ipl-logo

Mens Rea In Criminal Law

2067 Words9 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Describe elements of crime

Register to read the introduction…

This is a critical element of a crime in the sense that the occurrence of a criminal offense is either voluntary or purposeful. A crime act usually comes from what is popularly referred to as ancient maxim that is the “act is not guilty unless the mind is guilty.” As such, it is required that for on to secure a conviction, the prosecution must prove beyond doubt that the accused not only committed the particular offense (actus reus) but also that the crime was committed with the sole intention of committing the crime (the defendant had the mens rea when committing the crime. (Karlen H. Peter …show more content…

In some cases, the words of the culprit can also be considered as acts in criminal law. For example, words meant to cause threats, perjury, conspiracy and solicitation effectively constitute the element of actus reus. Accordingly, actus reus is perceived to be the conduct of the accused; it can, for instance, be the act of commission or act of omission. In addition, it must be seen as a voluntary act with the implication of causing damage or harm. (Lynch, C.E. …show more content…

In addition, they are applied in the transport sector, for example, speeding or driving without insurance. An example of its application is in the R v. Williams 1WLR 588 case in which the offence of casing death while driving without a license was regarded to be one of the strict liability. As a result, a maximum penalty of 2 years imprisonment was given in addition to the 14 years sentence due to the offence of reckless driving leading to death.
It has, however, been argued that strict liability is quite harsh and can potentially lead to the creation of injustices. Some people also argue that imposing strict liability will more likely lead to people exercising more caution and, as such act as deterrent to others. Essentially though, strict liability is seen as important as it ensures that more convictions are secured. In addition, it effectively holds people liable by eliminating false accounts aimed at justifying one’s state of minds. (Cynthia J. Curry et al., 1997)
Considerations of whether is right for the defendant to be convicted without a blameworthy state of

Show More
Related

Cameron Todd Willingham Case Study

549 Words | 3 Pages

In the State of Texas v. Cameron Todd Willingham case, smalltown Todd Willingham was convicted and put on death row after being unjustly convicted of setting his house with arson and murder. The police’s preconceived opinions of him played its role in this case. However, when clouded judgment is involved mistakes are made. In this case, the results may have been an innocent man's life was destroyed and he ultimately died because of it. Police took his lack of injuries and the fact that he never tried to re-enter the house to save his kids as evidence in their case against him.

Read More

People Vs Knoller Case Study

1150 Words | 5 Pages

When a second-degree murder gets a new trial built on a philosophy of implied malice, the court mishandles its decision by demanding that the suspect must be shown to know that there was a high chance of subsequent death to others from the behavior of the perpetrator. The new trial was settled because of the fault in grasping the term “implied malice. The combination of these components of implied malice makes the trial court’s explanation a flawed one, and therefore a new trial created on this definition is a misuse of choice. The case is remanded for reconsideration on the basis of this

Read More

Appeal Of The Queen V. Danny Lalumiere Case

1100 Words | 5 Pages

Guilt can either be determined by factual guilt or legal

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Kinkel Vs The State Of Oregon

1013 Words | 5 Pages

* * * I feel that it would be impossible to ensure that there were the safeguards in place to protect society from your possible actions.” (victim parent, 2002). As empathetic starts, citizens will side with the victims of the defendant’s crimes because they belief the defendant’s crimes were out of evil and cruel torture and deserves all the punishment he can get and not get a break and let back to society where he has the ability to commit potential

Read More

The Case Of Esther Summerson And The Criminal Code Of Canada

984 Words | 4 Pages

A crime must also require an aspect of voluntariness for the act to be considered valid (Verdun-Jones, 2015, p. 48). In Martineau (1990) the Supreme Court ruled that S.7 of the Charter requires the “subjective foresight of the likelihood of death” as the minimum mens rea requirement for murder (Verdun-Jones, 2015, p.76). The case of Lucki (1955) solidified the fact that if a crime results from something that is outside of the hands of the accused they cannot be

Read More

Issah Jünger: An Accused Of Second-Degree Crime

928 Words | 4 Pages

While the mens rea is the mental state or intention behind it, it comes from the Latin translation of ‘guilty mind’. In this case, the actus reus is clear as the accused supposedly fired a gun and caused the death of Issah Jünger. For a second-degree murder accusation, the physical act of shooting someone and causing their death satisfies the actus reus criterion. Additionally, I can see that the accused displayed the required intent for the crime. Mens rea includes different mental states, such as intent, recklessness, and negligence.

