ipl-logo

Plato Vs Aquinas Research Paper

599 Words3 Pages

Plato and Saint Thomas Aquinas views the relation of the body and soul differently. Plato views the soul as a simple cause of life. He also believes that the body is separate from the soul. Aquinas views the soul as the first principle of life for all things that are alive, and he believes that with the soul and body combine, together that is what makes up a human person.
The dialogue, Phaedo, discusses Plato’s idea about the human soul. In Phaedo, Socrates states, “The soul, as has been acknowledged, will never receive the opposite of what it brings” (Brown 24). According to this, the soul cannot die by its self therefore it has to be immortal. Plato believed just as fire cause heat; the soul cause life. In Phaedo, Plato stated, “The human is the soul” (Brown 46). The soul is the person according to …show more content…

The body fears death because it will eventually die. Plato concludes that a past life must have existed and the soul must have existed outside of the body. He believes soul exists after death but the body gets left behind.
Plato’s view of the relations of body and soul is important because he proposed the idea that to be living meant that you also had a soul. The consequences of his idea were that humans were their own souls and that all things are only souls. Plato explained, “soul is present in plants and animals as well as humans” (Brown 46). The information pertains to all souls which are all immortal.
Aquinas had a similar definition of the soul in comparison to Plato’s definition of the soul. From a piece of his writing, Simma Theologiae Part 1, Aquinas wrote “that the soul is defined as the first principle of life in those things in which live: for we call living things animate [besouled], and those things which have no life, inanimate [soulless] (Brown 125). Aquinas recognizes the soul as the basic cause of all things that are alive, which are things that move and that have knowledge. (Brown

Show More
Related
745 Words | 3 Pages

In response to the long-standing philosophical question of immorality, many philosophers have posited the soul criterion, which asserts the soul constitutes personal identity and survives physical death. In The Myth of the Soul, Clarence Darrow rejects the existence of the soul in his case against the notion of immortality and an afterlife. His primary argument against the soul criterion is that no good explanation exists for how a soul enters a body, or when its beginning might occur. (Darrow 43) After first explicating Darrow 's view, I will present what I believe is its greatest shortcoming, an inconsistent use of the term soul, and argue that this weakness impacts the overall strength of his argument.

Read More
620 Words | 3 Pages

Sherley Ly Professor Matthew PHIL1301 19 February 2018 Essay 2: Descartes At this point, Melinda and Melissa are still on opposing sides of one another, each having their own context of the soul. Based on Descartes's argument, the mind and body are considered as two separate substances. He isn't absolute that he has a body; however, he uses the scholastic definition of a soul. He believes that the soul can be vegetative or rational, meaning it could be unconscious or sensible.

Read More
1137 Words | 5 Pages

(p. 33). Examining deeper how my soul impacts daily actions, I would affirm Borgmann’s (2006) reference to Aristotle, the soul is “the vital force of a human being” (p.

Read More
1225 Words | 5 Pages

In Plato’s dialogue Phaedo, he explains the soul and comes to the conclusion that the soul is immortal. Through describing the last hours of Socrates life before his execution, he lays out three arguments in support of the idea that while the body may cease to exist the soul cannot perish. In this paper, I will explicate Socrates three arguments for the immortality of the soul and their objections. Then I will argue on the presupposition of the Law of Conservation of Mass, that the universe, entailing the soul, must be cyclical. The Law of Conservation of Mass

Read More
411 Words | 2 Pages

The final argument of Plato’s Phaedo was created to prove souls cannot perish. Plato does so by arguing how a soul cannot die nor cease to exist on the same fundamental grounds of how the number three can never be even. For the number three holds the essence of being odd, without being odd entirely. Similarly, a soul holds the essence of life through immortality, however the soul is not immortal itself and only participates in immortality, just as the number three participates in being odd. Additionally, an essence or form cannot admit to the opposite of itself just as small cannot be large simultaneously, and hot cannot be cold.

