Primary Analysis Of Plato's The Republic

1959 Words8 Pages

The Primary Analysis Plato wrote The Republic (380 B.C.E) to create a philosophy to explore what it would take to create a just and perfect city-state. The books analyzed are Book V and Book VII. The main idea of Book V is that despite perceived as the weaker of the two sexes, women have the same capacity for skills and work that men have. This includes holding political office, being a Guardian, etc. Plato believes society can’t be perfect if the potential of women is ignored. Plato claims the individual women has more skills than the individual man, but men as a whole have more skill. Nature endows skills to men and women alike. The conclusion he draws from his thoughts are sex (gender) is irrelevant in government positions and other trades. It is morally wrong to reserve an office for men or an office for women. This is radical thought in ancient Athens because most women were contained to their private sphere. He goes one step further insinuating men and women can have the same nature. Plato believes women can also be Guardians and have the same importance and social standings male Guardians have. He proposes this is as if they are coworkers and equals. “Rather they are comrades whose shared social role includes temporary …show more content…

If the liberated would go back in the cave and be chained back up, he would not be able to see the shadows like he once did. The other prisoners would assume outside of the cave ruined his eyesight and it is too dangerous to leave the cave. Therefore if someone were to think of being released they would be put to death. The point of this part of the allegory is to show the duty of the enlightened is to return into the cave in order to lead others to enlightenment no matter the consequences. This thought comes from Socrates execution. Socrates, Plato’s teacher, was executed for corrupting the youth but Plato continued his work and philosophies after his