ipl-logo

People Fight Against Animal Rights

1010 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Reasons why animal testing is wrong

Many people fight for animal rights. They demand that animal testing should be banned. They think that it is very unethical and wasteful. With the development of technologies, people think that animal testing is archaic, and there are many alternative ways. Often animal testing fails, and it is cruel to play with their lives. However; animal testing saves not only lots of people's lives, but also animals’ too. It is very important and even necessary for having a healthy environment, without diseases. It is unethical to keep animals in laboratories and make them suffer from pain. However, animal research is highly regulated with laws, and any unjustified action will not take place during the testing. All proposals to use animals for research must be approved by an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) set up by each research facility. Researchers are under the surveillance by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International (AAALAC). Even sometimes researchers propose themselves to be watched during the research (Should Animals Be Used On Scientific or Commercial Testing, 2014). The laboratories are …show more content…

They should be considered equal with man. Traditionally, people thought that they are superior, and animals are just food. However, Singer says that women and black people also had issues with superiority; they were treated like second-class citizens, or even worse. As we know traditionally they were discriminated, they were considered not smart; so why is that now they have equal rights with other people? If they have equal rights then why animals cannot? (Singer, 1989). However, as I have mentioned before, animals do not have cognitive abilities. They cannot learn our human languages and express their thoughts. They cannot fight for equality as women, and black people did because they are

Show More
Related
532 Words | 3 Pages

This principle applies to all animals, not just those that are cognitively similar to humans. Regan believes that animals' interests should be taken into account in the same way as human interests, and that it is wrong to prioritize the interests of humans over those of animals. Regan also addresses the objection that animals do not have moral standing; they are not capable of fulfilling moral obligations nor engaging in moral actions compared to humans. He argues that this objection is based on a narrow and flawed understanding of moral standing, which sees it as dependent on cognitive abilities and actions. Regan affirms that moral standing should not be tied to cognitive abilities or actions, but understanding that moral standings is heavily influenced by inherent

Read More
340 Words | 2 Pages

My objective is to address this question working within a utilitarian perspective. I believe that there are two main reasons why is important to address this problem within the utilitarian approach. First, utilitarianism has proven to be a great tool in the animal rights movement. The 'equal consideration of interest for all who can experience pleasure and pain' is a simple and powerful maxim to defend the need to transform the way we treat non-human animals. Even if Peter Singer did not start the animal rights movement, he was the one who popularised it.

Read More
1401 Words | 6 Pages

Animals carry an important role throughout human lives every day. Humans look to animals for numerous things such as: pets, a means of production, food, entertainment, experimental means, etc. Many animals carry human like traits, which raises many arguments and different positions on the subject of whether animals deserve rights while others feel that animals are simply animals, but may have certain interests that humans are obligated to respect. The issue is that many people confuse the terms animal rights and animal welfare when there is a fundamental difference between the two that revolves around the rights that humans have to use animals. There are many animal rights organizations including but not limited to: Best Friend’s Animal Society, The Humane Society of the United States, and the largest animal’s rights movement, People for Ethical

Read More
268 Words | 2 Pages

Purpose: To inform the audience about animal testing I. Introduction A. Attention getting device: Approximately 26 million animals are used every year in US laboratories for cosmetic and biomedical research. B. Thesis: I would like to inform you about how animal testing is conducted. C. Credibility: I have read and studied the articles about animal testing. D. Preview: I am going to share with you purposes of animal testing, how animals are used in laboratory tests, and the effectiveness of animal testing.

Read More
799 Words | 4 Pages

Animals need to have support, because after the testings done they die or look awful. Their skin is patchy or they can not see or hear anymore. Animals need to feel safe and that is where humans should advocate the rights for

Read More
223 Words | 1 Pages

The physical suffering and discomfort that animals test subjects experience during research that are frequently faulty, limited, and expensive are the factors that advocates for stronger animal rights fight to end. Each day that an animal is subjected to animal testing is another day that they suffer. The test subjects become nothing but a prisoner to the scientists and researchers. Animals in laboratories are permitted by law to be “burned, shocked, poisoned, isolated, starved, drowned, addicted to drugs, and brain damaged” all for scientific research (“Cruelty to Animals”). As stated prior, once the experiments are over the animals either die or are thrown back into their confined cages or stocks and used for a later experiment.