Read More

Causes Of Wrongful Convictions In Australia

119 Words | 1 Pages

Wrongful convictions are a problem that most government officials won’t admit. The United States and other countries such as Australia have been susceptible to these miscarriages of justice. This can arise from a snowball effect of scenarios such as witness misidentification, perjured testimonies, coercive methods of interrogation, prosecutorial misconduct and ineffective counsel. These are some of the reasons that can potentially lead innocent people to be convicted of crimes they did not commit. The thousands of exonerations in the United States has caused concern for other nations to reevaluate their criminal justice system.

Read More

Richard Wilbur's 'A Measuring Worm'

1745 Words | 7 Pages

Ben Segall Segall 1 Gordon Roadcap Poem Explication Essay Richard Wilbur's poem "A Measuring Worm" captures the innocence and natural progression of life through the metaphor of a caterpillar. The speaker in the poem observes a yellow-striped green caterpillar as it climbs up a steep window screen, and the simple actions of the creature become an allegory for the speaker's own life. The poem's themes include growth, change, and mortality. The use of poetic devices such as imagery and metaphor, as well as the poem's structure, contribute to the effective conveyance of these themes.

Read More

Court Case Brief-US V. Martha Stewart And Peter Bacanovic

991 Words | 4 Pages

Tony Bombassi Case Brief- U.S. v. Martha Stewart and Peter Bacanovic, 305 F. Supp. 2d 368 (SDNY 2004) December 5, 2016 Facts Martha Stewart was CEO of her own publicly traded company. Bacanovic was a stock broker at Merrill Lynch who handle the stock sale. The criminal charges against Stewart and Bacanovic came about on December 27, 2001 after the sale of 3,928 shares of stock in ImClone Systems, Inc.

Read More

Due Process Model And Crime Control Model In The Criminal Justice System

909 Words | 4 Pages

The principle in law that one is innocent until proven guilty has created much discourse. There are those who feel that the moment that one is arrested, there is reasonable belief that they committed the crime. However, there are those who feel that just as the principle states, one is, and should be taken as a victim and the outcome could be either way: guilty or not guilty. In fact, this argument is supported by the many cases of malicious prosecutions and mistaken identities.

Read More

Comparing The Salem Witch Trials And The American Criminal Justice System

478 Words | 2 Pages

Over 300 years ago, more than 100 citizens of the colony of Massachusetts were accused of the crime of witchcraft, and many executed. Although this era in history, known as the Salem Witch Trials, lasted only mere months, its impact on the American criminal justice system has lasted until present day. Although both the trials in Salem and modern America are based on a similar justice system, there are vast differences, specifically in the rights of the defense, most notable in the separation of Church and State, the standards of evidence, and the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. The modern American criminal justice system, in comparison to that of the time of the Salem Witch Trials, has changed drastically. No longer is the rule of law based on

Read More

The Moral Logic Of Survivor Guilt Analysis

577 Words | 3 Pages

“...We often take responsibility in a way that goes beyond what we can reasonably be held responsible for”(Sherman 154), says Nancy Sherman in “The Moral Logic of Survivor Guilt.” Sherman believes that people blame themselves too much when something goes wrong in a dangerous situation; and even when something happens that is out of their control, they cannot forgive themselves for the outcome of the event. Should people in life-or-death situations be held accountable for their actions? Someone might argue that people should take responsibility for what they do, even in survival mode. However, in life-or-death situations, people should not accuse other, and make them feel remorse for their actions, because, in survival mode, a person wants to save themselves before anyone else.

Read More

Ethics In The Criminal Justice System

1279 Words | 6 Pages

Assignment #1 Review questions Chap. 1 p. 26: 1. A single standard of ethics cannot be applied to all criminal justice agencies. The world is too complex to legislate morality and ethics. The cultures that make up each part of the world are not the same.

Read More

Omissions In Criminal Law

2318 Words | 10 Pages

Introduction This question requires for an understanding on the rules and principles relating to criminal liability for an omission. As well as whether the rules and principles are too restrictive on individual freedom. In order to have an understanding of the rules and principles of omissions, one first must understand how criminal liability is imposed. For a person to be found guilty of a crime they must have both the mens rea and actus reus of the committed crime.

Read More

Essay On Harsh Punishment

1048 Words | 5 Pages

In the case of the death penalty, it has the added bonus in guaranteeing that the person would not offend again. Supporters of harsh punishments argue that the would-be criminal would consider the costs versus the benefits of committing a crime. If the costs outweigh the benefits, then it is assumed that he would stop what he is doing, effectively ‘deterred’. Furthermore, the usage of harsh punishments to effectively deter crime is ethically justified as it prevents more people from falling victim to crime. However it is extremely difficult to judge a punishment’s effectiveness based on its deterrence effect, consequently we must consider other variables that would entail a person to commit a crime.

Read More

More about Mens Rea In Criminal Law

Related Topics

Open Document