Lincoln Ealefoh, Mrs White, English, 5/30/2018. The conflicts in the taming of the shrew Dear Journal, There has been a lot of disagreements going on among me and others for different reasons, also something new about me is that I have finally gotten married to petruchio though I am still not interested in him, to make it worse he lives in a dusty old big house with many servants he matreats. Immediately after my marriage I supposed my sister we be getting married and they would expect me to come with Petruchio and see how we are coping and with no surprises we won’t not in this kind of house, I know nothing good is going to make out of this. (Man vs man)
Petruchio uses sexual puns in an effort to undermine Katherine 's anger and resistence. Many other characters in the play refer to Katherine as some sort of dangerous wild animal, and in this conversation, Petruchio refers to her as a wasp. In anger, She replies that if she is a wasp, then Petruchio should be wary of her sting. In a confident manner, Petruchio replies that he will just simple pluck her stinger out making it impossible to hurt him. When Petruchio says this, he is basically challenging Katherine.
Katherine the main character, is labeled as a shrew by the whole town for the fact that she would rather speak her mind then be put down by others. Grade A comedy. If the roles were to be reversed and Katherine was the one to tame Petruchio this would no longer be a comedy of this era but a controversial portrayal of women being superior to men in a way. * Gasps*
Petruchio later on says that he is the master of Kate and has full control over her. This meaning her clothing, what she eats, her actions, everything. This is just one example of how Petruchio is very immature and impolite acting as if Kate is a slave to
This is why I do not agree for Petruchio to remain standing. Kate does not deserve to live because of her ill-mannered being. Firstly, her mistreatment towards others is the reason why people loathe her. She retaliates by striking men who perceive her as a vicious woman. Although we both have shared the life without our mother, there is no reason for her to become so heartless.
Through his incentive, he is very determined to marry Kate even though she comes with money, marriage, and a malicious attitude. In addition, Petruchio does not care if his wife is a shrew or foul, he just asks "...if thou know one rich enough to be Petruchio's wife" (1.2.68). Not to mention, after Hortensio tells him of Kate, Petruchio only says to "...tell [him] her father's name, and tis enough" (1.2.95). Petruchio understands that Kate has a "...scolding tongue" (1.2.101) even though Hortensio warms him. Due to his incentive to cure Kate of her shrew-ish ways and to get Baptista's money.
She was described as a “shrew”, bring us back to the title “Taming of the Shrew”. Petruchio knew that Katherine was tamed when she finally complied with him. On the road to Padua, Petruchio "breaks" Kate. He pretends that the sun is the moon and demands that Kate go along with what he says. Then, when they encounter an old man, Petruchio pretends that the old man is young girl, which Kate also goes along
The movie “10 Things I Hate About You” and William Shakespeare’s play “The Taming of the Shrew” are considered to be that of a romantic comedy genre, dealing with relationships, and most importantly ,both conclude with a happy ending. Leaving both the audience and the characters feeling satisfied and cheerful. So how is this movie the same with the play and yet so different? The plot for the blockbuster 1999 movie is based on the “The Taming of the Shrew”.
He pushes the Priest and drinks the communion wine, afterwards he brings her to his home where his servants try and feed her but he insists that its no good for her, neither the dress she wore and she doesn 't need rest. He’s using the tactic of over loving to beat her into the ground, to wear her to the bone and in a sense it’s getting Kate to respect him and come to terms she is not longer the alpha in the equation. Some may argue that in fact she’s just pretending do please him and shes secretly rebelling in her inner sense, but a person that can barely keep their eyes open has no fight left in them, she wanted to marry Petruchio (cite 2) “... She says she will see Petruchio hanged before she will marry him, but these remarks constitute the extent of her argument. She has the opportunity to say more, but she does not because in fact she wants to be married for she has met her match” Consequently, Kate doesn’t hate or despise Petruchio anymore, she may still have trouble coming to terms with her treatment, its new to her to be put in her place.
Change is good. Many hear this statement being thrown around in speeches and slogans by people trying to promote that change is for the better. Arthur Miller’s, The Crucible, the reader is able to infer and analyze the situations that the characters undergo making them feel uncomfortable and their need for change. The definition of crucible is “a heat resistant container in which materials inside can be subjected to great heat.” (Merriam- Webster, 190) Knowing this allows the reader to understand that the outside being the witnesses, put pressure on the adults, who are on the inside, subjecting them to change.
That is why the characters in the novel are different than in the film. First of all, Petruchio is in the novel more focused on the money than his comparative character Patrick Verona is in the film. That makes his character much different, because that is one of the most important characteristic properties he has in the novel. In the novel he only focuses
ACT 1 Petruchio: “Sir, sir, the first’s for me; let her go by” Gremio: “Yea, leave that labour to the great Hercules, And let it be more than Alcides’ twelve.” (i.ii.262-264) Gremio’s allusion to Hercules was one of the greatest foreshadowing of the fate of Petruchio and Katherine in the whole play. Known to have many great labors in his life, Hercules was referred to as a master of the monsters; and perhaps only someone comparable to the notorious legend could be capable enough to tame the shrew.
Some people are confused as to why Shakespear included the induction into his play. As the induction did not have anything to do with the story of Petruchio ( played by Richard Barton), and Kate ( played by Liz Taylor). According to Steven Orgel, “ Franco Zeffirelli solved the problem to ignore the induction altogether, and focus instead on the story of Petruchio and Kate.”
Kate is sworn off by her community while Petruchio gets to share a laugh with the other men, despite having arguably acted worse than her. Shakespeare intended for the viewers of the play to leave feeling guilty about the harshness Kate met; an inequality that is only apparent when done so excessively, especially considering the patriarchal forces in society at that time. Unlike Katherine, many women of that time would not have been given the opportunity to speak and act so boldly without severe punishment. Because of this, Shakespeare used her character as a medium through which to make society question its practices behind the thin veil of
Petruchio’s servants Grumio and Curtis were very small characters, but were symbols of the wealthy and how the wealthy acted. If you were wealthy during this time period, you had a servant, being wealthy did not necessarily mean that you had to abuse your servants, or treat them terribly, it depended on how they wanted people to see them. Petruchio wanted to present himself as wealthy, confident, and proud, however, he did not want people to know that he was self-centered, and that he was a gold-digger. “Let’s each one send unto his wife, And he whose wife is most obedient To come at first when he doth send for her Shall win the wager which we will propose” (Act 5, Scene 2). Petruchio only wanted money, he got paid to marry Katherine, and knew he would be able to tame her, therefore he bet money with the other men at the end to see who's wife was most tamed.
