Throughout history, boxing has been a widely popular sport, drawing in millions of viewers globally. However, due to its highly violent nature, there is an ongoing debate about whether boxing should be outlawed due to the physical harm it inflicts on its participants. Despite its entertainment value and profitability, it is essential to consider that boxing should not be permitted, as it poses significant risks of brain damage and long-term health consequences for boxers, as well as promotes and glorifies violence.
Several studies have found that repeated blows to the head, which are inevitable in boxing, pose a substantial risk of brain damage and long-term health consequences for boxers. These injuries include chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), dementia, and Parkinson's disease, which are irreversible and can significantly reduce the quality of life of the boxer. Thus, the evidence strongly supports the argument that boxing should not be allowed, given the severe risks of brain damage and the long-term health consequences that boxers face.
By its very nature, boxing celebrates aggression, domination, and physical superiority over others, thus promoting and glorifying violence. This can have negative impacts on young
…show more content…
The sport generates billions of dollars in revenue each year, and it has a massive fan base that enjoys watching the sport and rooting for their favorite boxers. However, this does not justify the physical harm that boxers endure in the sport. Furthermore, there are other sports and forms of entertainment that can provide similar levels of excitement and enjoyment without the same level of risk of injury and harm. Thus, this counterargument reinforces the thesis that, despite its popularity, boxing should not be permitted due to the significant harm it poses to boxers and the promotion of violence it