ipl-logo

Persuasive Essay About Animal Testing

788 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The effect of animal testing

Imagine you are smelling the flowers and are enjoying life. But, when you turn around there are people with a net ready to snatch you up. You spend the rest of your life crying out in pain, loneliness, and horror. When you go in for a test again, you are in pain, but then there is a pang of pain greater than the others. Soon the numbness kicks in and you are floating. Everything goes black. You are just another casualty. Animal testing has harmed many animals who don’t have a choice in whether or not they are hurt. For example, it is basically animal abuse and their deaths are awful. Also, how to change it simple and more accurate. Sure, many people believe that animal testing has helped many people and has had many breakthroughs. But, when …show more content…

There are countless ways to not test on animals. Science has broken through in many ways, one of the ways is to grow cells that act they exact same way in a lab. Also if you would prefer, you can grow a whole organ. These options provide a realistic test. Many people are willing to donate for the sake of happier and better lives for these animals. Also, scientists can use donated tissue for a better alternative. Computers are also a better way of testing. People can program the computer to act like anything, but more specifically organs or cells. Furthermore, machines, such as cat scans, can scan people safely and mimic their vitals. All of these tests accurately mimic human vitals 90% of the time (Alternatives to Animal Testing). Why would you use animal testing if there is a better, more accurate way?
While some may say that animal testing is awesome and should be used for the rest of our lives because it appears to have helped many medical breakthroughs. Nevertheless, it turns out that it has not helped medical research breakthroughs. Some evidence to prove my reason is that the polio vaccine was delayed 40 years by monkey tests (33 Reasons Why Animal Testing is Pointless). People could have used different alternatives to animal testing. Plus, most are more effective and help many more breakthroughs than animal

Show More
Related
282 Words | 2 Pages

Animals may have similar body functions, but they can be prone to and resistant to different diseases which makes them unreliable to be tested. For example, cancer was cured in mice years ago, but human cancers are yet to be cured. This clearly shows that animals need to not be tested because of health and body differences. In addition to body functions, animal 's DNA are different than a human being’s.

Read More
643 Words | 3 Pages

Animal Testing has been a very controversial topic for decades. Throughout history, animal testing has played a major role in leading to many new medicines and discoveries. Most of the world participates in these experiments, with the aims of achieving the most modern technologies. Animal testing needs to be continued to advance our science and medicines, and to continue to save millions of lives.

Read More
967 Words | 4 Pages

Yet, there are other alternatives that now exist and can replace the need for animals such as in vitro testing, in silico models, and human volunteers. Scientists now do not have an excuse to harm any of these creatures.(Peta) Animal research and experimentation has been practiced since at least 500 BC. The ‘modern’ era of

Read More
534 Words | 3 Pages

Yes, we did but the intended purpose of this whole thing was to cure cancer for humans not animals. This might sound like a far-fetched idea but is one to consider. We have seen this idea in films, a couple are Planet of the Apes, 21 days Later, I am Legend, although they are considered Sci-fi no one really knows what happens in a science-lab they only release the information after the experiment which is the correct way if you use the scientific method which I’m sure everyone is familiar with. My Next argument against Animal Testing is the morality of all of this why would someone want to kill or Harm something that doesn’t have any problems with it at all. They have to use a healthy animal to start off with to use as a variable to notice the effects of their testing, this is not fair nor right to the animal.

Read More
883 Words | 4 Pages

There are alternatives to animal testing. In vitro (test tube) test methods and models based on human cell and tissue cultures, computerized patient-drug databases and virtual drug trials, computer models and simulations, stem cell and genetic testing methods, non-invasive imaging techniques such as MRIs and CT Scans, microdosing (in which humans are given very low quantities of a drug to test the effects on the body on the cellular level, without affecting the whole body system.) All these far more humane than causing such pain to so many animals. When using such techniques we can achieve medical breakthrough, discovery and further our knowledge in many industries without the expense of animals. Animal testing is archaic.

Read More
888 Words | 4 Pages

The rabbits can suffer from redness, bleeding, ulcers, and even blindness. This is testing shampoo and soap and other things you might get in your eye and what happens when you don’t. Acute Toxicity: This is used to test the danger of a chemical when exposed to it by making an animal eat it putting it on its skin of inhalation. For decades, large amounts of animals were poisoned in a lethal dose test that killed more than half the animals. Another test is called acute toxic class method using a small number of animals, but having terrible side effects like excruciating pain, convulsions,loss of motor function and/or uncontrollable seizures.

