Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
The history of animal testing
Essays on animal testing
History on animal testing for a persuasive essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The history of animal testing
Essays on animal testing
History on animal testing for a persuasive essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In this essay, I will be arguing why utopias are not enjoyable to those who live it, only to those who create it. There are many examples of utopias that are awesome for whomever created it, but horrendous for those who must survive there. The House of the Scorpion, “The Most Dangerous Game”, and Adolf Hitler’s utopia were all great for the creator, but not the citizens who must get through the harsh conditions. In The House of the Scorpion, El Patrón creates his own utopia in Opium.
The animals are forced to endure drug and chemical testing that can harm them. According to the People For The Ethical Treatment of Animals Organization, “Examples of animal tests include forcing mice and rats to inhale toxic fumes, force-feeding dogs pesticides, and dripping corrosive chemicals into rabbits’ sensitive eyes.” In addition, the New England Anti-Vivisection Society stated, “Animals in labs suffer not only pain from protocols, but also severe stress from day-to-day laboratory life. They spend their lives in barren cages, unable to make choices or express natural behaviors. Most never experience fresh air or sunshine, only bars and concrete.”
The new standards stated that three requirements had to be satisfied: (1) “the voluntary consent of the person on whom the experiment is to be performed,” (2) “the danger of each experiment must be previously investigated by animal experimentation,” and (3) “the experiment must be performed under proper medical protection and management” (Washington, 2006, p. 221). These standards were violated when doctors injected Elmer Allen, a black man who had escaped the South and made a good life for himself and his family in Chicago, with plutonium-238 (Washington, 2006). Plutonium-238 is an even more intensely radioactive isotope than plutonium-239, which was given to most of the other patients (Washington, 2006). Allen suffered a similar experience
The Epic of Gilgamesh, The Iliad and The Odyssey are epic works. The main characters, Gilgamesh, Achilles and Odysseus, from the three legends portray excessive pride as seen in the poems. Their extreme pride trait makes them arrogant, as a result, they can hardly handle any situation correctly with honor, as required. In all the three epics, pride is depicted as a destructive force that not only destroys the individual but the whole society.
Vivisection is the act of cutting into something that is alive. Imagine walking past the Park Science building and hearing the screams from a puma that was being prodded at by a group of lab students here at Simmons College. The idea of vivisection makes the stomach curl. However in the 19th century the concept of vivisection was not nearly as taboo as it is today.
Some say that animal experimentation is good for us but is it good for the animals? Animal experimentation is cruel to the animals but not many people can see that because all they are thinking about is themselves. People use animals to test human products on them to see if they would be good for us but how do the animals feel when we hurt them like that? Animals are our companions and they were always meant to be our companions but lately the most they have been used for is animal testing.
Is Animal Testing Justified Ethically? The idea and processes of animal testing and experimentation originated thousands of years ago. Back then it was only used for medical research and curiosity. Nowadays, animal testing and experimentation is used for a wide range of things; determining the effectiveness of a cancer treating drug or if a cosmetic product causes skin or eye irritation.
Protection Animal testing is cruel and inhumane, it should not be acceptable to use animals in scientific research. Vivisection is another term for an animal experimentation including; dissection, administering drugs, brain damaging, and other painful and invasive experiences to animals. According to Humane Society International, animals used in experiments are subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation("Testing - American Anti-Vivisection Society.") Animals are very different from human-being therefore it can make a poor scientific results. They should not have to suffocate and die to be use in research and cosmetics testing because there are alternative choices and different techniques that could lead to the
Introduction Animals testing have significantly contributed to the advancement of scientific knowledge in general and to biomedical progress specifically. Many example showing that laboratory animals in medical development and other aspects have significantly influenced human health and reduced suffering, for example improved diagnosis of infectious disease (Hau, Jann, Schapiro & Steven, 2002). But since 1960s and 1970s, animals testing protests has gained prominence and strength, people start to argue is it moral to continue “cruel” animal testing. Animal Testing is a Moral Act In the rest of this article, I shall apply different concept under utilitarianism try to discuss whether animal testing are moral acts. It is important to notice that (1) in this article, applying the general idea of utilitarianism which is “the greatest happiness of greatest number” and (2) the animals testing under the rules and regulations.
Animal Experimentation: Is it Beneficial? Animal testing, otherwise known as vivisection has been around prior to the 19th century, in fact, in 1973 there was already a total of over 1,500,000 animals being experimented on. Britain was the first to stand up against animal testing, stating that it was cruel in 1876 with the Cruelty to Animals Act. America on the opposing hand, launched an animal testing boom in the first quarter of the twentieth century when cosmetic animal testing began when totals reached over 1,300,000 animals tested. The animal testing controversy has been a big one, it is no way beneficial to society nor is it humane for animals.
In conclusion, society’s attitude towards animal testing is quite balanced. There is not one particular research where society is all for or against the subject of animals in medical research. Over the past 20 years many individuals attitude has change as some are beginning to show support for testing as they have seen the now breakthrough’s that are helping critically ill patients. Medical research has not particularly been affected by society’s attitudes, research has become more stronger over the years as individuals are beginning to see the breakthroughs and results from the testings, this has been shown in surveys by Pifer (1994) and Corwin (1999). There need to be more consideration for further research on society’s attitude toward
Animal testing has been used by scientists to test drugs and makeup products for many years. They have been kept in labs, poked, prodded at, observed, forced to inhale, eat, and wear substances that have killed them. Millions of animals have died each year because of this testing, and it needs to be stopped. Animal testing should not be continued because it is ineffective, it wastes lives, and is inhumane. Animal testing needs to be discontinued because it is ineffective.
In the data as shown above, animal testing should be banned. Animal testing can lead to the death of the animal. Also animal testing is inhumane because of the treatment, and living conditions. Although, animal testing can lead to advancements in the medical field it has failed more than succeeding. Imagine being the animal trapped in that cage, make them change and ban animal testing.
aAnimals play a huge role in human society in many different settings such as commercially or in the media and many more. This can be beneficial to humans however in the long run this can be damaging to animals and their lives. In this report I will discuss how animals are used in human culture and the effect it has on their welfare. Animal testing and Fur production Firstly, there are many different ways animals are being tested on every day, whether it’s cosmetic or medical.
For decades, humans have used animals for their own benefit without taking into consideration that animals have feelings. How would you feel if one day someone captivated you and used you as an experiment? Before cosmetic companies sell their products they test them on animals to make sure they will not cause any damage or harm to the customers skin regardless of the injuries they cause to the animals. Just like any human being animals should be protected from any harm because they have feeling. Animals should be able to live in their natural habitat without fear of being captivated and tortured.