ipl-logo

Pojman's Argument Against The Death Penalty

162 Words1 Pages
Pojman’s argument against the objections to capital punishment is not completely valid. If we understand the human being, we can also understand that humans are spiteful people and many people are filled with the hopes of revenge. Therefore, the thirst of revenge could potentially be a contributing factor as to why people are for the death penalty. Even if Pojman doesn’t believe in revenge, it should not be a valid reason for him to ignore its potential in justice and decision making during trials. This world is already filled with bitterness towards one another and we, as a society, cannot stop it because we all have different morals. Even if murderers committed a crime, they are still human beings and they are innocent if proven guilty, so
Show More
Related
404 Words | 2 Pages

Murderers are people who kill people and murders also are guilty. Murderers are usually always guilty. Murders sometimes get away with it if they don’t get caught and move to a different country or state to hide from the police and be around people you don’t know. Murders are usually caught. Murders are bad and there needs to be a stop.

Read More
1161 Words | 5 Pages

He suggests that other social policies also lead to the death of innocent individuals, but they are not banned. The author presents deductive arguments to support his position, including the idea that murderers who are not executed have the potential to harm more innocent people. He believes that opponents of capital punishment should acknowledge their responsibility for innocent lives lost due to murderers who were not executed. Prager concludes that capital punishment is necessary to protect innocent lives. Opponents should confront their responsibility for every innocent already murdered and yet to be murdered by murderers who should have been

Read More
1192 Words | 5 Pages

A demon’s wings that is colored white is the most frightening of all. He who strongly believes that his ideal is just, right and for the good of the people; but in the eyes of so many people, what he does is inhumane and evil; thus comparable to a demon. Robespierre is someone that describes the earlier statements. He thinks his belief is right but the wrong aspect about this is he clings too much on that belief that he forgets reality. In reality, his contribution is terrorizing the people and tarnishing the values of the government.

Read More
1618 Words | 7 Pages

Jason Michael Hann, 39, who is already serving a 30-year sentence for the murder of his 2-month-old son, Jason, received the death penalty for the slaying of his 10-month-old daughter, Montana. Hann killed his infant daughter with a blow to head in Desert Hot Springs in 2001. Prosecutors said Hann wrapped her body in duct tape and plastic bags, then hid it in a blue "Tupperware-type" container stashed in a storage unit in Arkansas. When the couple was arrested in Maine, they had in their custody a new child, a month old boy who also showed signs of abuse, including broken ribs, bleeding under his skin and internal injuries. After the court hearing Friday, Price said the abused child was more proof that Hann deserved death.

Read More
1646 Words | 7 Pages

The topic of capital punishment presents a test of values. The arguments in support of and opposition to the death penalty are complex. In the end, this is a question of an individual’s values and morals. The topic requires careful thought to reach a reasoned position. Both sides of the argument are defensible.

Read More
756 Words | 4 Pages

Igor Primoratz sets forth an argument that to ensure justice in the legal system the utilization of capital punishment is necessary. According to Primoratz there is no punishment of any equivalence to that of murder, whereas for less severe crimes fines and prison time is reasonable. Primoratz argument consists of three defences to common feedback to the action of capital punishment. The one that was most appealing to me being whether it violates the right to life. To this he responds that when the took the life of another human they lost this right; as these right are only given to those who respect the rights of others.

Read More
1101 Words | 5 Pages

If someone murders another person they will go to prison and serve their time because they did something bad and the law caught up with them. There are laws and rules

Read More
1102 Words | 5 Pages

Ernest Van Den Haag defense of the death penalty is very will contested. However, his conclusion while contract is still lacking. Haag understanding argument of the death penalty is suitable. However, the problem lays with the fact Haag does not go far enough. One must understand Haag argument to correctly critique his argument.

Read More
1145 Words | 5 Pages

Annotated Bibliography Draft Student name : Haider Zafaryab Student number: 2360526 Thesis Statement : Capital Punishment is a very controversial topic around the globe. I believe that it does more harm than good and breeds violence in society. Source 1: Radelet, M. L., & Akers, R. L. (1996).

Read More
551 Words | 3 Pages

Pojman uses the analogy if someone committed murder, they would be struck and killed instantly by lightning because by taking another life they forfeited theirs. I find that the following two points from Pojman provides a valid argument as of why we should have the death penalty. He states if we choose a policy of having the death penalty and “… we’re right, we have saved the lives of the innocent. If we are wrong, unfortunately, we’ve sacrificed the lives of some murderers.” (Pojman 144).

Read More
1254 Words | 6 Pages

From the early days after Davis snatched Polly from a Petaluma slumber party, Klaas has been a highly visible advocate for strong laws to protect the public, especially children, from career criminals and predators like Davis. He had come to the San Francisco Chronicle with other opponents of Proposition 34, the ballot measure that would end California 's death penalty and resentence California 's 700-plus death row inmates to life without parole. (Saunders) A man snatched a girl from a slumber party. He should not be killed and just get out of it, he should live a suffering life in prison.

Read More
706 Words | 3 Pages

Also, if society does not sentence an offender to death, they are an accomplice to that crime (Avaliani, 2004). Criminals that kill should suffer the same fate as their victims. The punishment should,

Read More
1001 Words | 5 Pages

Lena Baker, a poor African American female, was put to death by an all white, rich male jury for the murder of Ernest Knight. Ernest was a white rich man who hired Lena to be his personal maid who unfortunately abused his power towards her. He enslaved her, even though slavery was and still is illegal. He was killed in the early 1940’s by Lena Baker. The jury overlooked these details towards race, wealth, and defense and sentenced her to death in 1945.

Read More
713 Words | 3 Pages

More than 529 verified death row inmates have been exonerated since 1973. Justice may be carried out and in some cases that require a death sentence for a person who committed an atrocious crime. According to Holloway, “I have plenty of heartbreaking stories of clients who were convicted of crimes they did not commit.” If lawyers know of clients being convicted of crimes they did not commit, action should be taken, you should fight for the cases. Unlike prison sentences, execution, is irreversible and irreparable.

Read More
767 Words | 4 Pages

Why death penalty must end ‘’An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind,’’ said Mahatma Gandhi. The execution of someone who has possibly done a crime is an inhuman act. Death penalty is hypocritical and flawed. If killing is wrong, why do we kill when a criminal has done the crime of killing someone? In this essay, I will write why death penalty should end by writing about the violation of human rights, execution of innocent people, the fact that it does not deter crime and money.

Read More

More about Pojman's Argument Against The Death Penalty

Related Topics

Open Document