Read More
821 Words | 4 Pages

Animal Bill of Rights Is it moral for animals to be victims of abuse? The Animal Legal Defense Fund has created an Animal Bill of Rights petition to the United States Congress. The Animal Bill of Rights includes the following rights: the right of animals to be free from exploitation, cruelty, neglect, and abuse, the right of laboratory animals not to be used in cruel or unnecessary experiments, the right of companion animals to a healthy diet, protective shelter and adequate medical care, the right of wildlife to a natural habitat, ecologically sufficient to a normal existence and a self-sustaining population, the right of farmed animals to an environment that satisfies their basic physical and psychological needs, and finally the right of animals to have their interest represented in court and safeguarded by the law of the land (Animal Bill of Rights). Animals should have

Read More
1152 Words | 5 Pages

Animal testing simply means the use of non-human animals in experiments, which indeed arouse great controversy in recent years. More and more people think that human being’s benefits can’t outweigh animals’

Read More
1139 Words | 5 Pages

Animals in Research and Testing According to PETA, the animals who are in research and testing “shake and cower in fear whenever someone walks past their cages and their blood pressure spikes drastically. After enduring lives of pain, loneliness and terror, almost all of them will be killed,” (“Animal Testing 101”). Animal-testing is the use of non-human animals in research and development projects, especially for purposes of determining the safety of substances, such as foods, beauty products, and/or drugs. Although animal research plays a crucial role in experiments focused on disease treatments and preventions, it is cruel, inhumane, and should be stopped. This is an act that should be banned and prohibited in all states and countries

Read More
398 Words | 2 Pages

Researchers estimated over 26 million animals were used for scientific tests and commercial testing subject every year in the United States. Over the years animals were used to be tested on medical treatments, products for human uses, health care, and etc. The practice of researching on living animals has started since 500 BC. Opponents of this act say that it is cruel to experiment on animals, there are other methods available to replace the cruel act of experimenting on living animals, and that the human bodies and animal’s bodies are totally two different features and the research often yields irrelevant results. The federal Animal Welfare or AWA passed the animal testing act in 1966 and amended in 1970, 1976, and 1985.

Read More
594 Words | 3 Pages

We have to be the voice that will be heard. We have to be the advocates they never had. Animal testing is not only wrong for morals but humanly wrong. Yes we get advantages, but what price does that come with? Are we going to go as far as putting animal in extinction for our own benefit.

Read More
796 Words | 4 Pages

The Animal Welfare Act (AWA) of United States gives some protections to warm-blooded animals used in research laboratories, which only cover 5% of animals normally used for testing. Under AWA, all testing on animals which are covered must minimized the pain on animals and provide appropriate veterinary care. The AWA should make further improvements which cover as much animals as possible. In UK, the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 defined regulated procedures as animal experiments that could potentially cause "pain, suffering, distress or lasting harm”. It prevents animals from unnecessary suffering.

Read More
967 Words | 4 Pages

Animal testing is a phrase that most people have heard but are perhaps still unsure of exactly what it involve. Whether it is called animal testing, experimentation or research, it should be defined as all testing methods on animals including, medical exploration, cosmetics, toxicology trialing, and psychological examination involving animal subjects. It is used to assess the safety and effectiveness of medications and beauty products as well as understanding how the human physiology works. While supporters believe it is necessary practice, those against animal testing believe that it involves torture and suffering to animals. Medical research is the hardest case of proposition in the debate whether animal testing should be banned or not, since it has previously yielded substantial benefits for humanity.

Read More
1084 Words | 5 Pages

In 1789 Jeremy Bentham, one of the very first animal rights activists, argued that animals should be treated with equality due to the fact that they are sentient. Meaning that not only are they aware of perception, but receptive to

Read More
859 Words | 4 Pages

It is true that animal testing requires a lot of investment. Not only that money is spent on advanced technologies, it is also spent to pay for scientists’ expertise on this particular field. In order for the scientists to do their research, they need suitable equipment and substances. Every year, the National institutes of Health finances between $12 billion to $14.5 billion on animal testing as indicated in a study done by the government (Bastach, 2013). Besides, scientists need to consider the fact that animals need to be sheltered, fed and cared for to keep them alive.

Read More

More about People Fight Against Animal Rights

Related Topics

Open Document