ipl-logo

Essay Analysis Of Walter J. Ong, And Arendt's Work

970 Words4 Pages

Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, Walter J. Ong, and Hannah Arendt’s are progressive, forward radical thinkers and scholars of their time, as well as ours. These scholars explore, interpret and give insight to what they find to be relevant, not only did their explanation and point of views alter, shape and inspire thoughts and viewpoints in their time but they continue to do this presently. And, their views and perspectives are just as relevant for/to study then and now, especially Hannah Arendt’s work. Their views, though, different are also relatable and along like paths, and in this short essay you will find an analysis on the writings of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, Walter J. Ong, and Hannah Arendt’s and how they conceptualize and are applied to the spiritual modes of connectivity and the future of learning. …show more content…

Teilhard discusses The Future of Man with his Formation of the Noosphere explaining how we as humans evolved and our “growth, outside and above the biosphere, of an added planetary layer, an envelope of thinking substance, to which, for sake of convenience and symmetry, I have the name of the Noosphere.” Ong develops his argument of resituating the emerging, evolving and progression of religious human beings stating “humanistic scholarship have shifted, and the relationship of religion to human society has changed.” And, last but certainly not least is Arendt’s findings and revelations on human humanity, by postulating that “that the world is not humane just because it is made of human beings” and developing an argument and the notion that there is a creation of human connectivity in be

Show More
Related
780 Words | 4 Pages

The novel “Ishmael An Adventure of the Mind and Spirit” by Daniel Quinn explores the problems of society, culture, and the world. Humans are thriving in the world currently: we have developed language, mastered fire, and have dominion over agriculture. But while doing this humans have caused many massive problems, and are continuing to do so. Humans have great power over the world but do not fully understand the consequences. If we do not stop destroying the earth and environment, then humans will not survive.

Read More
1259 Words | 6 Pages

Russ Bush opens with these profound words that set the tone throughout the rest of the book. This is the essence of his thesis that God alone is in control of everything. Bush uses this to show that the real science is in what is observable, created by God. Bush confronts the culture of modernism and its persistent relative moral relativism head on by Publishing The Advancement: Keeping the Faith in An Evolutionary Age Bush conveys to the world the flaws that exist in the modern and

Read More
794 Words | 4 Pages

Since the dawn of humankind, historians are trying to piece out the gaps in history and explain how we got here based on the events of the past. Surprisingly, historian David Christian, author of This Fleeting World, summed up the astonishments and confusions of humanity in 113 pages. This short book, about world history, tells us about the prequel of the Universe (first 14 billion years of the earth without humans) to the modern era in history (how we are today). David’s goal is to provide an easy understanding of world history for students. What to expect in this enticing book?

Read More
274 Words | 2 Pages

Ara Norenzayan asserts that religion is not necessarily a basis for morality. Norenzayan is a psychology professor at the University of British Columbia, giving him the credentials to discuss humans’ moral compass and its origins. However, his judgements on religion are not completely justified as he is not a religion expert. This said, Norenzayan argues that “foraging societies that give… clues… of ancestral human conditions” show they do not have religions with a basis in morality. He also gives an account of a psychological study by Henrich that uses 15 pastoral and horticultural societies that showed “greater prosocial behavior” most prominently when experiencing “economic exchange with strangers” and not just a religion.

Read More
1051 Words | 5 Pages

The following discourse occurred among Walter Scheidel, Roger Gould and Randall Collins during a night of drinks at their favorite pub. Scheidel: Instances of great violence have pushed people towards equality. My hypothesis can be seen throughout history in which the four horsemen have acted as equalizers (6). Collins: What four horsemen are you referring to?

Read More
2134 Words | 9 Pages

The allusion of religion is shown through the ‘Sea of Faith’. Arnold uses the imagery of “ebb and flow” in the once “full, and round earth’s shore” sea of faith, and its “withdrawing roar” to show that lack of importance religion now has on society. Due to the technological advancements in industry, religion is no longer significant in the lives of

Read More
226 Words | 1 Pages

In “The Power of Realistic Thinking,” Sharon Astyk asserts that being an excessive optimistic or pessimistic thinker will not aid in determining the future. According to Astyk, the common future scenario of humans consists of a utopian vision that assumes through the usage of science and technology, barriers between humans and the serene future will diminish, producing a teleological and alluring world. On the other hand, Astyk discusses how a dystopian visualization of the future implicates with the destruction of humankind and catastrophic termination. Moreover, she advises that since we possibly might have produced the environmental problems or rendered them inferior, therefore, preventing us to control them, the human race is not unbound

Read More
785 Words | 4 Pages

Kush Garg Matthew Soucy H-English/AP-World History September 26, 2015 Ishmael: Change is Impossible After reading the book Ishmael, my mind has been expanding on the main topic of the book which is why we can’t change society because whenever we try to advance change just adds onto the destruction we are causing to our world. While I was reading this book, I began to learn more about how we are destroying our world even more. When humans lived in a simple manner, believing that they lived in the “hands of the gods,” evolution was destined to happen because humans had to adapt to their environment. This evolution sparked the problems that would come later in history, like deforestation, social inequality and pollution.

