ipl-logo

Pluralism Vs Interest Group Analysis

1517 Words7 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Essay on electoral systems

Thousands of years ago in ancient Greece, the idea of democracy meant “rule by the people” but today it has turned into a much more broader definition. These include regime type, electoral system, interest group representation, and federal versus unitary constitutions. According to the readings from Comparative Politics by David J. Samuels, there are three elements required in a democracy. Those are accountability, participation, and contestation. Accountability would be a way for citizens to have the realistic opportunity to remove rulers from office, though in a legal and peaceful manner. Participation must be made so that political choices are natural and not forced and that clear rules institutionalize universal suffrage. Contestations …show more content…

Under pluralism, interest groups have free organization and mobilization. Pluralism has a decentralized organization structure. Decisions are made from the bottom up based on the competition between groups and there is a separation between interest groups and government. Under pluralism, there is a free market system that favors effective political entrepreneurs and efficient and well organized interest groups that have a strong collective action. Some strengths of pluralism are that free competition allows anyone to have access to share their position and work toward a policy that favors their goals. The state does not impede or influence interest group formation. Some weaknesses are not all interests can organized equally or raise funds as effectively. Corporatism is a single association that represents each interest. It has a centralized system with limited peak association and labors and unions are under one group. Unlike pluralism, decisions in corporatism are made from the top down through negotiation. The government coordinates the meetings between the peak associations. Some strengths of corporatism are its effectiveness and consensus. Since the peak associations are involved in the policymaking process, key interests are assured an influence in government decisions. The bargaining process helps to assure that all sides can agree with the final outcome. Some weaknesses are the large …show more content…

A unitary state is when the constitution grants the central government exclusive and final authority over policymaking across the entire national territory. It grants the central government veto power over subnational governments’ decisions. Local governments have no autonomous authority to make policy. Strengths to unitary states are that in a homogenous society it may help promote effective government without sacrificing much in terms of limiting government. Some weaknesses are it will give little voice to minorities and those in local government. A federal state is when the constitution grants two or more governments overlapping political authority over the same group of people and same piece of territory. The constitution must grant governments at the local, state, or provincial level exclusive control over at least one policy area. The central government cannot veto policy decisions that fall under subnational governments’ control. Some strengths to this is that it gives minority groups some voice at the local level and this will make them more willing to negotiate on other issues at the national level. A weakness is this will not work well with homogenous

Show More
Related
1040 Words | 5 Pages

In other words, Federalism is power not held by the people being split into two; that is the powers of the central and state governments. Some of the powers given to the central government were the ability to regulate trade, conduct foreign relations, declare war and to print and coin money which created the national currency (Document A). Meanwhile, some powers given to the state were ones such as the ability to hold elections, establish schools and pass marriage and divorce laws (Document A). This compound government instills a double-security for the people within the nation because this method works so that the central and state governments could check each other’s power while still being able to independently control itself. Federalism protects from tyranny by making sure that power isn’t only vested by the government, but also by the people of

Read More
298 Words | 2 Pages

The idea of a federalist government is great, however, it has some downsides as well. Some advantages of federalism include keeping the government closer to the people, where states have the freedom and authority to make government decisions to local preferences. Federalism also allows local differences to reflected in the state and local government policy and reduce conflicts, this reduces the friction between interests and lessens conflict. The independent subnational governments allow for flexibility and experimentation, where successful policy innovations in one state can be adopted by other states and also the federal government. The achievement of at least some national goals is made easier by the participation of independent subnational

Read More
1041 Words | 5 Pages

“James Madison’s idea of the division of power between central and state governments is known as federalism.” (James Madison, Federalist Paper #51, 1788) The state governments have the power to make local decisions such as establishing schools, passing marriage and divorce laws, and to hold elections. Whereas the central government has the power to make decisions that affect the country such as, to provide an army and navy, set up post offices, and regulate trade. As James Madison said, “The different governments will each control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.”

Read More
537 Words | 3 Pages

Federalism makes both central and state governments more equal in power. Source 2 explains how central and state governments are different, though also what common powers they have. This showing how the national government isn't too strong but also the state government is not too strong as well. Meaning both governments have powers and share powers but not too much, this protecting against tyranny. Source 1 states “In the compound republic of America, the power surrendered by the people is first divided between two distinct governments [state and federal],” Therefore state and national governments are suppose to be different and do different governments so they can check one another and share

Read More
1106 Words | 5 Pages

Interactions amid the provinces and the federal government, from constitutional issues to the most irresistible topics bang up-to-date in the country, are indemnified beneath the umbrella of “Federalism”. Authorities are shared so that on some matters, the state governments are decision-holders, whereas on the other matters, national government grasps the autonomy. In last twenty-five years, the upsurge of federal fiats on both governments, local and state, has shifted the power amongst state and national governments. Now, the national government is beginning to have more governance over the state’s engagements.

