"The US was a nation born out of uncertainty, no one knew if the revolution would succeed, if George Washington would survive or if the loyalists would be removed from their positions, but people still went charging into the unknown. They did not know what the opinion of their fellow soldiers or even their neighbors, but that did not stop them in their pursuit of liberty. There are concerns today of what the US government should do to in order to insure security and prevent domestic attacks. This has evolved into; security in more locations such as airports and banks, conflicts abroad, done to destroy threats on the outside from ever entering the US. But this pursuit of safety for the American people has also led to increased monitoring of Americans. With digital technology becoming a large part of our lives, more of our private information can be easily obtained and tracked by hackers. This has encouraged the US government to pursue this open information to discover and stop potential crimes before they even start. However, this is a massive drift away from what the US government was built on. The Us government has no lawful claim to monitor internet content of any kind as any monitoring interferes with constitutional ideas and is what incentivised the revolution over 200 years ago. The US was founded under oppressive circumstances. Since the founding of the colonies, they were …show more content…
When considering what we allow our government to do, we must consider what the British government did over 200 years ago and attempted to fix. When seeing the oppression faced then, we can see that allowing any part of the US government to monitor the internet will lead to the same oppression that we faced previously that our founding fathers tried to prevent. Therefore, the government of the US at any level has no authority from the constitution to monitor the