ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Affirmative Action

1068 Words5 Pages

Affirmative Action is a policy favoring those who tend to suffer from discrimination, especially in relation to employment or education. “I’m not one that believes that affirmative action should be based on one’s skin color or one’s gender, I think it should be done based one’s need, because I think if you are from a poor white community, I think that a poor white kid needs a scholarship just as badly as a poor black kid”(Watts). If you are going to give a destitute, colored kid a scholarship, why can you not give one to someone who is not colored and is also poor. If people are going to use this action, make it civil for all, not just others based on their race and or gender. This is why Affirmative Action is denied on multiple times and is …show more content…

This involves more people into affirmative action and is just making humans jump into conclusions. This is why it is a no good action. “...It presupposes that all people of the same skin color are from the lower class, and therefore need help.. This reinforces stereotypes and even embeds them permanently into the system”(www.mytholoke.edu). Stereotyping is an immense cheat in my point of view. It makes people be more biased and get enraged over the slightest things, based on Affirmative Action. It is relevant to know this because humans have the tendency to label society and Affirmative Action gives them another reason to do so. “Any time a program is made it allows someone to have a position. That's when a minority of stereotypes is made. Even if humans are qualified, affirmative action bring the idea that people have more attention brought to them due to their color, or their gender. For anything to succeed, you need an equality viewpoint”(Richard). When people try and take advantage of being colored and try to make it to where they are making themselves look like they are the “top” people because they get to have opportunities that non-colored people do not have, is not being parallel and is very unfair. When society starts seeing others do something out of the ordinary or unusual, they are going to take action and most of the time it is not going to be good. Furthermore, it is important to look at this in an equal manner because

Show More
Related
1556 Words | 7 Pages

In Ira Katznelson’s book, When Affirmative Action Was White, he establishes a clear, understood meaning of affirmative action. In this text, affirmative action is best described as policies enacted around the mid-1900s that required traditionally marginalized minorities to be in spaces (such as classrooms, workplaces, and sports teams) to help level the playing field. Essentially, affirmative action policies sought to give benefits to minorities as compensation to alleviate past ills. The book’s title, however, seems to flip this definition on its head, describing a time where affirmative action policies were arranged to favor white people. Katznelson argues that New Deal era policies were created to continue legal segregation without truly

Read More
155 Words | 1 Pages

Shelby Steele’s perspective about affirmative action is that it’s didn’t help African Americans achieve equality. Continuously, he believes that affirmative action only reinforces the misconception that people should be treated differently according to their outward appearance. Affirmative action is created to improve opportunities for minorities in employment and education. Like any legalization, affirmative action has positive and negative sides, however I disagree with Shelby Steele that negative effect on minorities. In our country, we have decades of racial, economical, and social inequality for minorities, and affirmative action tries to address that disparity.

Read More
870 Words | 4 Pages

I believe one of the most significant referendums in Australia that was carried, is the 1967 Referendum to include Aboriginal people within Section 51 and 127 of the Constitution. Prior to the 1st of January 1901, the Australian Constitution took effect and the Commonwealth of Australia was formed. Under the laws of the Australian Government, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples were not included as citizens. Instead they were treated as foreigners in their own land. On the 27th of May 1967, a Federal referendum was held to determine whether two references in the Australian Constitution, which discriminated against Aboriginal people, should be altered or entirely removed.

Read More
248 Words | 1 Pages

Affirmative Action
 Reader pg. 244 “ those many in our society that are darker, poorer, more identifiably foreign will continue to suffer the poverty, marginalization, immersion and incarceration.” Statistics are staggering Racial Disparities in Incarceration African Americans constitute nearly 1 million of the total 2.3 million incarcerated population, they are incarcerated at nearly six times the rate of whites, what’s shocking is that one in six black men had been incarcerated as of 2001 and if the trends continues one in three black males born today can expect to spend time in prison during his lifetime. I am for affirmative action, as I believe that when the late President John F Kennedy signed the affirmative action on March 6th 1961,

Read More
693 Words | 3 Pages

Discrimination increases awareness of the non-white

Read More
208 Words | 1 Pages

What’s astounding about the reverse racism argument is the way in which it reveals some racists’ deep need to deny the idea of having any privilege. Rather than acknowledging the realities of how people of color deal with racism, white racists do mental and hypothetical cartwheels in order to justify these injustices. There have been so many explainers on why the concept of reverse racism is inherently wrong, so many breakdowns, but perhaps another way to tackle this discussion is to address some of the main topics and issues that get called out as reverse racism. Here are four common arguments that have no merit: 1. Affirmative Action takes jobs and scholarships away from white people.

