ipl-logo

Power And Legitimacy In King Henry IV

1168 Words5 Pages

In his play, 1 King Henry IV, William Shakespeare is concerned with the popular concepts of power and legitimacy, or the right to rule. Shakespeare specifically calls into question the concept of legitimacy of power through one of the main characters of his play, Prince Hal. Prince Hal’s public image challenges the notion of this concept. In this essay, through the analyzation of various passages, I argue that Prince Hal upsets the notion legitimacy of power because his public image contradicts King Henry’s mode of being and mirrors the problematic reputation and actions of Richard II, which adds to King Henry’s fear of losing the throne, and ultimately results in King Henry’s hesitancy to make him heir to the throne. Largely due to his public …show more content…

The king begins to fear that Prince Hal’s mirroring of Richard II could cause their downfall. When speaking about Richard II, King Henry states, “That, being swallowed daily by men’s eyes, they surfeited with honey and began To loathe the taste of sweetness, where more than a little is by too much” (3.2 70-74). In short, this quote is a metaphor for Richard II’s presence. When Richard II became King, his presence was like honey in the sense that it was a special treat because the public rarely saw him. Overtime, as Richard II showed his presence much more often, people grew tired of it. The eventually grew so tired of it and began helping King Henry, who regarded his presence as superior, take possession of Richard II’s crown. King Henry states “Had I so lavish been, so common hackneyed in the eyes of the men, so stale and cheap to vulgar company, Opinion that did help me to the crown, had still kept loyal in possession” (3.2 39 – 44). The key word in this quote is “lavish.” Lavish can be defined as abundant or extravagant (OED, def n). The king is essentially making a play on words, he is claiming that he was rarely seen by the commoners and that his presence was, and is valuable. Thus, since Prince Hal is mirroring Richard II, by spending a lot of time with commoners and often showing his presence, King Henry fears that the public will eventually get tired of Prince Hal’s presence …show more content…

Essentially, his mode of being was completely different from that of his father’s, but was fairly similar to that of Richard II. The contradiction and mirroring that came along with Prince Hal’s public image caused King Henry to be alarmed about losing the throne, triggering his hesitation of passing down the throne to Prince Hal. To put it simply, the behavior and presentation of Prince Hal complicated the notion of the legitimacy of power. Through Prince Hal, Shakespeare was able to cast a doubt on this concept and portray to the readers how even ideas such as public image, can upset the legitimacy of

Show More
Related
87 Words | 1 Pages

At first, Henry VII cared nothing for Columbus and his ideas. But then, Columbus returned from one of his voyages with gold pieces and some natives. Upon seeing these treasures, Henry realized that if he seized this territory, all those riches could be his. And being the king of a huge nation, this was something he was interested in. the idea of wealth and power was too much for a man like Henry VII to resist, and that made him give in to the ideas of

Read More
706 Words | 3 Pages

Patrick Henry vs. Britain “Give me liberty or give me death!” was a statement that Patrick Henry said when he was at the Virginia Convention of 1775 on March 23rd at St. John’s church. At the convention, he wrote a magnificent speech to get the colonists to support his claim about going to war against the British. He wanted to urge the colonists to fight back against Great Britain for what they have done to them. Patrick Henry convinced the colonists to go to war by using various literary devices.

Read More
854 Words | 4 Pages

The implication is that the people are being ruled. Henry used his skills in speech to persuade the Council or Parliament that trying to rule over others was wrong. He spoke out against the way things had always been done and

Read More
1545 Words | 7 Pages

‘The consolidation of royal authority, in the years 1487-1509, was due to Henry VII’s control over the nobility.’ Explain why you agree or disagree with this view. It can be argued to a certain extent that the consolidation of royal authority for Henry VII, in the years 1487-1509, was a result of control over the nobility. The challenge lied in the ability to decrease their power without alienating them whilst removing their position of threat. However, there were other contributory factors in Henry’s consolidation of his royal authority, such as his diplomatic skills in dealing with foreign powers and the indispensable use of royal finances.

Read More
994 Words | 4 Pages

“Henry did not face a genuine threat to his position as King from 1485-99.” Explain why you agree or disagree with this view. [25 marks] I find I partly disagree with the statement. Although it’s true that Henry VII was able to overcome all of the major threats to his reign during this period of time, and some of these threats were not as major as others - that does not necessarily mean any of the events were not dangerous enough to jeopardise Henry’s position as King. Notably, Perkin Warbeck’s ability to gain support from many royals around Europe put Henry into a position where he could likely be usurped, had Henry not been smart with his foreign relations, and had the imposter had sufficient military support in order to successfully land in England.

