Attackers unleashed a coordinated wave of explosions, gunfire and hostage-taking in Paris Friday night that left more than 132 people dead, more than 350 injured and generated scenes of horror. The only thing people think that will stop terrorist attacks is escalating a war with ISIS. The United States should not escalate the war with ISIS because it will cause more problems, anger will be brought down upon us, and the plan might not even work. Escalating the war will cause more problems between the U.S. and ISIS. The Islamic States threat is only growing. With that being said the more the threat keeps growing the smaller chance we have of winning. Imagine trying to invade the Islamic states, causing more danger than there already is. If we strike back at ISIS, to them there will be more of a reason to keep on threatening the U.S. Increasing the war with ISIS will have more anger brought down upon us. “The use of force has gotten us into the fix in which we now find ourselves” says John B. Quigley. Quigley knows that we got into this mess and somehow we will have to get out of it before an outrage happens unexpectedly. The Islamic State fighters want us to get angry. Once we have reached our boiling point we are going …show more content…
If president Obama wants to defeat the Islamic State group he will have to become a war leader. Putting troops on the ground is the surest way to win this war. The problem is the absence of U.S. boots on the ground changed the facts on the ground, and the Islamic State will be quick to take advantage. As they take advantage they are more than likely to win the war. Barack Obama will not be able to a military effort. Using a military effort to defeat Islamic State is not likely to work. President Barack Obama understands that if he were to proclaim a goal of definitively eliminating ISIS in the short term, he would fail. Then he would have to eat his words (Quigley,