ipl-logo

Animal Testing On Animals Essay

1296 Words6 Pages

Introduction
The aim of this essay is to analyse and compare cosmetic brands, which export their products to the Netherlands that are testing on animals and those who are not. It contains a first part about the legal rights in the Netherlands. Secondly, the attention is addressed to the biggest animal foundation (PETA). Lastly, the companies that use or do not use animal testing are clarified as well as the ethical questions of why companies test on animals. To conclude, a recommendation is given on how they can prevent animal tests.
Legal rights in the Netherlands
The right to test on animals or to sell animal tested cosmetics are forbidden in the Netherlands. In fact, it has been forbidden in Europe since 2013. However, a lot of cosmetic companies export their cosmetics outside (of) Europe. Those cosmetics often arrive in China because the legal rights in China do not forbid cosmetic companies to test on animals. In contrast, it is mandatory to test on animals before selling cosmetics on the Chinese market in order to ensure the safety of the products. (International, EU ban on cosmetic testing, 1898)
The most important foundation that support animals
“The People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) Foundation is a worldwide charity dedicated to establishing and protecting the rights of all animals.” …show more content…

Biotherm, La roch posay, Maybelline (part of L’oréal group), Bobbi Brown, Clinique and Mac (part of Estee Lauder) state on their website that they are against animal testing and only do it when it is required by law. This means, they do not test on animals but they sell their products on the Chinese market and under Chinese law it is mandatory to test on animals, so these companies let other parties test their products on animals. (Carleen S. ,

Show More
Related
302 Words | 2 Pages

We are so lucky to have animals in the world. I mean, what better living creatures to use than rodents, rabbits, guinea pigs and hamsters for experimentation. Several popular beauty and cosmetic brands including Maybelline, Avon, Rimmel London, Covergirl and even Dove, test their products or ingredients on animals. Regardless of this having effects on their sales, companies perform this act for our safety and so that our mascaras don’t make our eyelashes fall out or our shampoos won’t make us bald. Most importantly, it’s done for proof when injured customers sue.

Read More
830 Words | 4 Pages

It states that "No person shall use any animal for testing of cosmetics", and that those who defy this law, will face action as per provision of the Drugs and Cosmetics and Animal Cruelty Act. The punishment is a term of 3 to 10 years and or a fine of 500 to 10000 rupees. In Canada, we are still looking to pass the Cruelty-Free Cosmetics act to officially "ban cosmetic animal testing in Canada and the sale of cosmetic product and ingredients that have been newly tested on animals outside of the country. " It is hard to believe that India has passed the law before Canada as "approximately 35% of Canadian households have a dog", and are recognized to treat pets as family. Some of the most notable beauty brands that test on animals in China are Estee Lauder, Avon, Clinique; Maybelline, Nars, and Elizabeth Arden.

Read More
1779 Words | 8 Pages

Welcome to Zpak.com (the "Company") Web Site (the "Site"). Your access to and use of the Site is subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth in this Agreement. PLEASE READ THIS AGREEMENT CAREFULLY BEFORE ACCESSING THE SITE. BY USING THE SITE, YOU WILL BE ACKNOWLEDGING THAT YOU HAVE READ THIS AGREEMENT AND AGREED WITHOUT LIMITATION OR QUALIFICATION, TO BE LEGALLY BOUND BY THIS AGREEMENT ANDTHE TERMS OF THE Zpak PRIVACY POLICY.

Read More
510 Words | 3 Pages

Rent Seeking occurs when a company, organization or an individual spend their own wealth on political lobbying to obtain economic gains which are beneficial to none apart from themselves. The distinguishing features of Rent Seeking activities are: • Influences government policies to the benefit of the rent seeker • Discourages productivity in the economy • Just involves redistribution of surplus from one party to other i.e. no creation of wealth • Negative Sum Game: Real GDP falls as no creation of value + administrative costs to the government which is an added expense Rent Seeking has several unfavourable implications. Some of them are: • Income Inequality: Surpluses of the weaker sections of the society are transferred to the stronger sections • Lower efficiency: Greater incentives to rent-seek and being profitable rather than being more productive and profitable. • Reduced Competitiveness: leads to high prices due to monopoly power of suppliers

Read More
891 Words | 4 Pages

It is terrible that we take advantage of animals to test on for products like make-up, shampoo, household cleaning supplies, etc. In Europe there is a lot of public support for the banning of animal testing. The United Kingdom banned animal testing for cosmetics in 1990, but France, one of the most influential nations in Europe is against the