Read More
999 Words | 4 Pages

Animal testing had been occurring for centuries. It can be dated back to the ancient times of the Greeks and Romans. Physicians would dissect animals with the interest to obtain knowledge. One physician said that he would rather use a pig because he wanted to avoid seeing an unpleasant expression of an ape. Humans do not want to think of animals as on the same level of us.

Read More
516 Words | 3 Pages

The labs can use a method using reconstructed skin cells. Not only will this stop testing on animals, this test will be highly more accurate, and the more accurate the better. There is another method called microdosing, basically what this is, is when a human is given a very small one time drug dose. Then sophisticated imagining techniques are used to monitor how the body reacts. By using any of these methods we will cut back on animal testing and have highly more accurate results.

Read More
604 Words | 3 Pages

Now-a-days we even have some alternatives to animal testing, which is ethical and lead to more conclusive data. Animal experimentation gives us misleading data, is unnecessary and inhumane. Animals of all species are subjected to tests that leave them mutilated or even kill them. Some are injected with horrible chemicals then are left in their barren cages to suffer. Others are administered terrible deceases that slowly kill them.

Read More
882 Words | 4 Pages

Technology is advancing, and the need for animal testing has vanished. There are several alternate methods that are much more effective than using rats or monkeys, not to mention cheaper. Studying cell structures in a petri-dish, micro-dosing, artificial human skin, and computer models have all done away with the need for animal testing. These methods have proved to be more successful, due to the fact that actual human cells are used rather than that of a difference species. These methods ensure safety for all animals, find cures and treatments, and save our country loads of

Read More
500 Words | 2 Pages

Animal testing has been around for decades and is an issue that has yet to be solved. Susan Scutti who is an author from the Medical Daily websites would give descriptions of living animals have been found in ancient Greek have been performing experiments to animals from the early 500 BC. Scientists such as Aristotle and Herophilus performed experiments to discover the functions of living organisms of animals. Spain first introduced animal testing as an experimental method for testing surgical procedures before applying them to patients. An article from the Heart Views states that “During the early 19th century sheep's where the first animals to be tested with vaccines in order to experiment diseases.

Read More
495 Words | 2 Pages

 Animal testing is mandatory for human existence.  Animal testing helps develop life saving cures, animals also benefit from it, and some products must be tested on animals before they can be released in stores. First,  according to the text, “ Animal research has also contributed to major advances in understanding and treating conditions such as breast cancer, brain injury, childhood leukemia, cystic fibrosis, malaria, multiple sclerosis, tuberculosis and many others” (Should Animals Be Used 3).  These life saving cures and treatments have made life easier. Imagine how many more cures we could have with animal testing.

Read More
1038 Words | 5 Pages

Animal testing is cruel and immoral because, approximately every year one million animals die from having experiments on them for different types of cure for human’s diseases. One solution is to stop the animal testing. One of the alternatives is The Non-Invasive technique and Vitro testing. ´ ´I am not interested to know whether vivisection produces results that are profitable to the human race or doesn’t the pain which it inflicts upon unconsenting animal is the basis of my enmity toward it, and it is to me sufficient justification of the enmity without looking further

Read More
463 Words | 2 Pages

A very good example of why we need to test on animals is the Thalidomide Disaster. In the 1950s-60s The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ran tests to determine if it was safe to use. The Thalidomide drug was given out to pregnant women to help cure morning sickness. Instead of helping, it killed many babies, and approximately 15,000 babies were born with limb defects. This drug was tested on animals, but all the necessary test were not ran to insure the safety of consumer.

Read More
859 Words | 4 Pages

It is true that animal testing requires a lot of investment. Not only that money is spent on advanced technologies, it is also spent to pay for scientists’ expertise on this particular field. In order for the scientists to do their research, they need suitable equipment and substances. Every year, the National institutes of Health finances between $12 billion to $14.5 billion on animal testing as indicated in a study done by the government (Bastach, 2013). Besides, scientists need to consider the fact that animals need to be sheltered, fed and cared for to keep them alive.

Read More

More about Persuasive Essay About Animal Testing

Related Topics

Open Document