ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Genetic Cloning

1003 Words5 Pages

Modern technology has invaded our world by storm. Minute by minute, unique ideas pop in the mind of the people in this generation to build and create something new that will be helpful to us. These advancements had aid us in almost all of the tasks that we do every day. It may give us a lot of benefits but if they fell into the wrong hands, we may be facing a door leading to a place where harm and danger are the only things that exist. From the issues that we are having today, one of the most controversial is the proposition of having genetic cloning. According to Webster’s dictionary (2015), genetic cloning is the process in which a gene of interest is located and copied (cloned) out of DNA extracted from an organism. It means that it does not follow the natural reproduction process since you only need a sample of DNA from an organism which can be coming from different parts of the body such as hair, saliva and dead skin cells. The main goal of genetic …show more content…

Since,I think it is immoral to produce a clone especially with the kind of people who are living in this kind of society. If genetic cloning will be approved, I think that it will cause a great chaos to thenation. First of all, it will cause overpopulation. We know that our world cannot withstand more people because we are lacking the natural resources that will sustain the physiological needs of every individual. As said in the disadvantages, there can be identity crisis since we will not be able to know which is which and who the original one among all is. With these identity crisis, it will lead to destruction of families and other relationship conflicts such as a mother to her children, a friend to a friend and the like. I believe that the world can be a better place if we will stick on the natural process. Although, we know that it can provide us a lot of benefits, think about the negative effects that it can bring

Show More
Related
2906 Words | 12 Pages

There are many arguments in support of human cloning. Some are fairly easy to accept, such as elimination of genetic disease”(Human Cloning). With the technology of cloning, the percentages of disease could reduce. That also includes genetic issues could be solved as well. Cloning has been said to give therapeutic support when making new cures.

Read More
1048 Words | 5 Pages

While, cloning is taking the same DNA and replicating it to make an identical copy of that same DNA. Although many people may think genetic enhancement and cloning is a dangerous idea and corrodes the prevailing moral order because it goes against religious beliefs, the advancements may go too far, and there are risk factors. Genetic enhancement and cloning is a good impact on society because it helps food supply, cures inherited diseases, solves infertility, and there is a potential to live longer. Imagine a world without diseases, infertility, and bad genes, that is what genetic enhancement

Read More
1325 Words | 6 Pages

Many believe cloning is a perversion of science, and some are even concerned with a real life Frankenstein situation: “Reproductive cloning… could lead to a Dr. Frankenstein’s vision of lab manufactured humans. To me this is a perversion of science” (Ford 1). Furthermore, in Frankenstein, Dr. Frankenstein detached from the world as he became obsessed with his studies, diminishing his health. A similar thing could happen to scientists who clone if they decide that they are “playing god,” which can be dangerous for the scientists and the clones. Cloning is so controversial and causes an overbearing amount of stress for it to be befitting to the human mind, as Victor Frankenstein puts it, “If the study to which you apply yourself has a tendency to weaken your affections, and to destroy… those simple pleasures in which no alloy can possibly mix, then that study is certainly unlawful… not befitting of the human minds” (Shelley 50).

Read More
1669 Words | 7 Pages

Take this into consideration and acknowledge how it could impact humanity, as well as the cloned human. The advancing technology allows individuals to have the freedom of bringing their prescience about cloning humans into a reality, faster than one could imagine. One mistake could entirely deteriorate humankind more than benefit it. In today’s quickly-advancing technological age, human cloning is possible; however, it is unethical because it diminishes individuality, interferes with nature, and increases the risk of fatal failures.

Read More
1567 Words | 7 Pages

Whether that be the researchers in charge of the cloning project, the companies opening it up to the public, or the public that wants to partake of the cloning opportunity, all of these would not have something that they had before if cloning was outlawed in the United States. Many researchers are in support of cloning because they feel that cloning opens up many doors and possibilities in the research world. This stems from a common issue faced in research... not having a control that is alike enough to be accurate. A solution to this issue per researchers is to have the controls (lab rats) all be cloned. With the ability to clone, all the rats would be genetically identical and therefore the control would be more reliable.

Read More
389 Words | 2 Pages

I believe human cloning interferes with nature in ways humanity will not be able to handle. This source states, " This could lead to a set of problems that we have no ability to handle. " The evidence suggests that human cloning can lead to the fall of humanity, due to clones becoming soverienty. However, some people believe that human cloning can be useful, due to assisting with unlawful interests. I beleive that this will only create misuse of knowledge in trying to correct clones in right paths.

