More handpicked essays just for you.
Plessy v. ferguson and brown v. board
Examples Of Racial Inequality In Society
Plessy v. ferguson case full document
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Homer Plessy then sued the judge of his trial, Hon. John H. Ferguson at the Louisiana Supreme Court because he felt like his rights of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments had been violated. The lawsuit was going to be a challenge because they were trying to prove that the state of Louisiana denied Homer Plessy equal protection of the laws. On May 18,1896 the U.S Supreme
Marina Vinnichenko Term Paper: Court Case Gong Lum v. Rice Gong Lum v. Rice (1927) stands out as the case within which the U.S. Supreme Court explicitly extended the pernicious doctrine of “separate but equal”. In this case the issue was whether the state of Mississippi was required to provide a Chinese citizen equal protection of the law under the Fourteenth Amendment when he was taxed to pay for public education but was forced to send his daughter to a school for children of color. Mаrtha Lum, the child of the plаintiff of the case, was a citizen of the United States аnd a child of immigrants from China. She enrolled in and аttended the local public consolidated high school at the age of 9, but was told midway through her first day that
The Plessy vs Ferguson court case originated in 1892. On June 7, 1892, Homer Plessy was jailed for sitting in a white car of a Louisiana train. Despite his white complexion, Plessy was considered to be “octoroon” which meant that he was 7/8 white and 1/8 black. Plessy intentionally sat on the white car and announced himself a black. Plessy challenged the separate car act which required that all railroads operating in the state provide “equal but separate accommodations” for White and African-American passengers and prohibited passengers from entering accommodations other than those to which they had been assigned on the basis of their race.
In Palmer v. Thompson, 391 F.2d 324 (5th Cir. Miss. 1967), twelve Black American citizens living in Jackson, Mississippi, filed a suit on behalf of themselves and fellow Black American citizens seeking an injunction against the Mayor and Commissioners of Jackson, its Police Chief, and its Director of Recreation, alleging discriminatory conduct in the operation of the city’s swimming pools and jails. In 1963 the “City of Jackson closed all swimming pools which it owned and operated. From that time forward “no municipal swimming facilities were opened to any citizen of either race. And the city acknowledged that it did not intend to reopen or operate any of the swimming facilities on an integrated basis. The city contended that the racial integration of the pools would endanger personal safety of all citizens and would pose a problem for officials to maintain law and order.
Homer Plessy did not consider himself black, because he was born an octoroon. In others eyes, Homer Plessy was tinted with black in his blood. This is all the more reason why the Jim Crow law or Separate Car Act Law contradicted the fourteenth Amendment. No one can truly be separated and equal. If the Jim Crow law was plausible, then it will make no sense to arrest Homer Plessy.
He was soon arrested for violating the 1890 law. When Plessy was convicted of violating the 1890 law during his trial, he soon filed a petition against the judge, John H. Ferguson. Ferguson
He was held for trial and ordered to pay a twenty-five dollar fine. “He petitioned the Louisiana Supreme Court for a writ against Ferguson, the trial court judge, to stop the proceedings against him for criminal violation of the State law. But the Louisiana State Supreme Court refused.” (Pearson Education) Plessy, along with other members of the group, felt that this Louisiana law violated the Constitution of the United States, specifically the thirteenth amendment, prohibiting slavery, and
"We must learn to live together as brothers, or we will parish as fools" (Martin Luther King Jr). That is what was said from one of the most experienced leaders, at during a very judgmental time. Martin Luther King Jr was just one of the many men that changed America. During this time, there was a lot of harassment towards blacks. They were not considered as an equal people.
The court said Mr. Plessy was found guilty, because the Louisiana law did not violate the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments. In conclusion, a 7-1 decision, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of
According to the Thirteenth Amendment, involuntary servitude is prohibited except as a punishment for a crime. Many who argue in favor of the Separate Car Act believe that forcing Homer Plessy to sit in a black railroad car is not involuntary servitude; he was simply told to sit in his “designated” car. However, the law did in fact enforce involuntary servitude by prohibiting a man who is majority white to sit in the white railroad car. He was inaccurately judged against his will and because the Separate Car Act allowed this, it was indeed
The year of 1965 the black community let out a collective victory cry. They had finally gotten the rights they fought hard for. They could at last vote, go to school and college, and got the working condition they deserve. They couldn 't have done it without Martin Luther King Jr., but there were a slew of cases that were tried and further assisted in opening the black community 's opportunity pool. They were well known cases, like the Plessy vs. Ferguson, Brown vs. Board of Education, and the Regents of the University vs. Bakke, all very influential cases in the fight for rights.
Rosa Parks, an African American who suffered Jim Crow said, "Time begins the healing process of wounds cut deeply by oppression. We soothe ourselves with the salve of attempted indifference, accepting the false pattern set up by the horrible restriction of Jim Crow laws" (BrainyQuote). She is talking about people from her race at the time, oppressed deeply by these laws. A white person was forcing her to move seats to the back after an exhausting day. Jim Crow Laws were the reason that the white people were made the superior race.
The Plessy v. Ferguson case is a landmark legal decision that had a profound impact on the United States. The case, which involved the constitutionality of racial segregation in public facilities, became a catalyst for the civil rights movement by inspiring people of color to demand their rights and challenging the legal framework of systemic racism. The outcome of the case led to greater awareness of the pervasive nature of racism in American society and ultimately contributed to efforts towards greater racial unity. In this essay, we will explore the various ways in which the Plessy v. Ferguson case impacted the nation and how it contributed to the fight for racial equality and justice. During the 1890s, a pivotal event in American history
“When it comes to racism, discrimination, corruption, public lies, dictatorships, and human rights, you have to take a stand as a reporter because I think our responsibility as journalist is to confront those who are abusing power” (Jorge Ramos). During the gilded age there was multiple cases where African Americans were looked down upon by caucasians. There were segregated schools, bathrooms, restaurants, and many other examples. A couple examples that will help show how the discrimination in the gilded era progressed into the progressive era and it set off a chain of events. The purpose of abolishing racial discrimination is so everyone gets treated the same.
Keeping African Americans segregated and not treating their condition’s equal led to a even more discrimination resulting in a lack of rights. In the 1896, Plessey vs Ferguson case, the Supreme Court stated that all facilities could be segregated, but they had to be equal. “Requiring railway companies carrying passengers in their coaches in that state to provide equal, but separate accommodations for the white and [African Americans] races, by providing two or more passenger coaches for each passenger train.” (Document F). This quote shows that the train compartments were required to be kept separate but equal.