Read More
1746 Words | 7 Pages

Federalism is a system of government that exhibits a separation of sovereignty, and function between the national government, and state governments. This is founded on the concept division of power. Federal and states are given a specific level of control that

Read More
894 Words | 4 Pages

227). Hudson argues that the pluralist theory is wrong and that pluralist group theorists would make people believe, the groups’ representativeness instead, it is the extent to which they represent one societal interest: business (Hudson,2013 pg. 227). There are many interest groups but the majority of them are participating in lobbying for business. An example of this would be ,200 largest American corporations have worked effectively to promote the business-friendly policies of tax cuts, reduced business regulations, globalization and put to barriers to the union Hudson,2013 pg.

Read More
646 Words | 3 Pages

While choosing electing official with common values and philosophies is a great way to get representation on social issues, interest groups are also helpful in keeping an open line of communication with elected officials on what is most important to the affected group. Interest groups use tactics to protect policies by focusing on the unknown consequences and keeping close relationships with government officials whose values are similar (Baumgartner, Jeffery, & Hojnacki (2009). One interest group who has knowledgeable lobbyists to affect public policy is the National Rifle Association (NRA). The NRA is a single issue group who advocates their position by using both the direct and indirect approach to rally support on issues in Congress.

Read More
1065 Words | 5 Pages

Federalism a system of government in which power is divided, by a constitution, between a central government and regional governments. The Constitution restricts the power of the states in favor of ensuring enough power to the national government to give the country s free-flowing national economy. The framers’ concern with the national concern with national supremacy was also expressed

Read More
1689 Words | 7 Pages

Riana Harari Federalism 10/13/14 After the colonies gained independence from England, we needed to make our own government. When they were still under the rule of England the colonists loyalties were to their states, not the king (Morone, 110). One choice we had was a unitary government. This is when the national government made all of the laws for the people and had all of the political authority (Morone, 110). Another option was confederation.

Read More
1172 Words | 5 Pages

The federal system is a system where both the central and state governments have equal authority and distribute it to the people. Most of the power in the federal government is supported with barely any opposed. People elect two different governments and each one of those are responsible for different tasks. The federal system has a written agreement where you can not make any changes to it unless you have consent from the individual state governments. The benefit of the federal system is that they can not make any changes without the encouragement from the states.

Read More
729 Words | 3 Pages

Federalism is a system of government used in the United States that divides power between the National and State governments. The U.S. constitution gives power to both the states, and the federal government, but the states cannot directly contradict the constitution. This makes it so that the broader issues are handled by the federal government, and the smaller, more local problems, go to the states. Sometimes, they must work together in order to make big things happen. A good example of this is the 1st article of the constitution.

Read More
725 Words | 3 Pages

The Constitution of the State of Texas describes the structure and the function of the government of the U.S. state of Texas. It was established in 1827 when Texas was still a part of Mexico under the Mexican Constitution of 1824 . Due to escalating tensions between the two states, Texas established its independence in 1836, established the Republic of Texas, and adopted a new constitution. In March 1, 1845, the U.S. enacted a congressional joint resolution that proposed the annexation of Texas to the United States. The people of Texas approved an annexation ordinance and a new constitution on October 13, 1845.

Read More
500 Words | 2 Pages

Madison, in federalist paper no. 10, said that “The latent causes of faction are thus sown in the nature of man,” and concluded that the best way to live with this fact is by restraining these factions. One of the best ways that this is accomplished is through the number of different groups themselves. In a small democracy, the whims of the majority could cause radical and harmful government choices. The organization of a large republic makes it difficult for any group to gain significant influence over the government. Not only this, but the checks and balances of the branches of government and the distance of lawmaking from the majority also slow a majority in government from making rash decisions.

Read More
944 Words | 4 Pages

Federalism Federalism is a system of government in which power is divided between federal government, state government and provinces government. While federalism has many benefits, among them is checks and balances between the federal and state government, thus reducing the chances of one party getting too powerful and abusing their power. Preventing one party from being too powerful and abusing their powers is a good thing. However, it comes with a price that federal and provinces (state and local) governments do not always see eye to eye and agree with each other, which turns into conflict.

Read More

More about Pluralism Vs Interest Group Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document