Private Ownership In Utopia, By Thomas More

“Unless private property is entirely done away with, there can be no fair distribution of goods, nor can the world be happily governed” states Thomas More in his essay, Utopia (1516). By all means, abolishing private ownership will provide happiness and government functionality. To certify, More presents various drawbacks of private property ownership. With this in mind, both modern examples and More’s observations validate the benefits of communal property ownership, as well as the flaws of private ownership. More validates how ownership of private property contains drawbacks. For instance, More asserts that “As long as private property remains, the largest and far the best part of mankind will be oppressed with an inescapable load of cares and anxieties” (1516). To clarify, hoggish individuals may hoard a voluminous amount of money by creating a monopoly from a private ownership. As a result, less powerful individuals cannot fulfill their basic needs with the sparse amount of money obtained. Hence, the tiered structure of society deprives the lower classes. In addition, More expresses how private ownership disables functionality of

To exemplify, private ownerships create a safe haven for crime since a warrant or reasonable suspicion must be present in the United States in order to conduct a search. Therefore, criminals take advantage of these policies by covering their tracks, and crime becomes more frequent. The government must be present in order to end corrupt manipulation of private ownership. Ownership of private property motivates monopolies and robber barons to emerge since monopolies exist within private ownership. Robber barons, ruthless business owners, and monopolies garner most of the money through manipulation of the economy. Consequently, these robber barons and monopoly owners amass all the money in the economy, and the majority of people acquire no money to satisfy basic