ipl-logo

Personal Narrative: My Road Trip To Sacramento, California

695 Words3 Pages

Across the Country
There will be a journey from Sacramento, California to the state capital of Madison, Wisconsin. This journey will be taken by 4 very different individuals. of course, they're my team vessel for this road trip is a tanky little van built to use as little gas as possible with no flattering to its physical Beauty. Of course, they go over the things they need for when they are up on the trip up. The seminar they plan to intend involving many things from proper police conduct to ways to quicken legal proceedings. There will also be many different experts speaking on numerous different professions from presiding in the courtroom as a judge to being an officer bringing in the many people under his rule.
The man who planned this entire trip and was speaking at the event was Cora Walton a judge from The local district period as a man of 80 years of age he is looked at as one of the wisest men of his years. His head seemed to shine as if it had been polished. His gray beard was long and yet properly trimmed. He had his ceremonial robes and his trusty gavel always at the ready. Being an elder who found somebody's they're still baffled because of fellow colleagues. The driver of the car and …show more content…

Junpei has been good friends with the police cadet since they were both members of the Cepaeas Community High School. He has a very simple style of dress with a plain gray form fitting shirt and a black jacket half open at all times. His brown hair cascaded down the sides of his face giving his angular chin the ability to stick out if you look at him for the briefest of seconds. He has dull brown eyes that make his cynical look all the more potent. As his high school’s valedictorian, he had gone to his personal university of choice, Betale Sarloc University, to study law so he can become a good defense lawyer. He wishes to visit this seminar to learn some good debate

Show More
Related
983 Words | 4 Pages

One of the wrongfully convicted she introduces to her readers is Thomas Sophonow, an innocent civilian “accused of murdering a young waitress” simply because of his physical description coincidentally matching the culprit’s description but more importantly, the procedures that took place when the witnesses were provided with images of possible suspects was outrageously flawed due to faulty witness memories. While Sophonow was eventually acquitted after serving four years in prison, Commissioner Peter Cory says Sophonow is “psychologically scarred for life” as he had to face the four years of suffering in prison and also carry the burden of being wrongly labeled as a criminal as he reintegrates with the rest of society. Sophonow’s co-workers shows evidence of fear against him as they believed he is a “murderer who had gotten off on a technicality.” At a Christmas party, his family would be left isolated from the rest of the co-workers also for the same reason. Loftus wants her readers to be aware of this situation and how it has harmed a family psychologically.

Read More
462 Words | 2 Pages

THE THEME AND THEORY People of the jury, this case is about a man who failed to do his job. This man didn’t to do his job properly because he had the belief that the alleged rapist wouldn’t have a fair trial regardless of the evidence he may or may not found. PARTIES

Read More
980 Words | 4 Pages

Juror 2: He is an introvert who works as a bank clerk. Meek and high in agreeableness, he cannot hold an opinion of his own and adopts the opinion of the last person who has spoken. He seemed happy when he managed to help during the timing of recreating the ‘old man walking’ scene.

Read More
2052 Words | 9 Pages

“All rise,” a sexy baritone voice announced from the black muscle-bound Bailiff as he continued speaking to the brimming courtroom gallery, “The Superior Court is now in session. Honorable Judge Ricardo Sandoval presiding. Docket Sixty-Nine: Rutherford vs. Kim. Please be seated.” At the defense table, the legal counsel of Rearin sat with the Defendant alone until a chirp of the back courtroom door exhibited a tidied up Conor McKinley, whose stroll to the defense table was observed by the jurors in the box.

Read More
891 Words | 4 Pages

Part One, titled “Who Shall Judge Me?” began following the police officer, who was the first to respond, to the scene of the crime. The scene he responds to turns out to be an unequivocally horrific murder of a young housewife and mother in their own home. After addressing the crime scene, Wishman pauses away for the first of numerous times to begin telling the story of the accurate legal steps that correspond to this crime. He depicts how a group of people are first summoned to appear as a juror, which is done by the prosecutor’s office sending out a large amount of prospective juror questionnaires. Everyone who receives a questionnaire must fill it out, or pay a monetary fine.

