GPS tracking of a suspect refers to the use of Global Positioning System technology to monitor the location of an individual who is the subject of a criminal investigation. In the United States, the use of GPS tracking on a suspect generally requires a search warrant due to the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. The Supreme Court has ruled that using a GPS tracker constitutes a "search" and therefore requires a warrant.
A warrant needs to be present to use GPS tracking. Individuals have their rights stated in the U.S. Constitution and should be respected and followed by law enforcement. The warrant requirement serves as a safeguard to guarantee that
…show more content…
These cases have established that the use of GPS tracking on a suspect generally requires a warrant based on probable cause.
One of the key cases is United States v. Jones (2012), which dealt with the issue of warrantless searches including the use of GPS technology to monitor the activities of a suspect. The GPS tracking device was placed on a suspect's vehicle by law enforcement without a warrant. The Court ruled that the use of the GPS device was a search and that it was unconstitutional because it was done without a warrant. The Court also held that the government must obtain a warrant before using GPS technology to monitor a suspect's movements.
As technology continues to advance, the use of GPS tracking as a tool for law enforcement will likely become increasingly prevalent. One potential implication is that law enforcement may turn to alternative forms of surveillance that do not require a warrant, such as facial recognition technology or cell-site location information. This could cause a shift in the way law enforcement gathers information, resulting in a decrease in protected privacy for individuals. The future implications of requiring a search warrant for GPS tracking of a suspect are complex and