David told the cops that he was in the car when Randal Dale Adams shot the gun. The cops then began to question Randal Dale Adams and had him sign a statement which only stated what the two men had done during the day and that they had passed by where the murder took place and that was a false confession given by Adams. There were also two eyewitnesses who also had claimed to see the car and identify Adams as the person who shot the officer. The police were determined to find the killer because it was one of their fellow officers. When the case went to trial and there was a false confession by Adams, eyewitnesses along with the officer who had been in the car stating that the person who killed her partner had the same color hair as Adam the jury found Randal Dale Adams guilty.
On the night of the murder, five drunken Socs pull up on the street and attacked Johnny and Ponyboy. One of the Socs tried drowning Ponyboy while at the same time Johnny felt threatened by another Socs named Bob which led to Johnny killing him in self defense. Johnny is justified in what he did and is not guilty because he was defending himself from the Socs. The Socs had threatened to harm Johnny and Ponyboy earlier that night and Johnny recognized Bob as someone who had attacked him before. Johnny recognized Bob from the last time he got jumped in the abandoned lot.
Someone had put the key in the house, why would they take the key out, to ensure the car was not going to get moved off the property. They placed bullets in the garage, but Teresa wasn't shot, she would have most likely been strangled to death on the bed. The blood in the car had been placed. The blood vial of Stevens was punctured and tampered with. Why would Steven have been in the car besides to move it?
Through examination of all evidence that pertains to this case, investigators were able to narrow down, and eventually identify the suspect in the murder of Gaven Brooks. Through the analysis of not only fingerprints, saliva swabs, and hair follicles, it can easily be seen who the real perpetrator was. Also, through interviews with close friends and relatives, it was revealed that Peggy could not have been a potential suspect because of her allergy to grapes (could not have drank the wine found at the crime scene), Lauren could not have been a potential suspect because her shoe size was too big to fit the size five shoeprint that was found at the scene. Janice did not know how to drive, which means that it couldn’t have been her because the car was moved from the scene of the crime to an abandoned parking lot over twenty miles away.
The Serial podcast investigates the likelihood of a wrongful indictment occurring in the life of Adnan Syed, a man charged with the murder of Hae Min Lee. In his case, there is one piece of incriminating evidence that first makes investigators believe he is guilty. Jay Wilds, the case’s sole witness, tells a story (or stories) of what he says happens the day Hae dies. He claims Adnan kills her, puts her body in the trunk of her own car, and then buries her at Leakin Park around 7pm. Using Jay’s statement as a base, investigators then get a hold of Adnan’s cell phone records from the day of Hae’s death.
In today’s society, many people make bad decisions. In the novel, Monster by Walter Dean Myers, the narrator explains how one bad choice can lead to another. Steve Harmon, the narrator, was accused of being the lookout for a robbery which led to the murder of Mr. Nesbit and he goes on trial, debating whether he was an accessory to the murder. After reading the novel, one might think that Steve is not guilty because he didn’t kill Mr. Nesbitt and no witnesses saw him in the store. The jury has to decide if he was guilty for the murder, if he was guilty of being the lookout, and he even questions his innocence.
The evidence will show that the State's main witness, Jay Wilds, who was allegedly involved in the aiding of the victims murder, is an unreliable witness. Jay’s testimony has many inconsistencies and misleading information. During Jay’s interrogation with the police, he changes multiple parts of his story. The following are a few of the modifications the witness made, one Jay states to have refused to help in the digging of the victims grave but later reforms his story and states he did. Two, Jay told police Adnan informed him about his plan to murder Ms. Lee the day the murder occurred but later alters his story and says Adnan had frequently mentioned killing her.
While this is a hyperbole, it serves to show the readers that the investigation began utterly clueless, with no leads to anywhere. This effectively creates an even larger aura of suspense, as the readers are left wondering if the killers are ever going to be caught, and if the Clutters’ will receive their
Nearly all of the witnesses’ stories were inconsistent or conflicted and the few who claimed to see things like the car’s license plate number or that Sacco and/or Vanzetti were there were later revealed to be in a position nearly
One might want to read this novel, to see what makes an average man want to kill and to also see their psychological being leading up to it. This creates a mystery in the eyes of the reader to see why they did such a horrendous crime. The author’s purpose for writing this novel was to give the reader a different perspective on criminals. Capote uses a sympathetic tone when he talks about the histories of the criminals. He creates an emotional connection between the reader and the criminals because Capote allows the reader to get to know the criminal’s pasts, telling of the hardships the criminals have faced throughout their lives.
They had already tested Mary’s rape kit and the DNA results showed that the suspect was Bobby Poole and not Ronald Cotton. The police had interrogated Bobby Poole for hours where he denied being the rapist. But after they told him that they had evidence
At this point he is having troubles deciding who is at fault. With the failure to examine every little detail, it seems he committed the crime. He doesn’t want to bring out important details because it could cause him to get into
As you are shown in the film, after the identification of Brenton Butler and his so-called testimony to investigators, the police and prosecutors just stopped working on the case. Thus, evidence that would have supported Butler’s innocence and help find the actual killer weren’t discovered until Brenton’s defense attorney, Pat McGuinness did some investigation and research of his own. Thus, flowing from film from the trial to McGuinness’s investigation scenes shows the how he attained the information that he and his partner could present in the courtroom. While the prosecutors only had the one eyewitness, who claimed to have only caught a glimpse of the shooter and gave description that did not even match Butler. The film presents the conclusion that the police did not actually do the work to find the actual killer and if it wasn’t for Pat McGuinness and his partner wanting to find the culprit, it would never actually be solved.
Now here the movie stats two friends were driving namely Billy Gambini and Stan Rothenstein in between they stopped at a convenience store to buy a can of Tuna at the time of leaving the store they head a sound of gun, a clerk was short and Bill and Stan was arrested in reference with the murder, bill called his cousin Vincent Gambini, an attorney in the family who has no trial experience. Vinny always fool the Judge, as his 1st trial he has no knowledge regarding the court procedures and dress code. Vinny does not cross-examine any of the witnesses, after Vinny poor performance Stan fired him and hire a public defender, Vinny ask for one more chance to prove himself.
Good Morning/Afternoon 8 savio. Do you think it 's right that victims have to experience horrendous events such as Drink Driving? Drink Driving should be taken more seriously by people due to the fact that many incidents are caused from people who are much drinking over the limit. Each year in Australia , an average of 35 drivers die from Drink Driving. Lets help bring this number down to 0, Australia needs to take more caution with the amount of alcohol consumed by people.