Read More
1559 Words | 7 Pages

To be certain, they feel that “you could consider special marks on his face and body, but their significance could only be established by witnesses who recollected the person earlier”(Davis 63). The witnesses are expected to have detailed visual recollections. The justice committee is influenced by legitimate identities within a specific community but also strives to provide a fair trial. The reader can relate this

Read More
196 Words | 1 Pages

Over the summer I traveled to Tennessee to see my cousins. The day we arrived, we visited Lake Winnie, an amusement park with tons of rides with a water park. It was a joyful day. That day I went on the first roller coaster I 've ever been on. While walking nervously up the steps to get into line with my cousin, I felt the adrenaline rushing through my body, and I felt very anxious.

Read More
596 Words | 3 Pages

Juror #3's inability to separate his personal grievances from the case blinds him to the possibility of reasonable doubt and obstructs his capacity to consider alternative viewpoints. It is through intense conflict and introspection that Juror #3 ultimately confronts his prejudice and reevaluates his

Read More
218 Words | 1 Pages

Coming to Cal was great for me because it was the first time I had found a real LGBTQ community. Growing up I always moved schools so most of my friendships were fleeting and upon settling for high school the Gay Straight Alliance club was extremely small so coming to Cal provided a great sense of community and belonging. The summer before my first fall semester, I took a few classes to get a feel for the campus which ended up coinciding with Obergefell v. Hodges and SF gay pride which is where I made a lot of friends. Whether it is going for drinks in the Castro, dressing up for the Folsom street fair or going to social events at Oscar Wilde, Cal has provided an amazing sense of acceptance and a safe space. During the spring semester, I preformed

Read More
545 Words | 3 Pages

I have lived in East Oakland my whole life. To the majority of people, the mention of East Oakland evokes thoughts of violence, shootings, and gangs. I was one of the people who believed in these stereotypes, and for a particularly long time. I was one of the people who saw Oakland as a wasteland, a place with nothing to offer me, and a place I had nothing to offer to.

Read More
805 Words | 4 Pages

Upon entering the chamber he realizes the defendants have been drinking coffee with the judge. Jerry, begins to explain to Jan that if the city well water was contaminated then he doesn’t have a solid case. Therefore the case should not continue. The judge agrees with Jerry, at this point Jan disagree and try’s to negotiate with the judge that case should continue, because the families want to testify. The judge then suggest that he will present the jury papers with simple questions to determine if the case continues.

Read More
873 Words | 4 Pages

Juror number 5’s empathetic emotions allowed him to forget the stereotypical judgment that he had towards the teenage boy upon his low class status. However, this WOK can be

Read More
534 Words | 3 Pages

What does paternalism mean? Paternalism is the interference of a state or an individual with another person, against their will, and protected or motivated by a claim that the person delayed with will be better off or protected from harm. The issue of paternalism rises with respect to limitations by the law such as anti-drug legislation, the required wearing of seatbelts, and in medical contexts by the suppression of relevant information concerning a patient’s condition by physicians. At the theoretical level it raises questions of how persons should be treated when they are less than fully rational.

Read More
1404 Words | 6 Pages

The script introduces the viewers to the typical behavior and the state of mind of these jurors, who surprisingly turn out to be the last to change their opinions from “guilty” to “not guilty”. Juror#3 the frustrated father whose personal conflicts and experiences influence his view of the accused’s crime is very desperate to make it clear that his mind is already made up before the deliberations even start. Similar

Read More
1206 Words | 5 Pages

Even though some took more time and effect than other, a decision was made. In the movie analysis, I will be discussing the how many personalities, moralities, and more contributed to the negotiation and resolution. The most distinctive juror in the movie was Juror eight. This is due to the many different negotiating tactics that he uses. One in particular that got my attention was his motive of appealing the people’s empathy.

Read More

More about Personal Narrative: My Road Trip To Sacramento, California

Related Topics

Open Document