ipl-logo

Inequality In John Locke's Second Treatise Of Government

1083 Words5 Pages

John Locke’s Second Treatise of Government is most known for his justification of private property, but there are many other theories, though not as popular, that are equally as important. One of these is his justification of inequality, which will be covered in this essay. Locke says that until the invention of money, there was no point to accumulate more property, or wealth, than one could use because it would spoil. That changed after the introduction of money because money does not spoil, which allows people to accumulate more than they need. Locke argues that since men agreed to use money as a way to fairly possess more than they could use, they also agreed to the consequence of inequality. Though Locke presents a compelling argument, …show more content…

“And thus came in the use of money, some lasting thing that men might keep without spoiling, and that by mutual consent men would take in exchange for the truly useful, but perishable supports of life” (S.V.47). Because money (which Locke sometimes substitutes with gold, diamonds, or silver), does not spoil, one can acquire an unlimited amount of wealth, therefore breaking the Law of Nature. Unlike the way that excess apples rot, no matter how much money one possesses, there is no way for it to go bad. It will generally have as much use today as it will tomorrow. This leads to the situation of wealth inequality, where some people possess a lot of money while others have very little. Locke justifies this inequality by arguing that since men agreed to the use of money, they also agreed to the consequences that come with it, one of them being inequality. He elaborates on this idea saying:
But since gold and silver…has its value only from the consent of men…it is plain, that men have agreed to a disproportionate and unequal possession of the earth, they having, by a tacit and voluntary content, found a way how a man may fairly possess more land than he himself can use the product of…

Show More
Related
369 Words | 2 Pages

In his speech “Every Man a king” senator Huey Long suggested to reconstruct the wealth in America. He describes the current economic crisis as devastating because 10 people own about 85% of America’s wealth when the rest of the population does not have anything. Some even starve to death. The purpose of his speech is to create the effect of urgency. He wanted to limit the wealth one’s can have.

Read More
775 Words | 4 Pages

Economic inequality is the uneven distribution of wealth and differences in economic security found in each individual in a specific country or region. Today, the topic is being discussed profusely by the American presidential candidates and by many writers around the world because of the beliefs of whether there should or should not be wealth redistribution policies put into action. Larry Schwartz, the author of “35 Soul-Crushing Facts about American Income Inequality”, makes a valid claim that economic inequality is the foundation of the problems that the entire American population face such as poverty and a hindrance of economic growth. To begin with, Schwartz has an exceptional argument that the high rate of economic inequality, like is

Read More
965 Words | 4 Pages

“The state of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which obliges everyone: and reason, which of that law, teaches all of mankind, that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions.” this quote show that locke wanted all people to trust each other and to treat each other how they would want to be treated, with respect and trust that you have the best intentions for others not just yourself and to prove that you are not selfish. “Nothing was made by God for man to spoil or destroy. And thus considering the plenty of natural provision there was a long time in the world, and the few spenders… there could be then little room for quarrels or contentions about property so established.” Locke believed that if all men were to treat each other and all of their property equally there would be no arguments or fights over anything because everyone has equal things and equal opportunities in life.

Read More
1274 Words | 6 Pages

The rich use tactics to gain the support of the middle class, but without losing any of their own riches, like wealth or power, for their own gain. It was at the cost of the “slaves, Indians, and poor whites” (Zinn 1). It spared the rich any expenses, but brought them much gain, from the support. Finally, the growth of the colonies positively impacted the rich as well, as they received the profits and benefits from the expansions. With one percent of property owners owning forty four percent of the wealth, it shows how the majority of the wealth was given to the rich, and not distributed among the other classes at all, deepening the division.

Read More
1385 Words | 6 Pages

New England was fed up with the Church of England and the Puritans wanted to recreate their own religion which they thought was more what God had believed was the intended belief. They both decided that neither of them like the way England was set up and said that England was no good for their beliefs. They planned to leave England and go to the new world to set up a life where their children had the chance to be raised in a perfect society with no corruption. Concentrated on town life and industries, they made a living off of fishing, whaling and shipbuilding. Whale oil was key because it made their lamps.

