Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Animal testing in research
Cruelty in animal testing
Animal testing cruel to animals
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Animal testing in research
Cruelty in animal testing
Animal testing cruel to animals
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Studies show that with all of the animal experimentation that has been done, most of them were inhumane, unreliable and had violated the Animal Welfare Act of 1966. This act ensures that animal care for research is a main priority. It is also required to have appropriate veterinary care, housing, feeding, handling, sanitation, ventilation, and sheltering. For some, animal experimentation is “supposed” to help human beings use certain products for their own benefit. What people do not realize is that these animals have rights and that their rights are being more than violated.
Imagine being in a room, where pets were being tortured by getting burned, being injected, having wires put inside them, being poisoned, etc... How would that make you feel? Doesn't sound like the best experience, right? Well, for most animals that are involved in Animal Testing, this is what happens to them... well...pretty much all the time. Even worse, it’s almost always against their will.
Over 6,000,000 dogs and cats were killed on US roads last year. Shocking? Your heart crushes when you hear that number about your fur babies that are at home. Well, each year 100 million animals die from animal testing each year. If you hate so much that animals are dying on the roads by accident, why can’t we do something about animals that are dying in the hands of our people?
Animal Testing, also known as Animal Research or Animal experimentation, is often an incredibly cruel process for the animals
These animals should not have to face the reality that all they are is science experiments. Animals involved are forced to go though this since they don't have a voice, they need us, you wouldn’t just leave your own child to be experimented on would you? Many animals are also tortured and killed just to benefit Humans. There are other ways experiments can go on without the need for animals. As anyone could see Animal testing should conclude for its harsh
Most of the animals that are experimented on during testing are either terminated or held in captivity. A mistake many people make made about animals that were used for testing is that they give them up for adoption or release them in the wild this is not right and humane for many reasons most animals that are used for testing have never been in a home environment there for they would not be able to cope with people. also a animal that was being experimented on will not know how to survive in the wild because it's probably been held in captivity all of its life so it won't know how to find food and shelter and will probably end up starving to death. There are other ways animals can be handled after testing one way is they can be killed using
Animals are subjected to excruciating experiments daily. Countries such as Israel and India have stopped animal testing as well as Britain. “…countless animals are experimented on and then killed…” (Murnaghan 1). Animals are subjected to confined rooms all of their lives, used in painful experiments and then disposed of as if they are an inanimate object.
Animal Testing Laws and Impacts Isabela Nolasco Hewlett High School AP Seminar: 10th Grade Mrs.Wagner December 21, 2022 Animal testing could be controversial because of the potential cruelty to animals. The government over the years has recognized this and has attempted to put laws and policies in place, and formed committees to prevent animal cruelty in the animal testing. But at times these committees and laws are not the strongest or well enforced to be able to do so. Therefore, animal testing has not been stopped or limited.
Animal testing gets overlooked in today’s society, nobody realizes the negative effects of it. The public also doesn’t know what goes on behind their backs during the processes of scientific research. Vets may claim that the animal testing is being done for scientific research but ninety percent of the animals that are tested in the US labs are not included in the official statistics of animal testing (“11 Facts about Animal Testing”). It wouldn’t be a problem if the testing wasn’t affecting the animals but is has became cruel and inhumane to them in many ways. Animals used in experimenting are normally forced inhalation, forced feeding, and prolonged periods of physical restraint (“Should Animals be Tested for Scientific or Commercial Testing?”) .
Mankind shares a psychological phenomenon known as reason where it is “the intellectual ability to apprehend the truth cognitively, either immediately in intuition, or by means of process of inference.” (Philosophy pages) Humans being gifted to be given such ability to be able to go through reasonable circular thinking may in turn be burdened by questions. Such vary nature of reason, even if it means to surpass all powers, cannot be ignored nor answered. (Kant, 7)
Testing on Animals For many decades, using animals for testing has become one of the many controversial topics. Experimenting on animals can be beneficial but can be misleading when an animal has a different response than a human. Animals have as much rights as humans do but are still being violated. And even when there has been laws and acts passed to protect them, they are still being used in many laboratories in the United States.
There is a debate on whether or not scientists should test human products on animals. Not only does the testing on these animals do more harm than good, but also humans and animals are not physically and genetically the same. Testing human products on animals should not be allowed. Testing on animals can cause harmful side effects. Some tests are known for “immobilizing rabbits in full-body restraints while a substance is dripped into their eyes or smeared onto their shaved skin” (Product Testing: Toxic and Tragic).
They can feel physical pain like humans when subjected to these methods of testing, as well as display human like emotions such as depression, anxiety, fear and more. The animals that are exposed to toxins and chemicals can also become deformed along with their offspring. Supporters of animal testing might say that animal testing is needed for scientific research and medical purposes. They would say that it’s better to have done the testing on animals rather than humans. Since starting animal testing medical and scientific research has come a long way.
During animal testing, many animals are killed after experimenting on them and the others remain alive with injuries and in captivity. 95% of the animals tested are not protected by Animal Welfare Act including mice, fish and birds and they are all suffering abuse and mistreatment. Even with the protection provided by the Animal Welfare Act, some horrific cases of animal abuse in the laboratories wasn’t prevented. Some people also find it immoral to test and experiment on animals for the human benefit saying that animals have feelings and do suffer like humans which makes it unfair to experiment on them what cannot be experimented on humans only because they do not have the ability to express their feelings. However, animal rights supporters only oppose scientists but not the farmers who kill animals daily for food but call the scientists cruel for killing animals for the advancement of medical field although, 99% of animals killed are by farmers while only 1% are by scientists (Ian, Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing?).
Even if the animal was not harmed during the experiment, many of the animals used must be killed at the end of the experiment. Millions of animals were used in animal testing, which means that millions of animals were killed by animal research. If we were to vastly reduce animal experimentation, many behaviorally abnormal animals, often mice or rats, might be readily moveable into the pet trade. Even if the opposition counterargument, that animals lack the capacity to truly suffer, is believed, research should none the less be banned in order to prevent the death of millions