ipl-logo

Pursuit Of Safety Essay

773 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Reason for american revolution

"The US was a nation born out of uncertainty, no one knew if the revolution would succeed, if George Washington would survive or if the loyalists would be removed from their positions, but people still went charging into the unknown. They did not know what the opinion of their fellow soldiers or even their neighbors, but that did not stop them in their pursuit of liberty. There are concerns today of what the US government should do to in order to insure security and prevent domestic attacks. This has evolved into; security in more locations such as airports and banks, conflicts abroad, done to destroy threats on the outside from ever entering the US. But this pursuit of safety for the American people has also led to increased monitoring of Americans. With digital technology becoming a large part of our lives, more of our private information can be easily obtained and tracked by hackers. This has encouraged the US government to pursue this open information to discover and stop potential crimes before they even start. However, this is a massive drift away from what the US government was built on. The Us government has no lawful claim to monitor internet content of any kind as any monitoring interferes with constitutional ideas and is what incentivised the revolution over 200 years ago. The US was founded under oppressive circumstances. Since the founding of the colonies, they were …show more content…

When considering what we allow our government to do, we must consider what the British government did over 200 years ago and attempted to fix. When seeing the oppression faced then, we can see that allowing any part of the US government to monitor the internet will lead to the same oppression that we faced previously that our founding fathers tried to prevent. Therefore, the government of the US at any level has no authority from the constitution to monitor the

Show More
Related
427 Words | 2 Pages

Recently the right to privacy has been severely threatened by the Patriot Act. The USA PATRIOT ACT, which was made a law on October 26, 2001 by president George W. Bush, let criminal investigators use whatever tools necessary to find terrorist attacks before they happened; USA PATRIOT ACT is short for "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001". This was made a law in response to the attacks on the Pentagon and World Trade Center in NYC on September 11, 2001. Law enforcement officials were given better resources to fight financial counterfeiting, smuggling and money laundering schemes that funded terrorists. The Patriot Act’s definition of terrorism also gave

Read More
377 Words | 2 Pages

The American Constitution gives U.S. citizens basic civil liberties that provide protection from the federal government through the Bill of Rights and the Amendments added throughout American history. However, the national government has repeatedly taken away these significant liberties during a war, and in this era the government’s war on terrorism stirs up controversy all over the globe after the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. Supporters of the government’s detainment of non-citizens and the NSA’s surveillance of data Internet Service Providers--for example, claim that being secure and safe takes priority over established values. In the anthology Rereading America, Gary Colombo’s The Myth of Freedom;

Read More
1418 Words | 6 Pages

Edward Snowden sparked huge sensational news stories and debates over the groundbreaking revelation of the massive surveillance program that was authorized by Congress and the president of the United States of America. It was formally presented as the USA PATRIOT Act by Congress and signed into law by George W. Bush on October 26, 2001. The PATRIOT Act was approved by a large bipartisan majority in the Senate and the House of Representatives. The PATRIOT Act soon went under the radar as the US went into war in Afghanistan and Iraq. However, Edward Snowden forced up the issue of civil liberties and national security once again when he released documents specifically pertaining to the National Security Agency out to The Guardian.

Read More
1590 Words | 7 Pages

The United States spends more on its defense than any other country in the world, in a democratic state whose constitution Alexander Hamilton helped to inspire. It’s questionable as to what lengths a democratic system should go to keep its citizens safe as ultimately security cannot be unconditionally guaranteed. Having a debate between liberty and security is by no means a new one, its influence on political thought can be profoundly polarizing, as the extremes of both liberty and security can be witnessed around the world and throughout history. The principles that must be prioritized within a democracy while still affording safety, revolves around the ability of citizens to exercise their political liberties.

Read More
1277 Words | 6 Pages

The U.S follows a different school of surveillance. Despite the fundamental right to be held “innocent until proven guilty”, it monitors everyone until proven innocent. The status quo could of course damage America’s long known liberties granted by the Constitution. Recent revelations by whistleblower Edward Snowden, have confirmed that the government is more likely to cross some constitutional lines in the name of national security. “The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (FISA) regulates the government’s acquisition of any electronic surveillance within the country for foreign intelligence use.