Read More
608 Words | 3 Pages

Annotated Bibliography Burnham, Douglas. " Gottfried Leibniz: Metaphysics." Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Accessed April 25, 2018.

Read More
607 Words | 3 Pages

In the dialogue Phaedo by Plato, Socrates offers three different arguments for the existence of the soul after death. The three arguments consist of arguments of the movement of life and death, argument from knowledge and memory, and the similarity argument. While each argument has its strong points, there are also some weaker points causing it to fall short. Of these three arguments, the argument of the movement of life and death is the worst because it is unclear as to what Socrates is alluding to when making such an argument, leading to the rise of different questions and interpretations. Socrate starts off by stating that “those that have an opposite must necessarily come to be from their opposite and from nowhere else” (Plato 107).

Read More
1294 Words | 6 Pages

BACKGROUND: The following notes describe the background of the time period and the culture. This is for better understanding of the text, relevancy, and application of Socrates’ views in regards to the ancient time period and our life. -Pythagoreans view on death consisted of a belief in immortality of the soul, reincarnation in human or animal form, and the concern to keep the soul pure by avoiding contamination of the body. Socrates uses these themes to discuss his own perception about immortality.

Read More
1561 Words | 7 Pages

The body can exist independently from the soul as a material, extended thing but it is not a thinking thing. The body can only cause sensory perceptions by acting on the soul but otherwise exists as a simple non-thinking thing, fully separate from the soul. Descartes says to Elisabeth, “to conceive of the union between two things is to conceive of them as one single thing,” (Letter 4), suggesting that the body and soul are simultaneously one union of things, enabling the soul and body to affect each other, and fully distinct material and immaterial

Read More
1013 Words | 5 Pages

Socrates in the dialogue Alcibiades written by Plato provides an argument as to why the self is the soul rather than the body. In this dialogue Alcibiades and Socrates get into a discussion on how to cultivate the self which they both mutually agree is the soul, and how to make the soul better by properly taking care of it. One way Socrates describes the relationship between the soul and the body is by analogy of user and instrument, the former being the entity which has the power to affect the latter. In this paper I will explain Socrates’ arguments on why the self is the soul and I will comment on what it means to cultivate it.

Read More
761 Words | 4 Pages

In Plato’s The Phaedo, Plato recounts Socrates’ last days. Socrates’ road to death leads him into an exchange of ideas about the concept of an afterlife. Socrates develops several arguments regarding the immortality of the soul. This was to prove that death is not the dying of body and soul jointly, but when the body dies the soul still exists. The weakest argument Socrates presents is The Argument of the Movement of Life and Death (70b-72a), which the soul is fixed and external.

Read More
524 Words | 3 Pages

In the Republic, Plato gives an argument saying the soul is immortal. In this paper I will present his argument and show that his argument is invalid. I will show why the conclusion is not true and restate the argument to make it valid to help with Socrates’ claim. Plato’s argument on why the soul is immortal: 1. Something can only be destroyed by the thing that is bad for it.

Read More
1572 Words | 7 Pages

The intelligible world (the world of Forms) that gives the visible world it’s being.” (16) He believed that the soul exists without the body, and that we obtain wisdom from our thoughts and therefore we inherit this at the start of conception. Plato thinking were based on the divine being, who he believes made us, and the objects of the world. He believed, the soul was already formed, as what we see here on earth is just a reflection of what is already made.

Read More
1152 Words | 5 Pages

It never changes and yet causes the essential nature of things we perceive in the world. These two perceptions are what Plato describes as the divided line or the journey of self discovery. This progression of the spirit, that can never be reached, becomes the ideal. Plato’s discussions include the involvement of the soul. It is clear, that the main reason for dealing with the soul is to achieve this state

Read More
526 Words | 3 Pages

They both share the same sentiments that the soul appears in non-material form and hence it cannot be categorized with the other parts of the body. This explanation shows that they do not differ in all

Read More

More about Plato Vs Aquinas Research Paper

Related Topics

Open Document