Pope Francis Theology Of Sin Analysis

Introduction It would be incomplete to evaluate Christian doctrine without examining sin. Modern philosophy rebuts the actuality of sin, but such a denial is living in falsehood. It is difficult to challenge or controvert the complete denial of sin. Nonetheless, the Bible declares the existence of sin, and human nature naturally displays it. Evidently, sin is a fact; it is not a myth nor a figment of our imagination. Some may classify the study of sin as a depressing endeavor and counter-productive to a Christian. But as a congregation, is it not true that Christians are saved from sin through the blood of Christ? If so, it is prudent then to first comprehend the need for salvation before we understand salvation itself. Evaluating sin enables

The Pope’s theology of sin posits that all of humanity is sinful and it is necessary to re-evaluate our consciences on a daily basis and in so doing incorporate the necessary amendments. The Pope in his press conferences has often defined himself as a sinner and requested for prayers from the faithful. Pope Francis theology of sin is categorized into three parts. One, man must recognize the darkness of modern life and how it causes many to stray. In this first part, the darkness refers to man’s inclination of being overly pleased with themselves and diminishing the need for salvation. The Pope refers to John’s epistle whereby he describes men who see themselves as sinless are deceiving themselves and lack the truth. The second stage asserts that confession is not a simple way to ‘dry-clean our stained souls. The Pope posits that sin can only be forgiven if we acknowledge our sins and the shame of going against God’s will. Moreover, during confession man must come to God in humility and meekness. The final stage offers that man must have complete faith that God will renew them. The Pope also blames the reliance on relativism to define sin. He asserts that this is Satan’s way to deaden the consciences of man such that they cannot tell between right and

As described above, all doctrines have their own merits. However, as for my thoughts, I believe that when sin entered the world, it brought death and sorrow. This was not in God’s initial plan. Different doctrines categorize sin as either a depiction of humanity’s true nature or the falling away from communion with God. What all this point to is the lack of godliness in man. Man, continuously falls short of God’s demand for absolute perfection. So the measurement of man’s perfection based on intelligence, wealth, culture, religious performance or educational prowess is missing the point. The divine standard set by God is that man has fallen short and has missed the mark. Therefore, it would not be prudent to imagine that you have done your best because God will challenge you with the words from Matthew 6:27. Indeed, if we have fallen short and will continue to fall short of God’s glory, then it is our duty to always seek perfection in God’s eyes, no matter how impossible the task.

Conclusion

The understanding of the definition of sin enables the faithful appreciate atonement. Researching the nature of sin assists the congregation to remind themselves of God’s will and his divine purpose for humanity. Modern culture has tried to diminish sin and its effects on humanity. Nevertheless, understanding that sin is the root of all sorrows will enable more individuals to first seek