Read More
842 Words | 4 Pages

Imagine for a second that every phone call you make, every text message you send, and every place you go is being constantly monitored by multiple governments. Well this is basically what the United State and United Kingdom's government is doing on a daily basis. The United States National Security Agency has been implementing projects in secret to monitoring people since 2001 but it would still be kept as a secret if Edward Snowden did not reveal this massive secret that was intruding the public’s privacy for years. The U.S. surveillance program started because of the September 9th, 2001 terrorist attack that hijacked airplanes and slammed them into the World Trade Center towers.

Read More
839 Words | 4 Pages

There’s a question americans usually ask themselves, is the government trustable? Many citizens would answer no, many americans believe that the government is constantly watching them. The privacy of americans citizens is being violated by the gps trackers in our phones that the government can see and monitor, how the governments listens to our calls and how they store all our information. This is similar to the privacy violations explored in 1984 by showing how in 1984 Big Brother is constantly watching it’s citizens.

Read More
413 Words | 2 Pages

In 2001 only a little over a month after 911 The Patriot Act was passed. On the surface the act seems to be concerned with the safety of the American people; however it was reactionary, a result of the culture of fear created by America’s first experience with terrorism, a word that still holds a powerful

Read More
694 Words | 3 Pages

Whether these actions are considered constitutional though, are much a matter of opinion. According to the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution, one is entitled to the right of not enduring an unreasonable search and seizure without a warrant. Some may say that the monitoring of internet activity violates this amendment due to the fact that there is no warrant needed, and we aren't exactly sure of when the monitoring is occuring. But of course, this is up to interpretation. It is also hard to say that can something is unconstitutional when it has been going on for a significant period of time, and the actions have been approved by congress.

Read More
1189 Words | 5 Pages

In 2008, President Bush signed into law The FISA Amendment Act, an act which allowed the government to monitor Americans’ electronic devices. Bush claimed that this Act could help save lives, as mentioned before, but what he did not mention is that this allows the government to conduct surveillance without probable cause. (“How the NSA’s Surveillance Procedures Threaten Americans’ Privacy.”) When people heard about this, they became concerned, and many began to question if the NSA would abuse this power.

Read More
1271 Words | 6 Pages

Ever since Harry Truman, the government has been keeping internet and phone records. But now, it’s gone too far. On October 26, 2001, President George W Bush signed the USA Patriot Act. When it went through Congress, the House of Representatives passed the act with a vote of

Read More
1652 Words | 7 Pages

The government has many tools in looking into people's information but the government doesn't realize that it is violating the 4th amendment by using the resources they have in looking into suspected people and that's the reason why we cannot trust our information to be safe with the government either way. David Cole, a lawyer who teaches constitutional law and national security at Georgetown University, and other legal analysts says that, “The world of computers has weakened the Fourth Amendment. " In the modern digital age, it means very, very little. "(citation). The reason why he says this is because, before we had computers, no one knew who we were seeing or where we were going throughout the day, but if someone were to know they would have to wiretap our things to know.

Read More
667 Words | 3 Pages

After the gruesome attacks of 9/11, the United States government passed a legislation called the Patriot Act in attempt to cut down on the terror attacks. This act gives the NSA, or National Security Agency, the ability to oversee our actions. The NSA’s approach to surveilling the population is obtaining the information by tapping into technology, such as phone calls, internet pages and searches, and viewing emails and texts. Thus, controversy has triggered due to the fact that these actions are unconstitutional, and much terrorism that remains. The NSA should be greatly altered because they invade the privacy of Americans, unlawfully goes against the constitution, and we lose our rights.

Read More
575 Words | 3 Pages

The United States needs to start seriously monitoring emails, text messages, phone calls, and web searches for any suspicious activity that could lead to terrorism. This is no joke, extremism in the defense of being able to go to a baseball game, or concert without anxiety is no vice. If anyone is a suspected terrorist, they should be monitored. Some people say that the Patriot Act is unconstitutional, but is it worth risking a life? Monitoring a suspected terrorist could prevent an attack from happening, and save lives.

Read More
821 Words | 4 Pages

To be free is defined as the condition or right of being able or allowed to do whatever you want to, without being controlled or limited. In today’s society freedom can allow you to a variety of things. To be safe is defined as the condition of being protected from or unlikely to cause danger or risk. In my opinion safety is more important than freedom. Freedom is something that can be offered anywhere.

Read More

More about Pursuit Of Safety Essay

Open Document