Personal Assessment Of Personal Inventory

1621 Words7 Pages

The Personal Assessment of Personal Inventory (PAIR) was developed in 1981, by Schaefer & Olson to evaluate the authentic and ideal levels of intimacy in relationships extending in several different areas. (Kathleen, 1998) The theoretical basis or goal of the scale is to provide therapists’ with awareness about couples over a series of significant intimate areas and give insight to the couple about themselves as well as their partners wants, needs and desires. “The PAIR can be used for all types of dyadic relations including friendships, dating, premarital, cohabiting, and marriage relationships. (Centore, 2012) The Personal Assessment Inventory is being used as a couple assessment tool in premarital and marriage counseling, as well as a …show more content…

They emphasized that normative information is not appropriate for the PAIR instrument because it is the discrepancy between the ideal and actual levels for each dimension for husband and wife that are important and should serve as a basis for counseling work. Little guidance is provided, however, on how to evaluate the discrepancies between real and ideal levels for husband and wife other than a statement that a discrepancy of less than 5 points between the husband and wife 's perceptions is probably inconsequential. Otherwise, the counselor and clients are left to their own devices to interpret the results. The reliability of the perceptions on the various dimensions is not very high, ranging from .70 to .77 with a mean of .726. This is, however, about as high as one can expect from scales that consist of six items. The reliability of the Conventionality (lie) scale is .80. In their 1981 article, the authors report that no test-retest information was available.
According to, Constant (2016), studies have also reported gender differences in the meaning of intimacy. Numerous women define intimacy as love, affection, and expression of heartfelt feelings, while men express it as a sexual behavior and physical closeness. In addition, gender differences are …show more content…

Marriage and Family Therapist, and AAMFT members have an obligation to be familiar with the AAMFT Code of Ethics and its application to their professional services. Lack of awareness or misunderstanding of an ethical standard is not a defense to a charge of unethical conduct. (Caldwell, 2015) While utilizing the PAIR instrument, it important for therapist to understand while intimacy is the topic of discussion, it is important not to get involved romantically with client or client’s family members in any way. Having sexual relationships with a client(s) will violate AAMFT’s code of Ethics 1.4 Sexual Intimacy with Current Clients and Others that states sexual intimacy with current clients or with known members of the client’s family system is prohibited and code 1.5 Sexual Intimacy with Former Clients and Others that states sexual intimacy with former clients or with known members of the client’s family system is prohibited. (Caldwell,