Read More
401 Words | 2 Pages

A YouTube video for 2006 that PeTA made (www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QRBcHIIsXc ) made it clear that animal testing is bad. Animal testing for any form of pharmaceuticals or cosmetics is a form of animal abuse and needs to be

Read More
1502 Words | 7 Pages

In the industry exist different ways to test products and are free-cruelty This means that the products are not tested in animals. The article "About Cosmetics Animal Testing" by Humane Society International mentions what is animal testing and the reasons of why a lot of companies still testing products in animals when it is not required, and when exists different methods to test products without animals. "If companies simply stuck to using the many thousands of existing cosmetic ingredients available, they would never have to animal test. " Companies, laboratories, pharmacies, and a lot of more organizations already have thousands of ingredients that already are acceptable in the commerce, that can be used in products.

Read More
705 Words | 3 Pages

Utilizing animal testing has made everyday life safer for humans. Many of the products that we use each day have been tested on animals to ensure that they are safe for us humans. At this point in time the only things that are allowed to be tested on animals are called “special cosmetics” which includes things like hair regrowth, sunscreen, and antiperspirants. While things called “non-special cosmetics” are no longer aloud to be tested on animals, like makeup products shampoos, soaps, and cleaners. Other products that have been used on animals first to make sure they are safe for humans are medications.

Read More
1339 Words | 6 Pages

Every year all over the world, animals are blinded, force fed chemicals, genetically manipulated, and killed in the name of science by cosmetic companies and scientific centers. Animal testing is a controversial issue that is a process with the goal of promoting the wellness and health of humans but also involves harming innocent animals. Animals have been victims to experiments that were done to ensure the safety of either cosmetic or medical products for humans produced by famous cosmetics companies and scientific centers. Opposing parties to the elimination of animal experimentation say that animals must be used instead of humans, as it is more humane to sacrifice creatures other than humans. Meanwhile, others stress on the equivalence between

Read More
1614 Words | 7 Pages

Are you wearing makeup right now? Using some type of product like hair gel or cologne? There is a pretty high chance that it was tested on animals before it got to you. Cosmetic testing is defined as a way to test the safety and hypoallergenic properties of products for use by humans. Many big brands like Victoria’s Secret and Maybelline sell their products in China, where foreign products must have been tested on animals.

Read More
535 Words | 3 Pages

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration does not explicitly require cosmetics to be conducted animal experiments before sales, but they will advise manufacturers to determine the safety of their products through reasonable testing methods. In China, it is legal to carry out animal experiments on cosmetics. Products that are neither pharmaceuticals nor cosmetics are also tested on animals to ensure that the product does not harm the user. Both the EU and the United States stipulate that toxic substances such as anti-mosquito agents must finish the toxicological testing on animals before sales. If animal experiments are undone, such products cannot be sold on the shelves, and there is no way to protect humans from malaria or dengue

Read More
693 Words | 3 Pages

Afterall, as the FDA studied, only 8% of tests are approved to work on humans. So, of the 92% humans are the test subject. The first person to ever use a product is the very first of the human race to use it, and it is not obligated to work. Conclusion Cosmetic animal testing is expensive, wasteful, and an untrustworthy

Read More
916 Words | 4 Pages

Bath and Body Works, Urban Decay, and Victoria 's Secret are examples of companies who don’t use animal experimentation in their cosmetic products. It 's possible for these name brand companies to continue to produce makeup and earn lots of money without the need of animal experimentation because of all the sophisticate technologies available today. One of the very effective alternatives to animal testing is artificial human skin that can be grown in test tubes. This product is sold by many businesses and is proven to produce results that are easier to understand and more dependable. Additionally, this

Read More
1142 Words | 5 Pages

If a regulatory body demands it for its safety or regulatory assessment, an exception can be made." (Elcompanies.com, 2018b) While cosmetic testing on animals was banned in certain countries, China passed a law on 30 June 2014 to eliminate the requirement for animal testing of cosmetics. (Ly, 2015) This law forced all brands who wants to enter the China market will need to go through this cruel procedure.

Read More
1225 Words | 5 Pages

This proves how immoral it is to test on animals especially since the law does not require the cosmetics to be tested. The most plausible answer for why the animals are being tested on is a business wants to make money and if the business cosmetic is unsafe and harms one human then no one is going to want to buy another cosmetic from that business. This could leave a business with no

Read More

More about Animal Testing On Animals Essay

Related Topics

Open Document