Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The negative effects of animal testing
Introduction for animal testing
Why animals testing is inhumane
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Did you know that millions of animals suffer in the U. S. just because of animal testing? When these animals are getting tested, they feel pain, but cannot react to it because they cannot speak up. To begin with, animal testing is not effective. Many animals do not get all of the same diseases that humans get.
If some countries have come up with the idea to take care of animals and have made even groups and organizations against animal abuse why do, they inhumanly abuse animals for testing. Experimental tests on animals its something unessential, and what if results are erroneous and in animals works perfect and on human results badly. As well, we know that the human body its pretty similar to an animal's body. Some doctors say that animal testing can slow down he results for a research or for a product.
This methods enables human volunteers to participate in research. It can provide information on the safety of a drug. Volunteers are given a small one-time dose of a drug that 's high enough to cause a cellular effect but low enough to affect the body. They use sophisticated imaging to monitor how the drug behaves in the body. With microdosing benefits include being able to safety test on humans and get more accurate results.
All these scientists need for their job is to have human test subjects that request it and then can test on them. I highly restrict using animals for this because of how inhuman it is. Humans will be 99.9% the
The scientist leaves the chemicals up for weeks on the without painkillers, while the rabbits bleed and eyes swell up. Most likely after
I personally appreciate utilitarianism because it makes sense to do what is best for the group or that which produces the most happiness. In my opinion, it is considered so radical because of its collectivistic approach in a more individualistic culture. Furthermore, it goes against religious doctrine since it does not follow a defined doctrine that dictates whether something is right or wrong. While I appreciate its logic, I do not agree with the utilitarian stance on all issues.
“They experience ongoing mental and physical suffering from the endless boredom. Confinement, fear, and emotional stress of daily laboratory life. Add to this fear and agony of a procedure, and only then can we start to understand the desperation and pain in which they live, every day—and for most, their entire lives.” (New
The physical suffering and discomfort that animals test subjects experience during research that are frequently faulty, limited, and expensive are the factors that advocates for stronger animal rights fight to end. Each day that an animal is subjected to animal testing is another day that they suffer. The test subjects become nothing but a prisoner to the scientists and researchers. Animals in laboratories are permitted by law to be “burned, shocked, poisoned, isolated, starved, drowned, addicted to drugs, and brain damaged” all for scientific research (“Cruelty to Animals”). As stated prior, once the experiments are over the animals either die or are thrown back into their confined cages or stocks and used for a later experiment.
Protection Animal testing is cruel and inhumane, it should not be acceptable to use animals in scientific research. Vivisection is another term for an animal experimentation including; dissection, administering drugs, brain damaging, and other painful and invasive experiences to animals. According to Humane Society International, animals used in experiments are subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation("Testing - American Anti-Vivisection Society.") Animals are very different from human-being therefore it can make a poor scientific results. They should not have to suffocate and die to be use in research and cosmetics testing because there are alternative choices and different techniques that could lead to the
Introduction Animals testing have significantly contributed to the advancement of scientific knowledge in general and to biomedical progress specifically. Many example showing that laboratory animals in medical development and other aspects have significantly influenced human health and reduced suffering, for example improved diagnosis of infectious disease (Hau, Jann, Schapiro & Steven, 2002). But since 1960s and 1970s, animals testing protests has gained prominence and strength, people start to argue is it moral to continue “cruel” animal testing. Animal Testing is a Moral Act In the rest of this article, I shall apply different concept under utilitarianism try to discuss whether animal testing are moral acts. It is important to notice that (1) in this article, applying the general idea of utilitarianism which is “the greatest happiness of greatest number” and (2) the animals testing under the rules and regulations.
It is encouraged that these products be tested by doctors to ensure its safety. Mosquito repellent, for example, must go through animal testing to evaluate the toxicity of the product before it is to be sold in the United States and Europe. Statistics say that Americans generally consume around 340 chickens for every animal that is being researched or tested on. This does not measure up to how many animals are killed for our consumption. People get really defensive over animal testing, but what they do not fully comprehend are the benefits it brings us.
Millions upon millions of animals are killed mercilessly every year due to these experiments. “Most animal experiments are not relevant to human health, they do not contribute meaningfully to medical advances and many are undertaken simply out of curiosity and do not even pretend to hold promise for curing illnesses” (Animal). Not only does this testing waste animal lives, but humans as well. Because animal testing is so ineffective, many humans have contracted illness, irritations, mental problems, etc. because of these drugs being successful on animals and not humans.
There has been over a million animals that have been tested, and some have died because of the medicine they have been exposed to. If many of the animals have died, then the people that work for the hospital or the vets have to get those dogs, and get rid them. The people would have to get more animals that are nice and healthy. There are many scientists who believe their work can’t be complete without animal testing. Many people think that animals should be tested because some substances may be harmful to humans if not thoroughly tested for safety.
Also there is the LD50 Test: A toxicity test used in animal testing that is performed until 50 percent of the animals are dead. Animals should not be required to be tested on before the use of a medical drug, cosmetic, or food additive. The use of animals in cosmetic experiments is immoral and wrong. The immoral and wrong practices can be shown through “the use of bunnies to test eye irritation to make sure the makeup is safe for humans, though testing is not required by law.”
Animal testing is a phrase that most people have heard but are perhaps still unsure of exactly what it involve. Whether it is called animal testing, experimentation or research, it should be defined as all testing methods on animals including, medical exploration, cosmetics, toxicology trialing, and psychological examination involving animal subjects. It is used to assess the safety and effectiveness of medications and beauty products as well as understanding how the human physiology works. While supporters believe it is necessary practice, those against animal testing believe that it involves torture and suffering to animals. Medical research is the hardest case of proposition in the debate whether animal testing should be banned or not, since it has previously yielded substantial benefits for humanity.