encouraged to share information. This is to meet the goal for a safer America in times of turmoil including international affairs. But as the years have passed and as terrorist attacks seem to cease, people have begun to question if there’s too many restrictions on law enforcement were called off.

Read More
459 Words | 2 Pages

The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides, the ultimate goal of this provision is to protect people’s right of privacy and freedom from arbitrary governmental intrusions. And being searched. Good Thing

Read More
641 Words | 3 Pages

The PATRIOT Act is a defile of Americans civil rights and it needs to be ended. One main reason the PATRIOT Act needs to be stopped is that it's a huge invasion of privacy. Most Americans keep very sensitive and important information on phones, and it's likely that that information will be discussed over the phone where the government has access to anything said during these calls. The private lives of American citizens is not what the government should concern themselves with.

Read More
205 Words | 1 Pages

Many Americans feel that their privacy is being invaded, due to the fact that this act allows phones to be taped and records pulled, plus the ability to intercept Internet messages. The Patriotic Act has taken away our liberties, it gives federal government unprecedented power to monitor phone calls and emails of U.S. citizens without a warrant. It allows for bulk collection of Americans metadata.

Read More
260 Words | 2 Pages

The fourth amendment makes it hard for Law enforcement conducting investigations to get information that could be very useful. The apple company gets thousands and thousands of information requests that they are legally not allowed to share,and a large portion of the requests are from people whose devices have been lost or stolen. Additionally, lots of times Apple says no to the information requests, and even once Apple is approved to give personal material they still share a minimal amount of data, however Apple does collect a minimal amount of data. The patriot act allows certain exceptions having to do with terrorists to be made when finding information, and they are very helpful to law enforcement, but only in terroristic situations. Furthermore the amount of information that the Patriot act allows investigators to get for terror crimes just shows how much information we could be getting about horrific criminals that are not yet in jail.

Read More
138 Words | 1 Pages

The Fourth Amendment the Search and Seizure amendment was first passed by Congress on September 25, 1789 (National Constitution Center) that states the right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures (National Constitution Center). For the first one hundred years after this amendment was This amendment of the Constitution has been used by both civilians and governmental officials as proof of why they believe an incident that occurred was fair, or unfair. However, there have been times when deciding the fairness or unfairness has not been crystal clear. For instance, the case of Tennessee v. Garner that was first argued on October 30, 1984, and later decided upon on March

Read More
1189 Words | 5 Pages

In 2008, President Bush signed into law The FISA Amendment Act, an act which allowed the government to monitor Americans’ electronic devices. Bush claimed that this Act could help save lives, as mentioned before, but what he did not mention is that this allows the government to conduct surveillance without probable cause. (“How the NSA’s Surveillance Procedures Threaten Americans’ Privacy.”) When people heard about this, they became concerned, and many began to question if the NSA would abuse this power.

Read More
163 Words | 1 Pages

Immediately following the attacks on September 11th, many governmental reforms were enacted to ensure the safety of American citizens. Aside from the drawn out TSA checks and prolonged war, another modification was made concerning Americans ' "wellbeing". The Patriot Act was adopted just a month following 9/11 and it essentially gives the United States Government the ability to help prevent acts of terrorism. This law has grown very controversial in this newly digital age because it gives the government access to not only our personal phone calls but our social medias, which didn 't exist 15 years ago when the law was passed. We sign away our privacy in exchange for being digitally connected to each other and protected by the government.

Read More
948 Words | 4 Pages

The Fourth Amendment affirms that "people are secure against unreasonable searches and seizures, no Warrants shall issue, describe the place to search, and the persons or things to be seized. " There should be a warrant for everything if what a person is being charged for is risking their rights as a U.S citizen. For example the privacy of a citizen is safe under the Fourth Amendment. Second, the property belonging to U.S citizens is secure from search and seizure without a warrant. Third, due to the Fourth Amendment, any citizen is safe from unfair arrests.

Read More
1479 Words | 6 Pages

The USA PATRIOT was an act that passed in the aftermath of 9/11, increased power to the Justice Department agencies by allowing intelligence from the American people to become more attainable. The act was designed to protect America from any foreign harm from terrorist through the expanded tools and power necessary for the executive branch. At the time, people accepted the fact that it was necessary for the nation to access everyone’s information to prevent any more attacks against the USA. As time passed on, many people began questioning whether the government had overstepped its boundary. In the article “Audit: NSA repeatedly Broke Privacy Rules”, published by the Washington Post, Barton Gellman shows how the government misused the power through these lines.

Read More

More about Patriot Act 4th Amendment

Related Topics

Open Document