ipl-logo

Persuasive Essay On Support Bases

1301 Words6 Pages

The president is one of the highest and most esteemed office in the United States. The last two elections was noticeable for many reasons. Obama and Trump are polar opposites in many facets however what made them truly remarkable is the differences in their support base. Support bases can be defined as those who give aid or approval to subscribe to support a political candidature. It is beneficial to compare Obama and Trump when discussing support base because their campaigns highlighted how support base can and will affect voters and the elections. Support bases within voting can be broken down into four main categories: Political alliance, age, demographics, and educational level. It is entirely possible for those who come from the four categories of support bases to have supported both Trump and Obama. Partisanship within politics means to be a strong supporter of a party or a cause. Many people have partisanship which results in party alliance. Once party alliance occurs elections can be pretty much predicted. It is important to know that Trump is a republican conservative while Obama is a democrat liberal so they tended to have receive most of the votes within their party or party philosophy. As evidence, Trump held 81% of the conservative vote, 41% of the moderates, and 19% of the liberal vote. Obama held 86% of the liberal vote, 56% of the moderates, and 17% of the conservative votes. Most people tend to vote within their party with little to no outside voting. The reason mostly conservatives voted for Trump is because he represented their values and goals. The same philosophy is used by …show more content…

Changes in societal experiences may, therefore, alter citizens’ political orientations. The result is that different generations have distinct political leanings that they will tend to maintain over their lifetimes.” (Fisher

Show More
Related
813 Words | 4 Pages

The differentiators that account for the variation are the parties and Congress. Meinke then deduces from the information that the majority party in Congress exhibits a significant substantial number of members that advertise their partisan activity — “…majority party status—and possibly the strength of the party brand name—is associated with the choice.” (Meinke 860) Meinke also discovers that the stronger the partisan base (measured by same-party presidential vote), there is a more

Read More
1641 Words | 7 Pages

In general, those who identified as Republican or Democrat or had leanings to one side or the other in the 2016 election voted for that party’s presidential candidate regardless of whether or not they actually liked that candidate in particular with very few exceptions. Some viewed this kind of extreme partisanship as new and as something that made the 2016 election even more unusual than the media was already claiming it to be. However, the election of 1800 also showed an extreme amount of partisanship, indeed probably the first of its like. In that election, every state that was solidly Federalist or solidly Democratic-Republican voted accordingly, with the few swing states deciding the election, though their votes were really decided sometimes months before the election due to the nature of the electoral system at the time; the congressional elections of the “swing states” during the election year were what really decided the states’ electoral votes since the methods of choosing electors for the electoral college from each state was controlled by each state’s congress. Similarly in the 2016 election, all of the solidly Republican states and all of the solidly Democratic states voted accordingly with only a few swing states deciding the election.

Read More
1226 Words | 5 Pages

Trump won 306 electoral votes and 46.1 % of the popular vote (62,979,879 votes) over his running mate Hillary Clinton, according to CNN. In the 1800 both Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr were tied at 73 electoral votes, recorded from 270towin, but Thomas Jefferson ended up being declared the presidential winner. In order to accurately compare the elections of 1800 and 2016, it is necessary to compare the candidates of both elections. Frequently people draw similarities to Trump and Aaron Burr, as both are portrayed with the same characterization.

Read More
778 Words | 4 Pages

The system of political parties serves to accurately sort Americans into categories based on political views, but this often serves to wage animosity between groups, especially when one group holds more political power than the

Read More
1142 Words | 5 Pages

The use of political ideologies allows him to demonstrate how the brain organization does not depend on upcoming experiences but past experiences (Hiadt 44). Liberals tend to be more open minded as for conservatives are more close minded. Haidt and Lakoff believe political ideologies demonstrate how individuals are divided into groups which leads to express and shape ideas differently, which help influence and drive the voters to present their support to either the liberals or the conservative candidate. Haidt and Konnikova give a great understanding of how the candidates strategies influence the publics support but Lakoff creates a stronger and clear argument of how the candidates vote for who their identity fit or in other

Read More
1696 Words | 7 Pages

From the 2004 election to the 2008 election, America was more divided than ever. One would think that the trend would continue, but whatever Trump and Clinton preached must have changed something in America. As a nation, the 2016 election was a close one. However, locally the election was more divided than ever. In 2008, the percentage of voters that lived in counties where either candidate won by 20 or more points was 47.6%.