Read More
1523 Words | 7 Pages

Another thing that places students of color at a disadvantage in college admissions is the persisting cultural bias in high-stakes testing. “High-stakes” tests are those that are tied to major consequences, such as admission to college, or even high school graduation. Fair education reform advocates have long been citing an extensive record of standardized testing concerns, many of which relate to racial bias and discrimination. As researcher and author Harold Berlak explains in the journal Rethinking Education: Standardized testing perpetuates institutionalized racism and contributes to the achievement gap between whites and minorities. For instance, the deeply embedded stereotype that African Americans perform poorly on standardized tests

Read More
1935 Words | 8 Pages

Racial issues are sometimes dismissed as history; they are thought of as issues of the past. People sometimes believe that since the government preaches equality, that most racial issues are resolved. This is not the case in today’s society, as racial issues are still prevalent in everyday life. Not only facing discriminatory practices in the job market, minorities face racism in many different aspects of everyday life. In the world we live in today, people tend to judge a whole group of people based on the actions of only a few.

Read More
810 Words | 4 Pages

In the United States’ current political climate, “racism” is a term thrown around so often that it almost begins to lose its original definition. The same can be said when discussing and analyzing the success rate of minority students in higher education. People are inclined to jump to the conclusion that a faculty member or institution is inherently racist instead of looking at all of the factors involved in a student’s success. The three main factors that I will be covering over the course of this essay are school tuition rates, Affirmative Action policies, and how schools handle discipline. While there are cases of inarguable racism within higher education, an in-depth analysis of the factors stated above will prove that “racism” is not

Read More
747 Words | 3 Pages

The concept of discrimination then leads to the civil rights movement. Whites turned on the African Americans, after the use of slavery, they went full on offensive. Hate crimes started towards them and it was chaos (“Racial”). It seemed like this influence has spread and now people are attacking the minority group.

Read More
1209 Words | 5 Pages

Obama claims she could feel scrutiny from her peers and teachers, as if they were thinking, "I know why you're here." Moreover, affirmative action delegitimizes the hard work minority students put in throughout high school, and causes their peers to view them as unworthy counterparts. Whether or not affirmative action truly benefitted an accepted student doesn’t matter. Students and staff will likely treat minority students if they are simply a result of affirmative action -- which is demorilizing to minority students.

Read More
220 Words | 1 Pages

You did a good job on explaining about the affirmative action. Further, you provide the specific example on the affirmative minority groups is the women. I think this example have clearly defined the strength of the affirmative action. I agree with you that affirmative action is to the way to ensure the equivalent opportunity and access among people (Lecture 2). For the weakness of this action, I think you should add more information.

Read More
883 Words | 4 Pages

However, advocates are aware of the failures that exist in affirmative action; for instance, racial injustices and poverty (Gu, McFerran, Aquino, & Kim, 2014). The primary liability of affirmative action is not in its intent or original design. It lies in its economic and political process which has unemployment and inequity constructed on it. Unless these issues are dealt with, no solution will be attained to resolve racial inequities and economic and social injustice.

Read More
1028 Words | 5 Pages

Weak affirmative action which is just an effort to ensure that all qualified minority groups are considered whereas the strong one is when some sort of preference is given to the minority candidate. Later the author concludes that he will focus on the strong affirmative action because it is the most controversial one. Then the author gives us many arguments of different people and critics for and against affirmative action. Later on, David Boonin gives us his own arguments in favor of affirmative action which are 1) the unfair disadvantage argument; 2) the (other) compensation argument; 3) the appeal to diversity; 4) the need for role models; 5) the bias-elimination argument; 6) race as a qualification. “I conclude that while affirmative action may prove to have some desirable features and some beneficial consequences, there’s no reason to believe that it’s morally obligatory.

Read More
1734 Words | 7 Pages

Racial inequality has plagued our society for centuries and has been described as a “black eye” on American history. It wasn’t until the passing of The Civil Rights Act of 1965 that minorities were given equal protection under the law. This was a crucial step on our society’s road to reconciling this injustice. However, the effects of past racial inequality are still visible to this day, and our society still wrestles with how to solve this issue. In 1965, President Lyndon B Johnson said: “You do not take a person who, for years, has been hobbled by chains and liberate him, bring him up to the starting line of a race and then say you are free to compete with all the others, and still just believe that you have been completely fair.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Affirmative Action

Related Topics

Open Document