ipl-logo

Animal Testing Satire

401 Words2 Pages

Animal testing is a form of animal abuse , but no one sees it that way. Animals are tested on daily, for “our sake”. So we hurt innocent animals when we can get willing humans to do the same thing they’re doing? Animal testing hurts animals, inside and out. All animals are sensitive creatures of god and don’t deserve the torture us humans put then through. As Alonzo once yelled in one of his videos “this is misogyny.” As you can see, the damages of animal testing anywhere. Cosmetic scientists, doctors testing new meds, etc. there are multiple photos and videos on the aftermath of animal testing and how they treat the animals. It is, in fact, animal abuse/neglect what they are doing, so why aren’t they getting charged like the rest of the people who hurt animals? …show more content…

“if we cant test on humans, we have to test on animals. They’re practically useless any way.” Now if animals could talk, I bet they’d say the same about us sometimes. We can not test on humans, because the “chemicals” lead to death. But what does it lead to in the animals? Pain, misery, and a slow death they did not deserve. According to Peta, animal testing is worse than we think. Most people think its not that bad, but when you actually see with your own eyes, you’ll understand it is very bad. Peta is an animals rights group that tries to fight against animal abuse/neglect. They do a good job, but I feel they go a little too far with unimportant things, like veganism/vegetarianism , instead of actually important things, like the dog eating contest in china or teens putting fireworks in their animals mouths. A YouTube video for 2006 that PeTA made (www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QRBcHIIsXc ) made it clear that animal testing is bad. Animal testing for any form of pharmaceuticals or cosmetics is a form of animal abuse and needs to be

More about Animal Testing Satire

Open Document