Read More
1055 Words | 5 Pages

Since the dawn of time, historians have been trying to piece out the gaps in history and explain how we got here based on the events of the past. Surprisingly, historian David Christian, author of This Fleeting World, summed up the astonishments and confusions of humanity in 113 pages. This short world history book tells us about the prequel of the Universe (first 14 billion years of the earth without humans) to the modern era in history (how we are today). Christian wrote the book to help readers comprehend world history through concise facts and helpful examples. Throughout the book, he argues the central defining characteristics of each era, events that triggered the transitions of the next era, and the difficulties of periodization.

Read More
1578 Words | 7 Pages

The Earth is slowly degenerating and humans are to blame. Racism, sexism and other forms of oppression are tearing society apart. In Ishmael by Daniel Quinn, the teacher Ishmael, a gorilla, analyzes the downfall of humanity. Ishmael separates the race of humans into two defined groups- the Leavers and the Takers. The Leavers are more aware that their existence is valuable and are not put on Earth to rule; on the contrary, the Takers tend to believe that they are put on Earth to control and use all of the planet’s resources to achieve their gods’ expectations.

Read More
1813 Words | 8 Pages

Marx and Arendt are two brilliant political theorists who pose different concerns, beliefs and ideals when it comes to the relationship between economics and freedom. Marx defines freedom as creative self- actualization which contrasts Arendt’s definition of freedom as worldly and eruptive action. Marx’s definition is more focused on the individual, which in turn will better society while Arendt is more focused on action as community. Marx believes in a society free from economic oppression by the elite while Arendt believes in one where poverty and politics do not meet. Economics and freedom, according to Marx, are intertwined in such a way that they cannot be separated.

Read More
743 Words | 3 Pages

(p 370) It is the love for order in mankind that alone prevents our total destruction. It is man’s reasoning that is needed to free us from wrongdoing and the injustices in life. Modernity considers the human reason to be the most important aspect of Enlightenment. We went from an inferior way of thinking to slowly acquiring the ability to think for ourselves. In addition, the main connection seen between modernity and Enlightenment is man’s ability to reason as well as his optimism.

Read More
805 Words | 4 Pages

A common questioning of a higher power beyond the physical realm lingers in society: Who and what is God?. However, many of these theological questions cannot be answered until we, of course, die. Due to human’s innate curiosity to understand the forces beyond their own, especially in terms of religion, humans find their own reasons to believe in God in the process of discovery. Religion is a sense of belief and worship to praise a higher power (God), and it provides a guide for human beings to have the opportunity to come together and live as one image of God’s children. “Imagine There’s No Heaven” is an article in which Salman Rushdie, the author, presents an atheistic view where religion is pointless, and a higher being is non-existent.

Read More
1021 Words | 5 Pages

The human mind’s ability and innate desire to justify and explain the world and its phenomena has led to some of the most significant and world-altering discoveries and inventions, illustrated throughout the renaissance, enlightenment, scientific revolution, and industrial revolution. Logical pursuits comprise a significant capstone of human nature and progress. However, according to Rudolf Otto in The Idea of the Holy, these tendencies have created different dimensions of religion; the rational and non-rational, with the latter often times overlooked. The most significant difference between the rational and non-rational aspects of religion deal with their respective emphasis on reason and feeling. Rudolph Otto prioritizes the non-rational as offering a truer understanding of religion because he claims the core of all religious life revolves around experiences and feeling, not simply rational thought.

Read More
563 Words | 3 Pages

Somehow, in spite of spending the full duration of our lives in a ubiquitous matrix of “nature”, it seems we still struggle to define nature in an effective way, which incorporates our role as humans. Grimm and Tucker offer a method for better linking cosmology with our daily praxis as humans. What has unfolded as a result of their writings is a religious cosmology or “a way for humans to integrate themselves into interpenetrating communities through orienting stories and practices, symbols and rituals, mediation and prayer” (Tucker, 42). This manifests a more whole understanding of nature and our relationship with it.

Read More

More about Essay Analysis Of Walter J. Ong, And Arendt's Work

Related Topics

Open Document