ipl-logo

Pete Anderson Case Summary

340 Words2 Pages
If I had been on the jury of this case against Pete Anderson I would have handed the jury the verdict that Pete Anderson was in fact guilty. I think that Pete Anderson illegally took archeological artifacts from public land. I think the fact that the location of the cronquistii coincides with the location of the looted Anasazi site, is an indication that Pete Anderson did in fact take the plants from this land area. The three types of daisy’s in the area were confertifolia, tortifolia, cronquistii. Regarding the morphology of these daisies, they each were able to be identified by the size of the “compositase” protein. However, after investigation through gel electrophoresis, the three kinds of plants were not identical. This relates to the

More about Pete Anderson Case Summary

Open Document