Read More
1430 Words | 6 Pages

King Henry demonstrates to his men that he himself is not unwilling to die for England’s “cause”, and that such a death is honorable; establishing his character as belonging to a man who will not ask any other man to do that which he is not willing to do himself, to his men. This has an interesting effect on the

Read More
380 Words | 2 Pages

But more importantly, if the small army wins, fewer men means a greater share of honor for those who survive. Following this indisputable logic, Henry uses ethos to increase his credibility with his men: “I am not covetous for gold, / Nor care I who doth feed upon my cost; / It yearns me not if me my garments wear; / such outward things dwell not in my desires” (7 – 10). King Henry claims that he does not care about gold, wealth, or outward appearances. Given that a large portion of his army was poor and often abused by egocentric kings like Richard II, this claim was a great change of pace, which motivates the men to help King Henry. Subsequently, King Henry moves on to tell the men about the fame they will receive by fighting and living on Saint Crispian’s day, using pathos to appeal to the men’s emotions: “And Crispin Crispian shall ne’er go by, / from this day to the ending of the world, /

Read More
871 Words | 4 Pages

Although Henry did not alway carry himself with much dignity in his early years, he is portrayed as a powerful and honorable. Being a king puts him at the top of the social ladder, and garners respect from almost all below him. Along with this respect though, comes expectations. Henry is expected to be fearless and fair based upon his position in society.

Read More
550 Words | 3 Pages

King Henry VIII sought to protect his dignity by sustaining the Tudor reign. He was both prideful and greedy in character; which is supported by his determination in producing a male heir. He was so determined, he was willing to do anything - including betraying, divorcing and beheading his wives. In addition, Henry VIII was a strong participant in the Feudal System. Life in the Medieval castle was directed by the pyramid-shaped Feudal System.

Read More
1105 Words | 5 Pages

However, motivation is not the only thing that King Henry is able to do with his oratory. He is also able to use his words to intimidate, as he does when he threatens the Governor of Harfleur that if they do not surrender, he will not “leave the half-achieved Harfleur / Till in her ashes she is buried”. Henry is able to affect people with his

Read More
705 Words | 3 Pages

In addition to showing the serious side of Prince Henry, the speech foreshadows events to come while referencing Hal’s previous commitment to his ‘reformation’. Prince Henry’s vow to kill Percy predicts Hal’s victory over Hotspur and restoration of honor, which take place in V.4. The outcome of the play mirror Hal’s dramatic speech, as his honor was restored and Hotspur was killed. However, Hal’s speech in III.2 was presupposed by his monologue in the end of act I.2, where Hal states “And, like bright metal on a sullen ground, /

Read More
1093 Words | 5 Pages

Once he sets a goal, he uses every resource and focuses all his energy on accomplishing that goal; clearly, he takes his position as a king very seriously. He claims that he does not have the privilege of the ‘untroubled’ sleep of a common man indicating that he is dedicated to fulfilling his obligations as a leader. Furthermore, Shakespeare intends for us to view Henry as a hero by making him seem so committed to his responsibilities above his own personal feelings. (Source B)

Read More
502 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout his speech, Henry used figures of speech to engage his audience. One example of this is the phrase “Suffer not yourselves be betrayed with a kiss”, by this he meant that he hoped that his American comrades would not be fooled by the British and their false promises. These figures of speech, especially figurative language, were used to persuade the audience into turning against the British.

Read More
538 Words | 3 Pages

This countered all of the arguments that Henry would rather be back in England which he heard when pretending to be one of

Read More
1124 Words | 5 Pages

Shakespeare really wrote tragedies of great heights and earned standard category. His one of the best creation Richard II is a historical play rather being a tragedy. The history play is usually distinguished especially by its political purposes from other kinds of plays. Shakespeare 's use of his sources shows that he wanted to emphasize the political issues involved in the conflict between Richard and Bolingbroke, mainly the privileges of kingship and the right of rebellion. The play is consequently written not about the down fall of its hero but around the chronological stages by which Bolingbroke threatens, captures, and retains the crown.

Read More

More about Power And Legitimacy In King Henry IV

Open Document