President Johnson's Speech During The Vietnam War

998 Words4 Pages

1. Regrading to source 1.3.2. President Johnson purpose a speech about their support and defence to South Viet-Nam. the speech was created to the audience. The feeling to his speech gave the audience an emotionally sense that South Viet- Nam needs America support system. So that the domino effect won’t spread. The source was created in 7th April 1965. 2. The types sources that can investigate, why the United Sates was in Vietnam in 1965 are Through books, Newspaper/News later, Art, textbook, magazine, website, encyclopaedia and data-base. Analysing and Evaluating 2. Yes, the message would depend on when, where and by who it was heard or read. The reason for this is because the song was written in 1965, the record company refused …show more content…

Regrading to Source 1.33, the picture gives us an evidence that Vietnam was is reflected on elections, defence costs, racial violence and war on poverty. This source is regrading that the North and South Vietnam are fighting based on the problems chucked up in bigger slice of Vietnam. B. In source 1.3.3. President Minster Holt belly is full of the problems, US and Australia are trying to fight over for north, (Domino theory). In the source he seems very satisfied of the work and the fight for the domino effect. C. Regarding to source 1.3.3, President Johnson has a smaller slice of the smaller problems, while Minster Holt belly has a much bigger size on his plate. The reason why President Johnson has a smaller size is because he has not consumed most of the problems Vietnam are now facing, also the source gives me that Minster Holt has a much bigger responsibility so that’s why he has a bigger belly filled with the problems Vietnam are now facing. D. In source 1.3.3, President Johnson gives the bigger slice of Vietnam to minster holt because he has gotten in internal trouble. I think that President Johnson doesn’t want to be involved into the problems their fighting against so the little food on his plates reflect that he has little involvement with south Vietnam protection. So he insists Minster Holt to have the bigger load and much responsibility for defending South …show more content…

Regrading to source 1.3.6, In the source Pattie recalls that serval times she was in danger. The experience that she had in Vietnam was terrible, because she would have had experience dead bodies, emotional fear and other terrible things that the innocent Australians had to suffer. I believe that the memory of Vietnam will affect how she sees thing, for example someone killing inccconent men, might bring a sorrow feeling that she probably had seen worst in Vietnam. c. Historian Can use source 1.3.6 to construct a history of Australia involvement in Vietnam. Historian can use this source to collet key points, key dates and personal opinion, because this will help them construct a better evidence to support their hypothesis. 6. The hand pulling the puppet is meant to represent the anger and the frustration that the protest held against the Australians being sent to the war. This illustration is promoting the anti- US and anti – war message to stop the fighting in Vietnam and also stop the battle between north Vietnam. 7. a. Regrading to source 1.3.8. This photo would impact the readers because there would had seen what the war did to the little children. In the source we saw a boy crying, another little girl she was naked and a parent holding their son running from the devastation. In this source there is a smoke, children exposed to toxic gas can cause death which the reader could understand by looking at this picture more in