ipl-logo

Animal Testing On Animals

335 Words2 Pages
There is a debate on whether or not scientists should test human products on animals. Not only does the testing on these animals do more harm than good, but also humans and animals are not physically and genetically the same. Testing human products on animals should not be allowed.
Testing on animals can cause harmful side effects. Some tests are known for “immobilizing rabbits in full-body restraints while a substance is dripped into their eyes or smeared onto their shaved skin” (Product Testing: Toxic and Tragic). The results of these tests include a variety of skin and eye problems such as ulcers and blindness (Product Testing: Toxic and Tragic).
Animals and humans do not respond in the same way. Less than two-percent of human illnesses
Show More
Related
724 Words | 3 Pages

The tests can be misleading. Some chemicals that are harmful to animals prove valuable when used by humans. In fact aspirin is dangerous for some animal species, but we use it all the time. Another drug Fk-506(tacrolimus) was almost cancelled because of animal test results. I don’t think we should use animals for testing because they may be close to our liking but their results can’t determine if a drug is safe or

Read More
490 Words | 2 Pages

Should scientists be allowed to test products intended for human use on animals? Do you have a furry little friend that you love? If so then you too can understand why animal testing for human products is cruel and unnecessary. Some do not realize what happens to animals who get tested for the products that you use. Once you understand the facts about animal testing you to will feel bad for these furry little guys and want to stop this abuse.

Read More
834 Words | 4 Pages

“Hey mom can you make some chicken tonight? No, son remember our government enacted the new animal bill of rights.¨ this is a conversation that one would not want to partake in because of how absurd soundsWell we are not far from a day where one would be participating in such a conversation due to the fact that people are trying to approve an Animal Bill of Rights. The Animal Bill of Rights would cause a lot of controversy and problems in the future. Animals do not deserve an Animal Bill of Rights due to the fact that: animals are a large source of our food, animals are needed to apply research based tests on, and lastly the Animal Bill of Rights should not dictate how we treat the pets that we own Humans have interacted with animals for years, but this Animal Bill of Rights will change the way we interact with them.. A common

Read More
223 Words | 1 Pages

The physical suffering and discomfort that animals test subjects experience during research that are frequently faulty, limited, and expensive are the factors that advocates for stronger animal rights fight to end. Each day that an animal is subjected to animal testing is another day that they suffer. The test subjects become nothing but a prisoner to the scientists and researchers. Animals in laboratories are permitted by law to be “burned, shocked, poisoned, isolated, starved, drowned, addicted to drugs, and brain damaged” all for scientific research (“Cruelty to Animals”). As stated prior, once the experiments are over the animals either die or are thrown back into their confined cages or stocks and used for a later experiment.

Read More
951 Words | 4 Pages

It is still not right with many advanced technologies today, there should be an alternative route instead of testing on animals, human could be the one to volunteer for simple experiments. In glass testing, such as studying cell cultures in a petri dish, can produce more relevant results than animal testing because human cells can be used. ("Scientific Alternatives to Animal Testing: A Progress Report.") There are micro-dosing, giving small doses to test for any reactions, and human could be volunteered for the experiment, and then the blood are analyzed after the small doses onto the skin.("Scientific Alternatives to Animal Testing: A Progress Report,") There are artificial human skin, such as the commercially available products EpiDerm and ThinCert, is made from sheets of human skin cells grown in test tubes or plastic wells and can produce more useful results than testing chemicals on animal skin.

Read More
499 Words | 2 Pages

Animal testing has been an ongoing debate for hundreds of years. I have done research on the benefits and withdrawals of animal testing. What you guys may believe is right might be different than the person sitting next to you. I will be talking about the failures of testing, he benefits, and what supporters and opponents say about whether or not animals have the same rights as humans. There has been many failures of animal testing.

Read More
131 Words | 1 Pages

The terms animal testing, animal experimentation, animal research, in vivo testing, and vivisection have similar denotations but different connotations. Literally, "vivisection" means the "cutting up" of a living animal, and historically referred only to experiments that involved the dissection of live animals. The term is occasionally used to refer pejoratively to any experiment using living animals; for example, the Encyclopedia Britannica defines "vivisection" as: "Operation on a living animal for experimental rather than healing purposes; more broadly, all experimentation on live animals,” although dictionaries point out that the broader definition is "used only by people who are opposed to such work.” The word has a negative connotation,

Read More
604 Words | 3 Pages

Animals are obviously different than humans, and many drugs/cosmetics react to animals and humans react differently. Because animals and humans are so different tests are not accurate and then humans are affected in turn. “The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has noted

Read More
65 Words | 1 Pages

In the data as shown above, animal testing should be banned. Animal testing can lead to the death of the animal. Also animal testing is inhumane because of the treatment, and living conditions. Although, animal testing can lead to advancements in the medical field it has failed more than succeeding. Imagine being the animal trapped in that cage, make them change and ban animal testing.

Read More
1866 Words | 8 Pages

Henceforth, as animal testing increased, so did the controversy surrounding it (“Animal testing,” n.d.). Moreover, with the help of animal testing, various treatments and medicines are developed for unconventional diseases. Although animal testing may seem ruthless, animals are used for experimental research that contributes to science if there are no other possible substitutes. Animal testing is a debatable topic that still continues to be one until this time. Animal experimentation should persist because it saves human’s life from diseases, ensures cosmetics’ safety, and improves medical

Read More
1402 Words | 6 Pages

The aim of this paper is to analyse and compare cosmetic brands that are testing on animals and those who are not. It contains a first part about the ethical question of why companies test on animals. Secondly, there is an explication on what can be done against animal testing. Finally, the companies that use or do not use animal testing are mentioned. To conclude, a recommendation will be given on how they can prevent animal testing in the future.

Read More
1611 Words | 7 Pages

Mankind shares a psychological phenomenon known as reason where it is “the intellectual ability to apprehend the truth cognitively, either immediately in intuition, or by means of process of inference.” (Philosophy pages) Humans being gifted to be given such ability to be able to go through reasonable circular thinking may in turn be burdened by questions. Such vary nature of reason, even if it means to surpass all powers, cannot be ignored nor answered. (Kant, 7)

Read More
1296 Words | 6 Pages

Introduction The aim of this essay is to analyse and compare cosmetic brands, which export their products to the Netherlands that are testing on animals and those who are not. It contains a first part about the legal rights in the Netherlands. Secondly, the attention is addressed to the biggest animal foundation (PETA). Lastly, the companies that use or do not use animal testing are clarified as well as the ethical questions of why companies test on animals.

Read More
967 Words | 4 Pages

Animal testing is a phrase that most people have heard but are perhaps still unsure of exactly what it involve. Whether it is called animal testing, experimentation or research, it should be defined as all testing methods on animals including, medical exploration, cosmetics, toxicology trialing, and psychological examination involving animal subjects. It is used to assess the safety and effectiveness of medications and beauty products as well as understanding how the human physiology works. While supporters believe it is necessary practice, those against animal testing believe that it involves torture and suffering to animals. Medical research is the hardest case of proposition in the debate whether animal testing should be banned or not, since it has previously yielded substantial benefits for humanity.

Read More
431 Words | 2 Pages

All animals are different in some way. This could mean tests on animals could be misleading. Certain chemicals could be bad for animals yet good for humans, or vice versa. Animal test are much more expensive than using a human for tests. Humane Society International has compared animal tests with in vitro counterparts.

Read More

More about Animal Testing On Animals

Related Topics

Open Document