Amidst the Classical Era, a time-period in which some of the greatest technologies and communications were introduced, reigned a multitude of empires. Two specific empires were of the greatest to have ever existed: the Persian Empire, which lasted approximately 200 years, and the Maurya Empire, which fell after about 150 years. Individually, the empires had their own accomplishments and their own legacy, however, there existed key similarities and differences between the three empires, especially politically. The Persian Empire utilized a bureaucratic system where the empire was divided into multiple sections, similarly, the Maurya Empire used a system that fractionalized its empire. Nevertheless, the two empires differed in their religious …show more content…
Noticing that the empire had grown to a size that was uncontrollable by one leading power, the Persians disassembled the empire into satrapies─small portions of the empire that were monitored by regionalized magistrates, called satraps. These satraps, typically due to their relationship with the king, were appointed to overview a satrapy, and to collect taxes or men for war. Comparably, the Maurya Empire recognized the ever-increasing need for a new system of control, thus the Mauryans separated the empire into multiple provincial structures, in which spies, disguised as common townspeople, would enforce the law as well as collect taxes. Both the Persian and Maurya Empire deemed it necessary, due to the rapidly growing enormity of their empires and the consequential receding amount of control that their bureaucracies had, that they needed to be broken up into different sections. These sections, in both empires, would be monitored by the king’s appointees, allowing the king to neglect simple tasks that he would otherwise have to do, which, in turn, would slow each empire’s overall progress, and instead focus on larger issues that would not only benefit the entirety of each empire, but would also allow for progress to