Read More
788 Words | 4 Pages

An example of the Federalist’s relevance today is its’ principle regarding wealth. Wealth is often times the dividing factor of class. Paper # 10 of The Federalist Papers states, “But the most common and durable source of factions has been the various and unequal distribution of property. Those who hold and those who are without property have ever formed distinct interests in society.” (Hill, The Federalist Papers, Paper #10, p.1)

Read More
674 Words | 3 Pages

Question 1: Explain some contradictions within the American Revolution, which were explain in the class and the text. The Social Contract by John Locke stated that every individual should have the right to life, liberty and property. But, the elite Americans did not agree with the “property” part. During the revolutionary war, the Americans were fighting for their freedom from the British, but domestic freedom within was a different war itself.

Read More
489 Words | 2 Pages

As outlined in chapter 10 of the course text, inequality in housing and wealth is a major problem. The United States is described to be the most unequal countries in the western hemisphere. But with the inequalities when it comes to wealth, the United States is one of the richest countries in the world. Wealth is the sum total of a person’s assets. These assets include, cash in the bank and value of all properties, not only land but houses, cars, stocks, and bonds, and retirements savings.

Read More
1614 Words | 7 Pages

A Comparison of the Acquisition of Wealth and Property among the Northeastern American Indians and the Colonial American English Colonists Native Americans were living in North America long before the English discovered and began to settle in North America. The English began to take over the land and this brought about conflict between the Northeastern American Indians and the English colonists. This conflict arose because of the controversial views of property and wealth. What is wealth? Wealth is an abundance of valuable possessions or money; the state of being rich; material prosperity.

Read More
137 Words | 1 Pages

Thomas Paine claims that, “the poor are not oppressed, the rich are not privileged.” However, I disagree with his claim. There is a tremendous gap in the amount of income between the two. Some argue that this gap goes against their argument on equality.

Read More
1301 Words | 6 Pages

Throughout all of history wealth has never been distributed evenly; no monarchist kingdom, communist utopia, socialistic society, or modern free market has ever existed in a state of equilibrium. The laws of the land have always seemed to operate in a manner of some sort of prejudice. The rich generate wealth at a much higher rate than the poor. Income inequality has existed, in some form or another, since the first trade transaction. Since, we have begun record keeping, statistics show the rich controlling increasing amounts of the total income.

Read More
856 Words | 4 Pages

The problem with the widened wealth gap is that the inequality may harm the quality. Meaning that those in the higher classes see it as you can use the money with no restrictions. However, economist believe that the “relationship between inequality and economic freedom, with the possibility that policies that are meant to reduce inequality will reduce economic freedom, which will then only make inequality worse.”

Read More
1474 Words | 6 Pages

A central theme to Adam Smith’s idea of economic prosperity is derived from the cooperation of civilians to contribute to the welfare of all. When describing the complexity of the division of labor and its inherent ability to increase one’s standard of living, Smith states, “Without the assistance and co-operation of many thousands, the very meanest person in a civilized country could not be provided the easy and simple manner in which he is commonly accommodated” (Smith 20). Smith believes that the exchanging of goods is paramount to a flourishing economy, and even declares that it is of human nature to desire such transactions among other fellow citizens. The cooperation of the people – galvanized by the ambition of self-interest – is what

Read More
554 Words | 3 Pages

Although it is considered a necessity in order to live, Americans in particular seem to value the gaining and keeping of money, a desire which seems to increase the more money a person has. Though the lower classes don’t seem to believe in this very much, this is very apparent in the upper classes. Many rich people do have enough money to retire happily, but just because of this American Dream, they want to keep earning more. Money is often used to measure somebody’s worth, so when somebody has the opportunity arises to make more money, it is often taken, even if one doesn’t need it.

Read More
1801 Words | 8 Pages

Therefore, based on the above, I am clearly in support of Locke's theory in comparison with the one his opponent. The distinct reasons why I consider such a position are discussed

Read More

More about Inequality In John Locke's Second Treatise Of Government

Related Topics

Open Document