More handpicked essays just for you.
Plutarch’s lives: caesar comparison to julius caesar
Difference of julius caesar by shakespre and plutarch
Plutarch’s lives: caesar comparison to julius caesar
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Plutarch’s lives: caesar comparison to julius caesar
The northern Americans rejoiced after the civil war similar to the Roman citizens in the beginning of act one when Caesar was to return home after defeating Pompey. The Roman people were ecstatic to hear he would return home and was not defeated. The northern Americans were relieved to know that slavery would soon end and they were in a safer time now. Both the Romans and the Americans were relieved to know they were safe in good hands. "What was planned was nothing less than the choreographed decapitation of the government".
Of all the rulers in Plutarch’s Lives, Numa Pompilus was the one king who expressed characteristics of a true ruler. Numa displayed morality known by all the people in Rome. He was a peacemaker, which brought about a prosperous and joyful kingdom. Numa not only built on top of Romulus’s work to start a strong and powerful kingdom. Above all the rulers in Plutarch’s Lives, Numa Pompilus showed morality, good judgment, and self-sacrifice.
Why Americans Would Benefit from Reading Plutarch’s Roman Lives. A recent article by Rebecca Burgess and Hugh Liebert from the Wall Street Journal argues that Americans would benefit from reading Plutarch. The authors give very little evidence to support their case. Plutarch’s Roman Lives could be beneficial for not only Americans, but most of the population to read.
The Life of Marius, written by Plutarch, is a fascinating ancient source detailing the career of the Roman Gaius Marius, 127-86BC. While there are interpretive and reliability issues, the Life of Marius is a particularly useful and significant source. It is our only extensive primary source on Marius, who was a key political figure of late Republican Rome. Additionally, Plutarch’s work indicates not only many crucial military and political development in Rome in the time period, but also gives a reflection of Plutarch’s own Rome and its values and political climate.
By this I mean that his empire only held together for ten years after his death (Doc E). A great conqueror would want his empire to go down in history as the best, but Alexander did not even tell the people who would rule after he died. His grand empire took up a great chunk of his life to build and not caring what happened after his death shows that he was not concerned about what happened to others after his death. In the background essay, it says that, “For reasons that are unclear, he [Alexander] had not named an heir. After much fighting, Alexander’s generals split up the land.
Plutarch’s autobiographies of Caesar and Alexander emphasize their honor, which shows the importance of honor in Roman society. In his account of Caesar, Plutarch says “his humanity and clemency to those he overpowered; others, again, in his gifts and kindnesses to his soldiers; all alike in the number of the battles which he fought and the enemies whom he killed. For he had not pursued the wars in Gaul full ten years when he had taken by storm above eight hundred towns, he was so much master of the good-will and hearty service of his soldiers” (Lives). Caesar is an honorable leader, which is a trait uncommon to Roman rulers during Plutarch’s life. Emperors like Caligula and Nero were dishonorable and engaged in acts of sexual perversion and
Julian Mayugba Professor Antonio Acevedo HIS 210-ONR01 18 March 2017 AS1: Pliny and Trajan “For who can better give guidance to my hesitation or inform my ignorance?” Pliny, Letters 10.96-97 shows the interaction in letters between the Pliny the Younger, the governor of Pontus-Bithynia, and Emperor Trajan. The letters involved Pliny the Younger asking Emperor Trajan for advice when dealing with the trials of Christians.
In fact, due to his education from the great philosopher of Aristotle and preparation for kingship, Alexander “developed a rather high opinion of himself, including the growing belief that he himself was a god” (Background Essay). Later in life, as shown on the map entitled “Alexander’s Empire,” Alexander named eleven of his established cities “Alexandria” (Document A.) Not only does this show a lack of creativity, but also his large amount of self-obsession. During a journey across a desert, Alexander’s troops (who were already dying of thirst themselves), found a small trickle of water and carried what they could back to their leader. However, Alexander dumped the helmet of water onto the ground, completely wasting the good deed his soldiers had performed for him.
(Plutarch, Plutarch’s Lives Vol. VII, pg 237). Naturally his father and company played off this comment but were astonished to see that Alexander had managed to tame the wild beast. This led Philip to cry out, “‘My son, seek out a kingdom equal to thyself; Macedonia has not room for thee. ’”(Plutarch, Plutarch’s Lives Vol.
The movie Cleopatra (1963) and the Plutarch passage (Warner, 1958) cited in Fear (2008, p. 17) are in different mediums and were meant for different audiences. However, their representations of the relationship between Cleopatra and Caesar are in many ways similar. The 1963 movie depicts the relationship between Julius Caesar and Cleopatra as a power play between two tacticians, as Fear mentions (The Open University, 2008, p. 3), Cleopatra uses the Roman’s preconceptions about her to her own advantage. Similarly, the Plutarch passage (Warner, 1958) alludes to Cleopatra’s smart tactical skills in how she used a trick to get around the guards to see Caesar.
Some playwrights choose to write plays about historical events, among them there is The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, a play that describes the downfall of the rule of Julius Caesar, but is also a play that is not as truthful as it first impressionably is, a complete truthful account of Julius Caesar’s assassination and the events leading up to it. In order to greater attract the audience, Shakespeare, along with other playwrights, relied on adding historical inaccuracies to add the necessary suspense. Thus, Shakespeare strayed away from historical events occurring during Caesar’s lifetime, implementing inaccuracy into the story. Shakespeare based one of his most well-known plays, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, on historical events that includes
Julius Caesar: The Influence of The Common Person Former editor-in-chief of the international magazine, The Economist, Walter Bagehot once said, “Public opinion is a permeating influence, and it exacts obedience to itself; it requires us to drink other men’s thoughts; to speak other men’s words, to follow other men’s habits.” The plebeians throughout the play of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare were easily influenced by not only the main characters of the play but also by each other. We can see them play off of the emotions and reactions of one another. The plebeians, much like people today, were heavily persuaded by those around them.
“Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds”- J. Robert Oppenheimer. That quote is a reference to a line from the Bhagavad-Gita. In Bhagavad-Gita the ultimate weapon called the Brahmastra was used to slay what was for all intents and purposes a god. The weapon was developed as the ultimate trump card to stop Germany, Italy, and Japan in World War 2. The Atomic bomb has history including its research and production in the Manhattan Project, the dropping of the bombs in World War 2, and Its effects lasting into the Cold War.
In William Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar, Marc Antony appears to be a strong advocate for Julius Caesar’s triumphs and increasing power. However, like Caesar, Antony is extremely manipulative and powerful. After Caesar’s death, Antony manipulated the conspirators into believing he was on their side before requesting to speak at Caesar’s funeral. While Brutus and the conspirators remained fooled by Antony’s innocence, Antony took the initiative to inform the Roman citizens of the conspirator’s horrendous actions towards their beloved leader, Julius Caesar. Caesar’s funeral was a time of reflection for the citizens of Rome, as Marc Antony caused them to question their allegiance to Brutus.
Another way Caesar and napoleon can be compared was their political mind. Caesar as well as Napoleon were both able to achieve vast political power as a result of being very politically savvy. Both realized that in order to take complete control of the government, you must have the support of the army which they had as a result of being generals. With the support of the army both future dictators enacted coup de tats. In the case of Caesar, after being fired from his position of governor of Gaul(modern day France), took the army which had been loyal to him, entered the Roman Senate building and took control of the Roman Republic.