Read More
304 Words | 2 Pages

Religious affiliation could also be a factor, with Catholic and Jewish voters tend to favor Democrats, while Mormons and white Protestants favor the Republican

Read More
1644 Words | 7 Pages

Political views are important in society and important for voting. Throughout life, political views are something learned and or taught by surrounding environments, people, etc. Opposing views have separated relationships and friendships simply because of the difference. Though political views vary a lot of the time, people of the lower class and or lower middle class tend to vote left-leaning or democratic while the upper class and or the rich more than likely tend to vote red or republican. A lot of the time it is said that the Democrats vote that way because that party supports the “working man” while the Republicans simply support the rich.

Read More
762 Words | 4 Pages

As a result, the electorate may have been influence by voters, who were most likely moderate, favoring more liberal policies compared to conservative policies approved by Bush. Therefore, this could have potentially lead to Obama’s

Read More
572 Words | 3 Pages

This occurrence is based on the phenomenon that primary voters are more ideologically extreme, and therefore favor more extreme

Read More
334 Words | 2 Pages

Out of the 241 million Americans eligible to vote in the 2012 election, a mere 67% actually participated (Rose). By providing political labels, they create unity in values and makes politicians accountable for their legislations. Assuming that Republicans remain a conservative party and the Democrats remain a liberal party, Americans are more likely to support an individual party. Individualists have the opportunity to run as president, but have difficulty doing so because it is difficult to gain support. Political parties are not prescribed by the Constitution but are critical to success of America.

Read More
962 Words | 4 Pages

Voter income has become increasingly affiliated to ideological and party ID, with higher-income voters tending to be linked with Republicans, and lower-income voters leaning Democrat. The divide is significant enough that political scientists, namely Nolan McCarty in his book, Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches, have denoted popular theories for polarization (such as Southern realignment and religion) in favour of income as the primary reason. McCarty argues that the tendency for high-income Americans to side with the Republican Party reduces incentives for politicians to look for a middle ground when considering economic issues; therefore, less centrists are in government, and polarization between the two parties occur, with politicians growing farther apart on the ideological scale in order to satisfy the voting needs of the voters they have already captured (high-income for Republicans, and middle/low-income for Democrats). (McCarty et al.,

Read More
1772 Words | 8 Pages

During the 1860s, competition favored the Republicans with a level reaching over 20. However, in 2010, competition significantly diminished, reaching around two (Hopkins and Sides 2015, 77). Overall, Democrats and Republican elites influence the amounts of polarization in America, driven by their differing political ideologies and a hunger for greater political

Read More
562 Words | 3 Pages

I have been, therefore, surrounded by Republicans since I was a child. I have, off the top of my head, only two or three friends that are firmly liberal. In addition, most of my teachers in middle and high school have been Republican, giving their lessons a subtle, possibly unconscious bias. 5. Social Class

Read More
428 Words | 2 Pages

The subject of abortion rights has been highly debated in the United States for a long a time. To comprehend the various elements of the abortion debate, we must first dwell into the arguments presented by both proponents and opponents Proponents for abortion cite that the personal liberties of women are endangered when others begin to place restrictions on what they can do to their bodies. Proponents see nothing morally wrong with abortions done in a reasonable time-frame, with most proponents claiming “A fertilized egg, an embryo…represents potential human life,” but is not in itself a living being yet (News).Meanwhile, opponents to abortion hold a separate concept of when life begins and regards the abortion of even “potential” life as murder. Emphasizing facts like “1.1 million U.S. aborts [occur] a year,” and that “51% of abortions are performed on women less than 25 years of age,” opponents hold that abortion is just a means of encouraging irresponsibility (student).

Read More

More about Persuasive Essay On Support Bases

Related Topics

Open Document