Read More
1019 Words | 5 Pages

From a scientific standpoint, reproductive cloning would rob the clones of their individuality, as they are exactly like someone in the past that people would expect them to live up to, as Gerald Ford stated, “From there it is a short step toward a soulless state wherein assembly line man is robbed of his individuality by science run amok”(Ford). Also, the clones do not have a say in whether they want that or not, which would make them feel like they were quite literally robbed of their individuality, as they are humans, too, who would have existed as a completely different person had it not been for cloning. On another note, If human clones do not turn out perfect, their “creators” may abandon them, and that could affect the clones in a negative way and make them want revenge on their creators for doing that to them, similar to how the creature felt in Frankenstein. In the quote “He had abandoned me: and, in the bitterness of my heart, I cursed him” (Shelley), Victor Frankenstein ran from his own creation, something similar could happen if after the cloning the parent realizes that they are “playing god,” or that what they are doing is “immoral,” leading to abandonment. Moreover, human clones would have no choice but to live with being clones, and possibly the pain of some kind of mutation caused by their cloning.

Read More
1248 Words | 5 Pages

Ever since that first breakthrough, cloning has been used for research in agricultural trade (“Cloning”). Cloning has also been tested on plants rather successfully (“Cloning”). However, there are many who feel that the cloning of humans is immoral: “Designing our descendants through the technological tyranny of eugenics, thus making possible a kind of evil that

Read More
994 Words | 4 Pages

The insight gathered through this cloning experiment and the technique can be used to breed macaques for biomedical research, according to the team of researchers. This is because genetically identical copies of the same animals reduce variation in the results of testing new medications. “For the cloning of primate species, including humans, the technical barrier is now broken” (Greshko), the co-author Mu-Ming Poo stated. Poo is the director of the Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology at the Chinese Academy of Sciences. “However, the reason we chose to break this barrier is to produce animal models that are useful for human medicine.

Read More
1614 Words | 7 Pages

Most people in our society, no matter what level of education that they may have, have heard of the cloning, specifically the cloning of Dolly the lamb, and have some notions regarding the idea of cloning humans. "The successes in animal cloning suggest to some that the technology has matured sufficiently to justify its application to human cloning" (Jaenisch et al.). However, not every agrees that human cloning is a something that should be put into practice (Hoskins). There generally seem to be two basic divisions on this issue: those who find it inappropriate and unethical, and those who find it a reasonable and necessary step in the progression of scientific research (Lustig).

Read More
862 Words | 4 Pages

Do you know that based on the scientific studies, 90% human cloning tuned out to be unsuccessful. Human cloning(modifying babies) is a process of producing new identical babies by altering their genomes. Some of studies show that scientists successfully cloned animals such as cows, Pigs, and sheep. For the past 3-5 years human cloning have a lot of debates and controversies between peoples. However Human cloning is dangerous for the new engineered baby and their moms, so it should be banned to prevent new disease, to constantly limit the population of dying human beings, and to stop unnecessary fees to modify babies.

Read More
988 Words | 4 Pages

Many scientists are trying to clone humans but is it ever justified? There are a whole lot of debates on this topic, and I am strongly against it. Human cloning is ethically wrong; there are many risks involved, which will lead to detrimental effects on human society. Before going into my points, I would like to talk about what cloning is. According to the National Human Genome Research Institute, cloning is “a number of different processes that can be used to produce genetically identical copies of a biological entity.”

Read More
1066 Words | 5 Pages

Furthermore, human cloning enables the duplication of individuals of great traits. Parents able to screen their future baby for modify or select the baby genetic makeup. They can choose the traits such as intelligence, height, hair colour, skin colour and else. Through human cloning, parents can have their desire baby with selecting the good

Read More
1547 Words | 7 Pages

The term ‘Human Cloning’ refers to an asexual type of reproduction. Meaning that an embryo is produced not during a male and female natural sexual production, but rather, it is produced in a laboratory, when scientists combine a sperm and an egg together. Cloning works somehow like the natural

Read More
1531 Words | 7 Pages

Human cloning tends to take place in unreliable laboratories, with scientists who have limited knowledge on what to do if a step they take is incorrect because they are usually just experimenting in unknown territory. (is this true?? Lots of laws regarding cloning especially in the UK) This leads to major ethical difficulties as scientists are playing with human life. Furthermore, if a clone is made and there is even the slightest mishap, whereby the clone could be inclined to suffer if given the chance to grow, some would strongly oppose due to the fact that human life is so complex and needs a perfect designer, not a person in a laboratory wearing a white coat and plastic goggles.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Genetic Cloning

Related Topics

Open Document