ipl-logo

People V. Smith Case Summary

893 Words4 Pages

In the Supreme Court of Michigan, in the case of the People v. Smith (Ricky Franklin Smith), Smith was charged with breaking and entering a building with intent to commit theft. (Wesoloski, 2011) Smith agreed that he had broken a window to gain entrance into the Pontiac’s warehouse, and removed property without permission. (Wesoloski, 2011) At the time of this incident Smith was considered an adult and sentenced to three and one-half to ten years for breaking and entering; however, the sentence was vacated when Smith was convicted to serve six to thirty years as a habitual offender, for his fourth offense. (JUSTIA US Law, 2018) Researching Smith’s arrest history included twelve juvenile violation and inaccurate adult offense history. Even though Smith pleads guilty to breaking and entering and being a habitual offender, fourth offense; Smith filed a motion for resentencing alleging his presentence report file contained …show more content…

Smith’s juvenile records included seven prior felonies and three misdemeanors, which a judge ruled to protect society Smith will serve his sentencing concurrently with other sentencing. The Supreme Court observed that one panel of Courts could not use juvenile records for sentencing and on the other hand some Courts use juvenile records such as felonies which cannot be set aside for sentencing efficiently subverts MCR. (JUSTIA US Law, 2018) Therefore, law enforcement agencies may continue to use expunged records against defendants to their prejudice. The second issue with Smith’s case included that expungement can only be enforced before the age of twenty-seven, which an individual has been an adult for purposes of criminal penalty for ten years. (JUSTIA US Law, 2018) “A defendant’s juvenile court history may reveal a pattern of lawbreaking and response to previous rehabilitative efforts” (JUSTIA US Law, 2018, p.

More about People V. Smith Case Summary

Open Document